vpn – Does the Load Balancing of Multiple WAN Connections Improve Anonymity?

I would like to understand the pros and cons of balancing outgoing connections for anonymity.

Scenario 1: My Router (ip A)> VPN Router (ip B)> VPN Router (ip C)> Web Host

Scenario 2: My Router (ip A)> 3 Load Balanced VPN Client Connections (ips B C D)> 3 Separate Connections Leaving VPN Routers (ips E F G)> Web Host

Continuing my sorry curiosity,
What happens if senario 2 to corresponds to 3 connections to the same VPN server but the VPN IP addresses or source to the web host are obviously different.

A problem that I identified is that of senario 2: you have a bigger fingerprint / connection pattern, which is a problem. Visit obscure sites compared to popular sites.

This is assuming the user accepts latency and authentication issues or SSL, etc.

5th dnd – Balancing a cursed invisibility ring

I plan to launch a campaign and I had the idea of ​​a cursed invisibility ring. Here are the technical details (without lint).

Wearing this ring provides the user with the benefits of invisibility fate, but it also disadvantages the stealth controls against the enemies who can hear.

How is it balanced? If it's unbalanced, what changes should I make to offset it?

Network – Load Balancing Performance: Sophos vs. Cyberoam

The results CR35iNG – 10.6.4 MR-1 and Sophos XG135 (SFOS 17.5.3 MR-3) are side by side and the load balancing comparison results are presented below:

Load balancing test with Sophos help
Load balancing test with Sophos help

Load balancing test with Cyberoam
Load balancing test with Cyberoam

I've already set the round robin method on Sophos:

define the wan-load-balancing weighted-round-robin routing

Both UTM are sitting next to each other and I just replaced my nic gateway to test them. There are 4 modems, 100 Mbps DL / 10 Mbps UL each. As you can see, Sophos is still slower than Cyberoam. What could be the problem with Sophos here?

linux – load balancing nginx localhost

I have two nginx servers that serve images: Foo server and Bar. I want to configure load balancing so that each request received by the Foo server is redirected to the Bar server. I've read about load balancing in the nginx documentation and it seems like I should set the upstream section on the Foo server like this:

imgserver upstream {
localhost server;
server-bar.com server;

location / {
proxy_pass http: // imgserver;

Now, I suspect that this configuration will only cause the Bar Server to serve the images, because each time the Foo server receives a request, it tries to replace it with another proxy. Is it correct? If so, how can I configure this correctly?

Should I use another port for Foo redirection? Or maybe add a custom header on the redirect?

5th dnd – Are there any problems balancing with allowing the launched javelins to be fired for free like ammunition weapons?

Weapons with ammunition ownership, such as bows and crossbows, can be used without having to worry about the economics of action related to the ammo themselves (such as arrows or locks ) because firing ammunition is considered part of the attack.

From PHB (pp. 146-147):

Ammunition. You can use a weapon with the properties of ammo to launch a ranged attack only if you have ammo to shoot from the weapon. Every time you attack with the weapon, you spend a piece of ammo. Firing ammunition from a quiver, crate or other container is part of the attack.

Some melee weapons have the property to cast, such as the javelin, which allows you to use the weapon to perform a ranged attack.

From PHB (p 147):

Discarded. If a weapon has the property thrown away, you can launch the weapon to launch a ranged attack.

In the current state of things, as bleach weapons and other weapons to launch do not have the property of ammunition, an interaction with an object (or even an action) would be needed to draw the weapon. weapon before it can be launched. In particular, characters with Extra Attack can only use both attacks to launch such weapons as they have already started their turn by holding one.

When a character based on the STR and who focuses on the melee, such as a barbarian or a paladin, is forced to use remote javelins (for example, against flying creatures), it can be frustrating to essentially lose their Extra Attack class function, because they can not get enough Javelins per turn, whereas if they were a DEX-based character with a bow (like a Ranger), they would have no penalty from that type and could fully utilize their Extra Attack class function.

Therefore, I propose the following houserule:

  • Launched weapons may be considered as fired as part of the attack, as are weapons with ammunition property;
  • However, they can only be fired "for free" in this way if they are immediately launched as a ranged attack;
  • If you shoot a fair one to hold one or to make a melee attack with, you must use the free object interaction or your action as usual;

In this way, a barbarian or something like that can make two ranged attacks with weapons in hand, but that can not be exploited to be used in melee.

