dnd 5e – What ways can you give a creature the capability to speak?

I am looking for ways in 5e to grant the capability of speech to a creature, ideally permanently.

To be specific, I am interested in granting an Artificer’s Steel Defender and creatures like it the ability to speak. For instance the Steel Defender’s stat block states it “understands the languages you speak”, implying that it only understands them and does not speak them.

I am assuming that it is possible for the creature to use and attune to items.

Below are some ideas I have had after some initial investigation, but none seem sufficient and some are limited or dubious rules-wise:

Through Magic Items

  • items that say “You can speak and understand X” (e.g. ring of
    elemental command
    , demon armor, efreeti chain, etc.)
    (Do these apply in our context of a creature with the stat block
    above? Specific v.s. generic – which is which here?)

  • items that grant an Intelligence boost (e.g. headband of intellect)
    (Is boosting Intelligence enough to give a creature like the Steel
    Defender the capability to speak?)

  • items that allow telepathy (e.g. helm of telepathy)
    (In general this isn’t truly spoken speech. Oftentimes these are
    only communication with two people are there items that grant many?)

Through Spells

  • awaken: limitation “Huge or smaller beast or plant”
  • varieties of polymorph: limitation a transformation itself
  • telepathic spells: limitation is telepathy is not true speech

(In general, these have the limitation of possibility of being dispelled and require a spellcaster.)

Older Editions

Also, I know in previous editions 3.5e Pearl of Speech existed, but I am interested in RAW 5e.

If you know of other ways that minimize the limitations involved and require few rare items, please share.

WP_Query and Meta Query filter custom post type by capability

I am currently using WP_Query for my custom filter function of a custom post type and I would like to filter this if a user has a capability.

Using roles is also an option, but it would be easier if I just add this capability without switching roles for existing admins/users.

Her is a sample on how I do most of my query posts:

$args('meta_query') = array(
                     'relation' => 'AND', 
                      array('key' => 'featured', 
                            'value' => '1', 
                            'compare' => 'NOT EXISTS', 
                            'type' => 'NUMERIC')
                      );

$args('post_type') = $customPostType;                       
$args('posts_per_page') = '10';     
$query = new WP_Query($args);

How do I go about this?

Scanning – Canon MG5520 Cannot Connect to My MacBook Pro Without Scanning Capability

The last time these questions were answered was in 2015, so I ask the question again. I tried everything, removed software, reloaded on my mac with all the updated drivers. I can print very well, I cannot scan. I even tried to browse the image garden and the "scan" area is grayed out. I'm about to throw this thing away. I have worked very well in recent years. I just wonder if anyone is experiencing the same problem.

dnd 5th – Capstone Capability of the Homebrew Assistant, input search

Working on a collection of magician subclasses that tap into external planes is the power of the cornerstone for the Beastlands. I'm not happy with the wording, and if anyone has comments on the usefulness and balance, I would be happy to hear it.

Flailing also for a name …

From the 14th level, when you are reduced to 0 points of life, you are rather transformed into a beast of CR 0 as if via the wild form ability of the druid, except that the animal form benefits from the advantages of your ability to & # 39; adaptation, and you can only go back to your original form by taking a short rest, at which point you recover 1 life point.

For context, the ability to adapt

L & # 39; adaptation At the 6th level, you gain the ability to adopt certain facets of animals, as your body acquires a more beastly form. Choose one
the list of adaptations below. You gain a second adaptation when you reach
14th level.

Aquatic adaptation – Your skin becomes scaly like a fish, or
smooth as a seal. You gain a swimming speed of 30 feet and can breathe
comfortably in the air and water.

Animal skin – You win a shell, a shell,
or dense gray skin like a rhino. Your base AC becomes 11 + your
dexterity modifier, and at the start of each of your turns you win
temporary hit points equal to 1d6 plus your skill modifier.

Increased senses – You gain wide eyes, wide and graceful ears
mustaches. You get dark vision up to 60 feet if you didn't have it already
, you have the advantage over wisdom (perception) checks to detect
creatures within 60 feet, and no creature within 30 feet of you can make
an attack roll with advantage against you, unless you are
unable.

Mobility – Your hands and feet become scratched, and
lying down, you could germinate a tail. Your speed increases by 10 feet, you
can climb at your speed and your jump distance is tripled.

Shifting skin – Your skin changes color, even texture, adapts
effortlessly to your surroundings. You have an advantage over dexterity
(stealthy) check, and while you're still against a
irregular surface, you are considered invisible until you attack, move,
or cast a spell.

design – Would it be possible to abstract multi-threading capability for programs that were not originally designed for this?

