claims – How to correctly configure LDAPCP?

I just configured the LDACP * .wsp package to find and resolve users from external LDAP in SharePoint 2016.
Then I started to check how it works, but when I started the search, I got the results below:
(Entries with prefix (EmailAddress) and without)

enter description of image here

My complaints are configured as follows:

enter description of image here

What I would like to achieve is to have only entries without a prefix (EmailAddress) but with the possibility of searching by email and account name.
Which is also imported once the user is resolved, I would like to add it to the group with an account like: i: 0g.t | users | S-1-5-21-3286968501-24975625-1618430583
So SID instead of windowsaccountname.

Thanks help!

The phone simply claims to move the data from the application to external storage?

My internal memory is full, so I bought an SD card and am trying to move some application data. For example, I have 20 GB of data for Audible, which is my main concern.

I went to Settings> Applications> Audible and that was what it said Storage: 20 GB used in internal storage.

I clicked on Storage> Change and selected the SD card and I lifted a loader informing me of the progress of moving my data. Now Audible says I'm using 20 GB of external data.

But storage in Device Manager always says that my internal memory is full and that I only have an insignificant amount of data, 2 GB among others, on the SD card! But just below this summary, it says that it has 20 GB of application data on the SD card. I only use 2 / 60GB, but at the same time, it tells me that I have 20 GB of application data on it?

It doesn't match, what's going on? I tried to restart the phone.

WOW 6.6 million more jobless claims last week: we are now over 16 million job cuts in 3 weeks. Trump supporters: is it a "winner"?

Tell me the country that wins and let me know what the President is doing that Trump should do.

You can't blame Trump for the virus from China.

You can blame China for wasting time when this epidemic could have been stopped. Local communist officials have silenced doctors who could have warned the public before the huge Chinese New Year banquet attended by 40,000 people in Wuhan. If they had just canceled their New Years celebration and started quarantine immediately, the world would have been spared this horrible pandemic.

Democrats must support President A and put the blame where it belongs. The Chinese Communist Party.

wallet – Bitcoin sent, recipient claims not to have been received

The address received 0.07014343 BTC in 3d727e3f4565e011c0348f813c2d5480210b6bae2003a0f7abaa949d1a7c599a. These coins have already been spent, so at least the recipient's wallet provider is aware of the transaction. Depending on the type of wallet, the recipient's account may not have been credited due to internal system problems.

Alternatively, the recipient has received the funds and is trying to scam you for an additional payment.

In either case, your initial transaction is successful and the recipient must work with their wallet provider. You should no longer send them money.


Check if a transaction is completed

Due to the attention this question receives, I will review some of the best practices when verifying the purpose / completion / status of a transaction.

For a Bitcoin transaction to be complete and irreversible, it must be mined in a block.

To check if a transaction has been retrieved, you can check a block explorer. Block explorers are websites that read blockchain information and make it accessible to people who are not running their own node. Some commonly used explorers for Bitcoin are blockchain.com, blockchair.com, blockstream.info and btc.com (no affiliation with any of them).

When searching for the transaction, as with the link above, a page detailing the transaction is displayed, or a form of error not found.

If a transaction is not found, it almost certainly has not been retrieved – in this case, you should aim to retransmit the transaction instead of sending a new one. It is possible that the transaction has been broadcast and is not yet retrieved by the explorer, so sending a second one may result in a double payment.

If a transaction is found, it can be listed as unconfirmed. In this case, wait until it is confirmed. If a transaction is already confirmed, you should see an indication of the block in which it was retrieved (in the form of a block number or a block hash starting with a group of 0). If a transaction is confirmed, it is complete and irreversible.

Recipient says he did not receive the coins

There are a handful of scenarios in which the recipient may not see the coins even after the transaction is complete:

  1. Recipient's wallet is not synchronized / does not update properly – this is a more common scenario when using Exchange or other hosted wallets, or using a standard wallet with an uneven or weak Internet connection. In this case, the recipient should check with their wallet provider to locate and credit the coins.
  2. The address is incorrect – Either you made a mistake when copying the address, or the recipient provided an incorrect address. In this case, you need to work with the recipient to determine who should absorb the loss since the parts are probably unrecoverable.
  3. The recipient attempts to scam you – once the transaction is complete, only the recipient can access the parts, locate them, or attempt to use them otherwise. If they insist on not having received it, it is not due to a problem on your side and you risk being scammed.

