readability – Table cells: verbose or abstract?

I have received a surprising feedback from a large number of my users on something that I would never consider a problem. If the number of votes on this particular return was not so important, I would not consider it relevant, but now I guess my intuition.

In my product, there is a table / matrix that displays the flights and their attributes.

The lines represent the types of flights available:

Rate A
Rate B
Rate C

The columns represent the flight attributes. The header line literally reads:

Rate Name | Refundable | Free checked baggage

It is important to note that it is a very small matrix, with no more than 5 tariffs (usually one or two) and exactly 3 attributes.

The cells in the table show

Yes No

for the refund, and


for free checked baggage.

As we said, it's a small table that still stands on one screen.

Feedback indicates that cells are confused and difficult to interpret.

Instead of the refundable cells displaying Yes / No, the return of information asks the cells to indicate: Refundable / Non-Refundable.

Instead of 0/1/2 for checked baggage, the cells must indicate: No checked baggage / 1 checked baggage / 2 checked baggage.

As I said, I am really surprised by such feedback. Myself, I would never see a problem, but I may have missed a trend or an important study?

5th dnd – What happens if a target Hex / Hunter's Mark drops to 0 and then goes back?

Is the creature still under the spell's effect after being reduced to 0, then brought on top of it?

The spell is not over and you have not chosen a new target. This can be useful if, for example, your target was simply unconscious and you wanted to inflict as much damage as possible to kill him, because at 0HP,

If the damage is equal to or greater than your maximum health, you suffer instant death.

While the creature is again above 0 health, can the caster use his bonus action to designate a new target for the spell?

RaW, yes. The description of the spell would not take into account the fact that a target could be healed. A spell like Disintegrate was finally used to deal with such scenarios (in the case of Druids in particular), so maybe you could move the Hunter's Mark only if your target was unconscious / dead. However, as currently written, even if the creature is raised from 0HP, it fulfills Hunter's Mark and Hex condition.

If the target drops to 0 hp before the spell ends,

So, you can change the target of the spell.

Does the choice of a new target end the fate of the first?

Yes. It seems logical that targeting a new creature excludes the previous one. Otherwise, you would now have a single target spell targeting 2 creatures (or more, if more were brought to 0HP). At least that is the intention of the lot, and designers use the terminology "move" without problems when they refer to targeting new targets.

That being said, the wording is ambiguous.

You place a curse on a creature. […] You can use a bonus action […] curse a new creature.

Does this imply that the old is ignored? If we read the complete description of the spell, it only makes sense if.

Until the end of the spell, you deal 1d6 additional necrotic damage to target when you hit him with an attack. Also choose an ability when you cast the spell. Target has a disadvantage on the capacity checks performed with the chosen capacity. Yes target Fall to 0 points before the end of the spell, you can use a bonus action each on your side to curse a new creature. A spell spell on the target ends that spell early.

The spell always refers to a Only target, not to cursed targets. In addition, if you had multiple targets, by this formulation, throwing Remove the curse on one of the targets would dispel them entirely. Your deputy minister can establish an internal rule based on that ambiguity, yes, but I think there is evidence that the fate is for single target, never. Anyway, I asked on Twitterand maybe we will have confirmation.

View / play MacBook Air Mac mini hard drive?

Some of your past responses have not been well received and you may be stuck.

Please pay close attention to the following tips:

  • Please make sure to respond to the question. Provide details and share your research!

But to avoid

  • Ask for help, clarification, or answer other answers.
  • Make statements based on opinions; save them with references or personal experience.

To learn more, read our tips for writing good answers.

[ Newborn & Baby ] Open question: A survey at what age did you leave the house?

[ Newborn & Baby ] Open question: A survey at what age did you leave the house? .

Taxonomy – & # 39; Infrastructure & # 39; and & # 39; Application for Business & # 39; are types of …?

In my web user interface, I need options to select different types of computing resources.

I have options like …

  • "Operational scope" – Cloud vs. on-site.
  • & # 39; Style of development & # 39; – agile vs waterfall.

Is there a general taxonomy for this type of thing?

I was perplexed about a requirement that the user must determine whether a given resource is an "infrastructure" or a "business-oriented application". What concept encompasses both options?

hetzner bitcoinnode problem | Talk Web Hosting

Quote Originally posted by danialrafiee
See the article
I'm trying to run the bitcoin node on the hetzner windows10 virtual machine (based on my esxi delicate server) but every time hetzner blocks this virtual machine, ip cuse this error


We noticed that your server is sending back packets to the gateway.

As this is not allowed, we regret to inform you that your server has been

What I should do
P2P is illegal in Hetzner? or I have other problems

If you do not find your answer, submit a ticket to Hetzner for clarification after reading the following.


We strive to maintain our networks at the highest level possible so that all our customers benefit. Therefore, the following actions are prohibited:

  • Operating Applications Used to Extract Cryptographic Currencies
  • The analysis of foreign networks or foreign IP addresses
  • The use of fake source IP addresses.

dnd 5th – Would the existence of a spell glyph also require casting the stored spell?

Wish has mainly two classes of use:

  • Duplicate the effects of a spell
  • Cause something else; take game damage from the Stress of fate

This means that in practice you have two options to create a protection glyph:

  • Duplicate a Glyph of protection spell exactly as it is written, which means that you must always use the second spell slot and only need to provide the spells you are able to prepare (and have prepared at the time of your launch). Wish
  • Create a glyph of protection with the spell you want (and perhaps an additional effect – it's your wish …), without having to pass the second location of the spell or to prepare it. take game damage from the Stress of fate.