Would it be possible to provide (or more) multi-core threading capability for programs that were not originally designed for this?

And this by creating a "virtual" processor core (or for i7s with hyperthreading, virtual "virtual cores") which, for a program, the program sees it as a single core / thread, but of the other next to this virtual core is a program / tool / utility that spreads the work across multiple cores / threads alone? And for programs already designed for multi-core support, the virtual core allows an increase in the number of usable cores.

I think that would be useful given the trend in recent years to increase the number of cores compared to the overall increase in processor speed instead of CPU running against the "ceiling" of Moore's Law and the seemingly slow or dragging push of software development to take advantage of these growing number of processor cores.

I realize that something like this would probably not be simple or easy to accomplish, but most of all I wonder if it would be doable.

Is it really a coincidence that video capability is available to Nikon DSLRs with CMOS sensors?

It's more a question of speculation, but I think it's a good theoretical question about the CCD and their use of the battery.

The Nikon D80 with its batteries can take 700 photos during the first charge and 1400 during the third charge.

What I speculate is. The Nikon D90 was the first Nikon digital SLR with video capability and the first Nikon SLR with CMOS sensor. Maybe the CCD is the reason why video capture capacity came late to the DSLR market?

Did Nikon ever say that video capability was due to CMOS or that cameras started using CMOS because of video capability as a selling point?

Things get even more suspicious when you realize that Nikon's flagship SLRs were using the proprietary JFET-LBCAST technology, but Nikon's first flagship SLR could be viewed in D3 mode and could only be viewed live. which is about to record videos. The first Nikon DSLR capable of filming was D3S. The difference lies in these live / video CMOS sensors used by the DSLRs after abandoning the proprietary sensor technology. The problem is that the D90, which arrived later than the D3, had video capability, but the first Nikon DSLR camera with video capability was the D3S, which arrived a year later. It becomes confusing when you realize that D2X was the first Nikon digital SLR to use CMOS technology but without live display.

Maybe there was an agreement between Sony and Nikon or maybe they wanted to sell a professional DSLR with a video function to create D3S later, while users looking for video would buy a Nikon D90 also supports FX lenses.

So, does the sensor type have anything to do with video / live view or vice versa? Especially in the case of Nikon?

This is not exactly the same part though. Theoretically, how long will the D80 capture the video or will it live view with its CCD sensor compared to the CMOS D90?

Amazon Web Services – Traffic Processing Capability for 1 EC2 Instance for t3.2xlarge

Protocol exchange between the telephone server and the IOT (interregional) device. let's say that there are 100,000 users and that everyone requests or uses 12 to 20 times a day can be approximately at the same time (the protocols are very small, less than 1 KB), so I have to create instances for Protocol exchange and automatic scaling, each transfer is stored as a log and backup up to 1000 GB

Here is my example user buying idea -> Route53 -> Elastic Beamstalk -> I am -> RDS -> S3 -> Cloud Front

I need the traffic handling capability for 1 instance EC2 for t3.2xlarge – vCPU's 8 – Memory – 32GB, ie. I need to know how many queries it can handle at once to estimate the cost by calculating the number of EC2 instances that I will use. and also need someone to rectify my instance purchase if all

usability – in-app chat capability

I am creating a product for the police force for task management. The chat built into the application would be one of the features of this app so that they can coordinate with each other with regards to their task.

They use WhatsApp as a communication tool, but my company would like them to fully integrate into our application. Should we implement an in-app chat as advanced as WhatsApp or would this pose a problem (for example: crashing the application because it is too heavy)? Would the copy functionality of the other messaging services help us to change the platform of discussion? Or is it better to just implement an in-app chat feature such as Twitter / Instagram and not try to replace their current platform?

dnd 5th – Does a duergar NPC need to focus to maintain its enlargement capability?

In the MM, page 122, nothing mentions the need to maintain the concentration, and nothing in the wording indicates that the Duergar's Expand ability is a spell.

This contrasts with the invisibility action of the duergar who says explicitly that he must maintain his concentration.

So my interpretation is that it's a kind of innate magical ability, not a spell, that would not require concentration. Is it ok or am I missing something?

dnd 5th – Does a duergar NPC need to focus to maintain its enlargement capability?

In the MM, page 122, nothing mentions the need to maintain the concentration, and nothing in the wording indicates that the Duergar's Expand ability is a spell.

This contrasts with the invisibility action of the duergar who says explicitly that he must maintain his concentration.

So my interpretation is that it's a kind of innate magical ability, not a spell, that would not require concentration. Is it ok or am I missing something?