To note

  1. Don't use a recipient-recommended explorer – it's trivial to build an explorer that hides certain transactions and makes you believe that they aren't complete when they are. Always use multiple third-party browsers if you must. Ideally, you should run your own instance of Bitcoin Core with -txindex activated and verify the transaction yourself, but this is not possible for many short-term users.
  2. If you really need to return the coins, first make a transaction on your own wallet which sends you the full balance and wait for this to be confirmed. This prevents you from accidentally paying twice if the original transaction simply was not posted correctly.
  3. Be patient – transactions with low fees can take a few days to be confirmed during periods of intense network activity – if you see an unconfirmed transaction, just wait.

Thailand – What to do when a taxi driver uses the meter but at the end of the trip clears the meter and claims that we agreed on a higher price for the trip?

I took a taxi to Bangkok, the driver used the meter, but at the end of the trip the driver cleared the meter (55 THB) and claimed that we had agreed to a higher price (100 THB) for the journey. Aside from the video recording of the driver clearing the meter or the whole trip, what can I do in this situation to pay the meter and not whatever the price of the taxi driver?


This question is not a duplicate How to distinguish scam taxis from legitimate taxis in Bangkok? Does it make sense to pre-book ?. I took a legitimate taxi, just the driver at one point wanted to try to make me some extra money. I want to know what should be the optimal course of action in my scenario.


I have transposed the question to:

VULTR opens complaint tickets and claims that they come from Google :) And more on abusive complaints

I manage a site that hosts Android applications, apk files, it's a fairly large site, with about 500,000 ads.
Recently I tried Vultr cloud hosting, the site of course has traffic, so I put an above-average load on the CPUs and the network.

I almost instantly started receiving Safe Browsing Report tickets in my Vultr account

Dear Customer,
We inform you of malware detected by Google on your servers. Please see the following alerts:

I looked through them, most of them were clean files, I analyzed them with ~ 50 antivirus software using the VirusTotal API, some of them had ad reports / adware and I deleted them, but just to be clear, these are the types of files that are also accepted on Google Play (same amount of false positives or files containing advertisements).

I tried to explain to them, they keep telling me that "Google is the complainant" and not them, I told them that if Google did send these complaints, then they must have an e- original mail or something similar.

After asking 3 times and they pretend not to see my question, they told me i had 48 hours to move my domain because my account will be closed.

– The actual files are not even under the Vultr network, they are under "download". subdomain because this other host offers unlimited traffic of 100 Mbps and the site does approximately 24 TB of traffic per month.
– I checked all the Google services (Google Webmaster console, Google secure browsing report), they all say that they have no registration and that the site is clean under these Google services.
– The site also runs Google AdSense ads, and they have strict policies for AdSense sites.

However, Vultr claims that Google sends these complaints but refuses to show me the original "complaint".
It looks like they just want me to go, because it's more profitable to host customers who pay and use fewer resources.

Due to the size of the site, there may also be legitimate complaints, there was one and I deleted this file in less than 24 hours. But I have found that many complaints are unreasonable, made by competitors. The DMCA law allows me to make a counter-notification to my knowledge.

Coinbase for example pays a company called RiskIQ in order to defeat its competitors, this company has reported most of the Bitcoin wallet apps on my site, claiming that they violate the copyright of Coinbase; these apps have nothing to do with Coinbase, besides being from other wallet providers. And ISPs like Vultr have their backs without minimal investigation. None of these complainants responded when you contact them.

You can also take everyone’s ads offline by making a fake DMCA complaint to Google, they will automatically take the ads offline, then activate them manually after proving that the complaint was abusive (takes ~ 7 days), then l & Attacker can instantly take them offline again. It’s crazy.

So Vultr, can I please see this Google complaint? Ticket # DHZ-84ODO

The search for M $ claims stinks today

Anti M $ preachers never miss an opportunity now, people.

I guess they have to come back to us on the other side at every opportunity.

Shawn, I think M $ will also use data centers powered by Linux servers, how do we know where they will be charging?

Perhaps this is a giant R&D project like IBM's WebFountain research project, distributed computing is the future and outsourcing research projects will also help these companies to find out more about these two areas.

Data centers will become so important in the future, they all rush to create their own versions and flavors, of course that M $ will use their own technology, can you think of a better way to do R & D.