There is a wrinkle in the previous use of the Wish although:

The basic use of this spell is to duplicate any other spell level 8 or lower. You do not need to meet the requirements of this spell, including expensive components. The spell simply takes effect.

What exactly is a "requirement ignored by Wish"is the subject of considerable debate." Based on this post, requirements is here to refer to such things as casting time, hardware components, spell lists, preparation, etc. I do not think that would allow you to ignore the requirements

  • Prepare the spell you plan to place in the glyph
  • Be able to spend the spell location needed to cast the spell you plan to place in the glyph

Unless, of course, your DM decides to decide that these requirements can be passed by hand under the clause "Ignore the requirements of fate".

Last minute Cyber ​​Week Deal 35% discount on recurring expenses

Cyber ​​Week Last Minute Offer

Some customers have let us know that we do not offer special black Friday / cyber deals on Monday because they really wanted to take advantage of a great deal. We have deepened and presented what we think is an excellent offer to show our appreciation to our customers. Use code ENJOY get 35% out of any product we sell until 2019.

This promo code has no limit! It can be used infinitely on as many products as you want, on any billing cycle, and it reproduces itself !. This promotional code can be used for new and existing customers.

Order the openvz servers here (promo price applied manually in the basket) ->

Order the kvm servers here (promo price applied manually in the cart) ->

Order backup vms here (promo price applied manually in the cart) ->

Order the dedicated servers here (promo price applied manually in the basket) ->

Our servers are hosted in Dallas, TX – Carrier1 Facility!

Do not forget to proceed to checkout to see the final price in your cart!

IPv4 test:
IPv6 test: 2605: E480: 0: 4 :: 2
Test file:

n3Servers – VPS hosting and dedicated hybrid servers in New York – 1GB VPS @ $ 9.49 / year and more! – Low box

Tim from n3Servers submitted very interesting offers for Cyber ​​Week on LowEndBox! They offer OpenVZ-based VPS with plenty of disk space, as well as dedicated KVM-based hybrid servers with lots of resources from New York!

Their WHOIS is public and you can find their ToS / Legal Docs here. They accept credit cards, PayPal, Bitcoin, Litecoin and Alipay as means of payment.

Here is what they had to say:

"At n3Servers, we strive to be an essential hosting partner. We provide all the hosting solutions you need to achieve your goals. It is the human element that distinguishes n3Servers servers on this day we live, focused on technology. We offer an affordable way to put your business or ideas online, quickly, with personalized service and support.

Exclusively for the LowEndBox community at Cyber ​​Week 2018, we are excited to introduce the following discounted packages on our VPS packages and dedicated hybrid servers!

Here are the offers:

1GB OpenVZ

  • 1 GB of RAM
  • 1GB vSWAP
  • 1 x processor core
  • 40 GB of hard disk space
  • 2.5TB bandwidth
  • 100 Mbps
  • 1 x IPv4
  • Install instantly
  • OpenVZ / SolusVM
  • $ 9.49 / year
  • [ORDER]

2GB OpenVZ

  • 2 GB of RAM
  • 2 GB vSWAP
  • 2 x CPU Core
  • 80 GB of hard disk space
  • Bandwidth of 5 TB
  • 100 Mbps
  • 1 x IPv4
  • Install instantly
  • OpenVZ / SolusVM
  • $ 12.79 / year
  • [ORDER]

4GB OpenVZ

  • 4 GB of RAM
  • 4GB vSWAP
  • 4 x CPU Core
  • 150 GB of hard disk space
  • 8 TB bandwidth
  • 100 Mbps
  • 1 x IPv4
  • Install instantly
  • OpenVZ / SolusVM
  • $ 19 / year
  • [ORDER]

* The offers below are comparable to dedicated machines based on the dedicated resources provided and are therefore in accordance with our pricing guidelines *

8 GB hybrid

  • 4 x processor cores (2.10 GHz)
  • 8 GB of DDR3 RAM
  • Hard disk storage of 200 GB enterprise
  • Monthly bandwidth of 10 TB
  • / 29 IPv4 Allocation (5 IP Addresses)
  • 1 Gbps
  • Linux or Windows
  • KVM / SolusVM
  • $ 199 / year
  • [ORDER]

16 GB hybrid

  • 8 x processor cores (2.10 GHz)
  • 16 GB of DDR3 RAM
  • Hard disk storage of 320 GB enterprise
  • Monthly bandwidth of 15 TB
  • / 29 IPv4 Allocation (5 IP Addresses)
  • 1 Gbps
  • Linux or Windows
  • KVM / SolusVM
  • $ 348 / year
  • [ORDER]


Buffalo, NY, USA
IPv4 test:

OpenVZ Nodes:
– Intel Xeon E3 Processors
– 32 GB of RAM
– 4x 2TB hard drives
– RAID-10 hardware with CVM
– 1 Gbps uplink

Hybrid nodes:
– Two Intel Xeon E5-2620v2 processors
– 128 GB of RAM
– 4x 2TB hard drives
– RAID-10 hardware with CVM
– 1 Gbps uplink

Please let us know if you have questions / comments and enjoy!

treegraph – Elegant implementation of a factor graph

Consider the tree graph used in part of my solution to this question:

Factor tree graph

Each level $ i $ at $ i! $ nodes, and the connection rate is $ i + 1 $:

I've kludged all the code to generate this graph (with better code let not reproduced).

Is there an elegant way to generate such a tree graph for an arbitrary number of levels?