Is it balanced? Is there anything I neglect regarding balance or feats that I have not considered?

Load Balancing – High Availability Web Site Using IIS / Windows Server

My website is running on a single Windows Server 2016 computer with IIS and SQL Server 2017. With each Windows update, new hardware installation, and so on, my site is disconnected.

My goal is to let the website work normally (read and write to a database) even when one of the machines is offline.
I have researched and encountered technologies such as cluster failover, load balancing, etc., but I do not know where to apply them.

My current understanding is that I need 4 machines (2 for IIS and 2 for SQL Server) and at each level I need:

  • OS: Network Load Balancing
  • IIS: ??
  • SQL Server: Availability group still active

Many of these items that I have found date from 2009, 2010, I do not know if they always apply or there is something better now

I am new to setting up a high availability web server. Advice would be appreciated.

Compute Engine https with load balancing with google managed ssl cert

Hello, I would need help to understand the configuration of HTTPS load balancing.

At the moment, I have only one instance of vm (debian lemp stack with nginx and no apache) loaded into the compute engine, with a set of dns fields. Everything works fine, but I do not have a load balancing game yet.

About front load balancing https more or less, for me, is clear, but for the back-end https, I have some doubts.

For the moment, the default nginx configuration file default_ssl.vhost is defined as follows: `server {
listen to 443 http2 ssl;
#listen [::]: 443 ssl;
Server name _;
include /jet/etc/nginx/conf.d/document_root.settings;

        ssl_certificate "/jet/etc/letsencrypt/live/odisseo.io/fullchain.pem";
ssl_certificate_key "/jet/etc/letsencrypt/live/odisseo.io/privkey.pem";

# paramsl ssl

include /jet/etc/letsencrypt/options-ssl-nginx.conf; # managed by Certbot
ssl_dhparam /jet/etc/letsencrypt/ssl-dhparams.pem; # managed by Certbot

# Load the configuration files for the default server block.
include /jet/etc/nginx/conf.d/*.inc;
include / jet / etc / nginx / sites-enabled / *;

} `

my questions are: once i have finished configuring https load balancing with google self-managed certificates on the compute engine, how can i change the default_ssl.vhost configuration file nginx?
Because I've read that certificates, once the self-managed procedure is successful, can be eliminated.
Do I need to configure a proxy on the default_ssl.vhost file nginx conf file?
If so, how should the entire file be configured?

The last question is: dns cloud subnet in the compute engine, by the time I have a type A record with the static IP address of the VM instance, once i have finished configuring the front load balancing -end and back-end https, will I have to change this IP address with the new static front IP address?

Thank you in advance for help.

Compute Engine Load Balancing – Server Error

my questions concern the load balancing http / s on the calculation engine:

if an instance is loaded into the compute engine with a europe-west3-a zone set, by default, the Google cloud already has predefined load balancing, is not it?

So I will configure load balancing only if I want a load balancing customization, is not it?

Is not it automatic scale?

My second question is about cdn on google cloud. To have the cdn in the calculation engine, it must set the load balancing, but if, instead of setting the load balancing to get the benefit of the cdn, I put the multi-zone area on the instance, can I get the same result? And if not, what is the difference between cdn with load balancing and multizone?

Thank you in advance for helping me understand.

load balancing – IP HAProxy and Keepalived IP assignment

According to the figure below, assume that two load balancers are grouped together using Keepalived. My question is: should each LB get public IP addresses (ie and .4) assigned to its public interfaces? Can they just listen to the VIP (with nonlocal_bind enabled) and not use public IP addresses?

| (vip)
lb1 lb2

Thank you so much.

Amazon Web Services – Install the AWS SSL Certificate on an EC2 Instance Without Load Balancing

I am new to AWS and am experiencing some confusion when installing an SSL certificate on an EC2 instance.

Is it possible to install the certificate without using ELB or Cloudfront. I do not need a load balancer because the application runs on a single instance.

Do I have another option to install the AWS SSL certificate? If load balancing is the only option, is it possible for a single instance?

Thank you in advance for your answers