Building a search engine is the best way to do it.

claims and drinks, the little man who knows how, and running the page

claims and drinks, the little man who knows how, and running page C through Koito's bud and everything in the book, and showing the page as a clown and not showing thanks thanks for the help preliminary

I have uninstalled the Android SDK, but the software manager in Eclipse claims that the Android SDK is up to date

I've encountered ADT errors with the Android SDK, and after trying many workarounds, moved files, copied files to the tools directory, etc., I finally decided to simply uninstall the Android SDK and start over again – but Eclipse think the SDK is still there, so now I can not reinstall it.

nginx – certbot claims to have worked, but fullchain.pem does not exist

I have a strange problem when setting up a new nginx server on a Debian 10 box with certbot.

Certbot claims to have succeeded and created the file I want …

# certbot certonly --standalone --preferred-challenges http -d picosite.kloshost.online
Saving debug log to /var/log/letsencrypt/letsencrypt.log
Plugins selected: Authenticator standalone, Installer None
Cert not yet due for renewal

You have an existing certificate that has exactly the same domains or certificate name you requested and isn't close to expiry.
(ref: /etc/letsencrypt/renewal/picosite.kloshost.online.conf)

What would you like to do?
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
1: Keep the existing certificate for now
2: Renew & replace the cert (limit ~5 per 7 days)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Select the appropriate number (1-2) then (enter) (press 'c' to cancel): 2
Renewing an existing certificate

IMPORTANT NOTES:
 - Congratulations! Your certificate and chain have been saved at:
   /etc/letsencrypt/live/picosite.kloshost.online/fullchain.pem
   Your key file has been saved at:
   /etc/letsencrypt/live/picosite.kloshost.online/privkey.pem
   Your cert will expire on 2020-02-21. To obtain a new or tweaked
   version of this certificate in the future, simply run certbot
   again. To non-interactively renew *all* of your certificates, run
   "certbot renew"
 - If you like Certbot, please consider supporting our work by:

   Donating to ISRG / Let's Encrypt:   https://letsencrypt.org/donate
   Donating to EFF:                    https://eff.org/donate-le

However, nginx does not start because it does not exist …

nginx: (emerg) BIO_new_file("/etc/letsencrypt/live/picosite.kloshost.onion/fullchain.pem") failed (SSL: error:02001002:system library:fopen:No such file or directory:fopen('/etc/letsencrypt/live/picosite.kloshost.onion/fullchain.pem','r') error:2006D080:BIO routines:BIO_new_file:no such file)
nginx: configuration file /etc/nginx/nginx.conf test failed

The tree shows the symbolic links are there …

/etc/letsencrypt/live
├── picosite.kloshost.online
│   ├── cert.pem -> ../../archive/picosite.kloshost.online/cert2.pem
│   ├── chain.pem -> ../../archive/picosite.kloshost.online/chain2.pem
│   ├── fullchain.pem -> ../../archive/picosite.kloshost.online/fullchain2.pem
│   ├── privkey.pem -> ../../archive/picosite.kloshost.online/privkey2.pem
│   └── README

And I can not see it either …

# ls -l /etc/letsencrypt/live/picosite.kloshost.onion/fullchain.pem
ls: cannot access '/etc/letsencrypt/live/picosite.kloshost.onion/fullchain.pem': No such file or directory

I have a group of other almost identical hosts. In this case, nginx is a reverse proxy using the SSL protocol. Here is the config for this specific …

server {
        listen 443 ssl;
        server_name picosite.kloshost.onion;
        ssl_certificate /etc/letsencrypt/live/picosite.kloshost.onion/fullchain.pem;
        ssl_certificate_key /etc/letsencrypt/live/picosite.kloshost.onion/privkey.pem;
        ssl_session_cache shared:SSL:10m;
        ssl_session_timeout 5m;
        ssl_prefer_server_ciphers on;
        ssl_ciphers ECDH+AESGCM:ECDH+AES256:ECDH+AES128:DH+3DES:!ADH:!AECDH:!MD5;
        ssl_protocols TLSv1 TLSv1.1 TLSv1.2;
        ssl_dhparam /etc/ssl/certs/dhparam.pem;
        add_header Strict-Transport-Security "max-age=63072000; includeSubdomains";

        location / {
                 proxy_pass_header Authorization;
                 proxy_pass http://127.0.0.1:8000;
                 proxy_set_header Host $host;
                 proxy_set_header X-Real-IP $remote_addr;
                 proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-For $proxy_add_x_forwarded_for;
                 proxy_http_version 1.1;
                 proxy_set_header Connection "";
                 proxy_buffering off;
                 client_max_body_size 0;
                 proxy_read_timeout 36000s;
                 proxy_redirect off;
        }
}

server {
        server_name picosite.kloshost.onion;
        listen 80;
        return 301 https://picosite.kloshost.onion$request_uri;
}