Access to a file server member of the Samba domain with a user not belonging to the domain

I have a Samba 4 domain controller (Ubuntu 18.04) (ad.domain.local) and a member server as a file server. I can access the file server share (fs.domain.local) from domain members without problems, but I also want it to be accessible from non domain member accounts. When I am connected with a local user on my Windows 10 machine and I want to access \ fs, my access is denied. What do I need to change for this to work? Thank you.

In log.smbd, I receive the following messages:

(2020/02/25 14:34:46.940399,  0) ../source3/auth/auth_domain.c:122(connect_to_domain_password_server)
  connect_to_domain_password_server: unable to open the domain client session to machine AD.DOMAIN.LOCAL. Error was : NT_STATUS_CANT_ACCESS_DOMAIN_INFO.
(2020/02/25 14:34:46.940909,  0) ../source3/auth/auth_domain.c:185(domain_client_validate)
  domain_client_validate: Domain password server not available.

smb.conf from fs.domain.local:

        workgroup = DOMAIN
        client signing = auto
        client use spnego = yes
        kerberos method = secrets and keytab
        realm = DOMAIN.LOCAL
        security = ads
        username map = /etc/samba/
        vfs objects = acl_xattr
        map acl inherit = yes
        # the next line is only required on Samba versions less than 4.9.0
        store dos attributes = yes
        allow trusted domains = yes

  path = /data/share
  read only = no

smb.conf from ad.domain.local

# Global parameters
        dns forwarder =
        netbios name = AD
        realm = DOMAIN.LOCAL
        server role = active directory domain controller
        workgroup = DOMAIN
        idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes
        username map = /etc/samba/
        vfs objects = acl_xattr
        map acl inherit = yes
        # the next line is only required on Samba versions less than 4.9.0
        store dos attributes = yes

        path = /var/lib/samba/sysvol/domain.local/scripts
        read only = No

        path = /var/lib/samba/sysvol
        read only = No

address – How to generate sub-addresses belonging to a private key

Addresses derived from an HD wallet are not intentionally publicly linked to each other (which would obviously be terrible for privacy). Your wallet software will know that the addresses are linked (that is, it derived them all from the same seed), but not an occasional observer.

As a result, when you pay bitcoin to a child address, there is no associated activity involving parent addresses.

How to generate subaddresses belonging to a private key in the API

You can not. Each address derived from an HD wallet will have a corresponding unique private key associated with it. The primary private key in the wallet will not be able to sign and spend funds stored at children's addresses – you need children's private keys for this.

address – How to generate subaddresses belonging to a private key in the API

We are creating a platform to buy / sell Bitcoin based on the API.
We need to generate a new child address for each customer allowing them to receive Bitcoin. But all incoming Bitcoins should be stored in our main wallet.
Here is what we have done so far:

  1. Creating a new wallet using the API using /api/v2/create and receive an address like 1551SHYQu8CPuRxJagViGkppNZrv2gkfFi
  2. Converting the wallet to HD using /merchant/:guid/enableHD
  3. Receipt of the first sub-portfolio (xPriv & xPub) if I am not mistaken with a new public address 1CLpEvgs9o2mgKN5aS1mPeXGcqXs7fT75F
  4. Send BTC to the address generated in step 3.

We expected the transaction to have occurred on the last address as a child derived from the first address should be stored and visible in the main wallet, but using explorers, we discovered that there is no event on the main address, while the transaction on the second is confirmed.
We may have done something wrong, or we may have a misunderstanding about the correct behavior for this purpose.
Your assistant is much appreciated.

What happens when I delete a Google folder or document (or PDF) belonging to someone else

2020 valid answer.

They will not be able to view the files but their files are NOT deleted. They can still find and recover the files they own

Steps to Find and Recover Lost / Orphaned Files from Google Drive

Step 1:

S & # 39; identify on Google Drive.

2nd step:

Find lost files by clicking on this link: FIND MY LOST FILES

by placing on the search bar:

is:unorganized owner:me

Step 3:

Recover files by right-clicking on the file and selecting Move.

How to find and recover my lost files / folders in Google Drive

To conclude

It is safe to delete files from your Google Drive that do not belong to you.
However, you should inform the owners on how to find and recover these (orphaned) files.

Even following the above steps files deleted by anyone (created or downloaded to a shared folder belonging to someone else) can still be recovered by the current owner of the mentioned files.

No one can delete files downloaded or created in Google Drive, but the owner of the files mentioned.

When searching on the site, other similar issues such as: deleting a file from the folder entering Google Drive deletes the original file ?, What happens to the files when deleted from a shared folder that has been added to their Google Drive ?, How to display orphans in Google Drive, in Google Drive, "delete" delete the file? It indicates that it is still accessible to employees. Where are the files that I shared with someone who deleted them also appear. I find this confusing for me or quite old and perhaps outdated.

legal – Can the name of a private lake (belonging to someone else) be legally used in a domain name?

I use a private lake subdivision name as the domain name. The name of the lake is not a registered trademark. It is managed by an owners association. I have no connection with the POA. I don't mention them at all. It is only intended for service providers inside and outside the lake. The domain of POA is only the initials of the lake followed by POA.

I just received a cease and desist letter. Can they tell me I can't use the name of the lake in my field or do you think it's a scary tactic?

programming practices – Ethics / legality of copy-paste code from the repository of proprietary software belonging to the company to a personal repository?

Let's say I figure out how to do something by writing code for business software at the time of business.

Code.lang file:

if (very complicated logic) {

This "Code.lang" file is part of the repository that I-or-someone else wrote for the repository in order to execute an implementation. In addition, the syntax is unique in that it is the only way to execute the implementation in a manner specifically required given the framework / language.

I have two options:

  1. I can try to rewrite it from memory, which, if it is complicated, will be very difficult. Most likely, I will have to repeat some or all of the research I did while writing this initially.

  2. Or I can just go to GitHub / Bitbucket / etc. repo, click on the file and copy and paste the code from there. Then I would change whatever is necessary for it to work with my personal repository.

What are the ethical / legal implications of the conduct of either of these practices?

why can i update a file belonging to root using sudo vi, but not add a line with the echo file "Thing" >>

Sudo elevates the process it calls, it does not elevate any of the current shell processing like redirection, globalization, etc.

File redirection >> /etc/httpd/conf.d/vhosts.conf is being processed by your current shell, which still works under your current privileges.

You can try something like this.

sudo bash -c 'echo "Include thing" >> /etc/httpd/conf.d/vhosts.conf'


echo "Include thing" | sudo tee -a /etc/httpd/conf.d/vhosts.conf

sharepoint online – Can I use the REST API (or an alternative) to access responses to a form belonging to a group?

I'm looking to try to get responses from a group form via the REST API or some other alternative (as I can't do it via a feed). Is it possible? And if so, could someone give an example?

Thank you

Edit: If this is not possible, it would still be useful if it were not a group form and owned by a user.

Another site not belonging to us chosen for the canonical one selected by Google

One of our sites is affected by a negative SEO. In our Google Search Console, we notice that Google has chosen a different domain as the canonical URL. We do not own this area. How he got there is unknown.

Incorrect canonical URL for

How do we fix it?

If a male business owner declares to identify as a woman, does this entitle her to receive business benefits belonging to women?

I know it's a rude question to rig up to be transgender, but if it goes through the transition process, which includes at least 6 therapy sessions (depending on the state), hormone replacement therapy, gets her name (not always necessary) and her gender marker changed legally, and fully identifies and really as a woman, which would make her a woman. no man would go through this whole process just to get business benefits.