Monthly SEO and SMM for my Client for $10

Monthly SEO and SMM for my Client

This is a monthly SEO and SMM service for my client. Although anyone can order it!

Your website needs regular SEO and SMM in order to rank higher in the Google search engines and attract and get traffic and clients and sales from social media. So in this service we will do exactly that and do various high authority, high quality SEO and SMM marketing and promotion.

This is for the SEO and SMM of 1 URL per order per month and this is what you’ll get:

You’ll get (each URL):

  • 2500 mixed social signals.
  • 25 top social bookmarks.
  • 10 Pinterest group board pins.
  • 5 Tumblr blog posts.
  • 10 Facebook page posts to related fb pages.
  • And will throw in 25 mixed top social bookmarking profile links too.

All of these things are 100% Google friendly and white hat SEO and SMM.

They will be done gradually over a month’s time so nice and natural!

You’ll get a full report every month of all live URLs where your link is posted.

All we need minimum is your URL. But if you have any #hashtags let us have them too.

Work will start the same day you order.

.(tagsToTranslate)SEO(t)SMM

How do you handle dedicated server client who is using high electricity 24/7?

Title.

How do you handle them? Like its kinda obvious that they are mining or something, which is against your TOS, but you cannot verify i… | Read the rest of https://www.webhostingtalk.com/showthread.php?t=1852631&goto=newpost

networking – Do I have to duplicate implementations on a client server udp application

I think the question is pretty straight forward but just to clarify, if the client and server are separate machines and need to be able to communicate with each other, does that mean that certain aspects such as synchronization, ack packets, re transmitting, timeouts, etc need to duplicated between the client and server?

For example, if i creating a polling program that switches between sending and receiving messages, would I need to have the same service on the client and the server?

I know somethings will be different. For example the way a client handles inputs from the server may be different then how the server processes input from the client.

postgresql – Postgres subscription cannot replicate a few tables – FATAL: connection to client lost

I’m having trouble with a few tables that will not replicate on Postgres 13. I’ve set up a subscription to listen to a publication.

I can see three workers hanging since select srsubstate from pg_subscription_rel returns d (copying), while the remaining workers are r (ready).

In my postgresql.log file I can see that these tables are not being copied:

FATAL:  connection to client lost
STATEMENT:  COPY public.table_name TO STDOUT
LOG:  could not send data to client: Broken pipe

I’m prototyping locally right now between two Postgres databases on different ports. Any idea why I might be experiencing this and how I can resolve it? Does it have anything to do with missing pg_wal files? These are not the largest tables I have, I’m really scratching my head. For the tables that do replicate successfully, they are right though. Dropping the subscriptions/publications and re-instantiating them reproduces the same issue.

http – How to properly notify a client from the server side in Golang (broadcasting)?

http – How to properly notify a client from the server side in Golang (broadcasting)? – Software Engineering Stack Exchange

Keycloak client baseurl is not accepting url without http

I am developing react app. And keeping keycloak for signup. After completing signup keycloak is triggering an email for email verification. When the user verify I want to redirect that verified user to this url e.g. com.abcd.xyzApp/(My app). But I am not able to set this URL(com.abcd.xyzApp/) in keycloak baseurl without http. Getting error “Error! Base URL is not a valid URL”

Is there any solution? Thanks

authentication – How to authenticate OAuth2 confidential client is making a REST call?

We are looking to implement some REST services to be called from partner servers (not end users via a browser).

The out-of-the-box implementation seems to flow thusly:

  1. Partner server passes a client id and client secret to our OAuth server, which will use them to generate and pass back an access key
  2. Partner passed the access key as a bearer token in the HTTP request header on every API call

Is this how OAuth2 is supposed to work for confidential clients?

How is client id / client secret different from a username and password? It seems that the can become copied or compromised to allow anyone with network access to our service to forge a request. Granted, that mostly just includes employees, but we need to secure against them too. It also seems that we are trusting our partners to keep the client id and client secret secure but that, if they fail to do so, it is OUR services that get put at risk.

Is there a stronger way to authenticate that the server making a REST call really is the server that we want to authorize? E.g., can X.509 client certificates be used? Would that be normal / state of the art?

seo – Need to publish an ad but alt text and url aren’t what client wants- how do I change it?

I have a client who wants the following to appear when their ad is inspected:
Dimensions: 640×400

File: sports betting site Betway 640×400.jpg

Alt: sports betting site Betway Canada

URL: https://betway.com/en/sports

Our plug in doesn’t allow for changing the alt, and I have included their URL which directs to the site, but when the link ad is inspected, the URL shows our site location: www.bigeasymagazine.com….

Is there a way for me to edit the ad to include their information?

linux – WireGuard Port-forwarding from Client in the Host

i’m trying to connect a port from a wireguard client to the host network of the server.

I tried to do it with IPtables but I always get the reply of “unreachable”

It seems that my configuration could be the problem?

Thanks!


TEST Connection

root@wiretest3:~# curl -I 10.7.0.2:6060
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Server: nginx/1.20.1
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2021 10:37:38 GMT
Content-Type: text/html
Content-Length: 988
Last-Modified: Sat, 17 Jul 2021 10:07:05 GMT
Connection: keep-alive
ETag: "60f2abc9-3dc"
Accept-Ranges: bytes

root@wiretest3:~# curl -I 192.168.1.180:6060
curl: (28) Failed to connect to 192.168.1.180 port 6060: Connection timed out
root@wiretest3:~# curl -I 127.0.0.1:6060
curl: (7) Failed to connect to 127.0.0.1 port 6060: Connection refused

Server Config:

Host: 192.168.1.183
Wireguard network: 10.7.0.1

root@wiretest3:~# cat /etc/wireguard/wg0.conf
# Do not alter the commented lines
# They are used by wireguard-install
# ENDPOINT wireguard.demo.net

(Interface)
Address = 10.7.0.1/24
PrivateKey = QAOETAJYMK3PcDhN/y+xFJKcJetm4...........
ListenPort = 51823

# BEGIN_PEER client
(Peer)
PublicKey = YxM7cwbmBm7VIyNcRdDBhtiEwFWL........
PresharedKey = W9Y0qCku0Fv1uFiMpy5ImStbs+.........
AllowedIPs =  10.7.0.2/32, 192.168.1.183/32
# END_PEER client

IP a

root@wiretest3:~# ip a
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000
    link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
    inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
    inet6 ::1/128 scope host 
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
2: eth0@if47: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP group default qlen 1000
    link/ether 2e:f5:1e:38:32:06 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff link-netnsid 0
    inet 192.168.1.183/24 brd 192.168.1.255 scope global eth0
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
    inet6 fe80::2cf5:1eff:fe38:3206/64 scope link 
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
3: wg0: <POINTOPOINT,MULTICAST,NOARP,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1420 qdisc mq state UNKNOWN group default qlen 500
    link/none 
    inet 10.7.0.1/24 scope global wg0
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
    inet6 fe80::6613:2cc4:bb7d:6bd4/64 scope link stable-privacy 
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever

Client Config:

root@wiredocker:/etc/wireguard# cat /etc/wireguard/wg0.conf
(Interface)
Address = 10.7.0.2/24
DNS = 8.8.8.8, 8.8.4.4
PrivateKey = GAF31cqwu2YSWQPdiSvlWie2Pma.........

(Peer)
PublicKey = 3VMnaI8JvoXZ6DthLcDy5MnVmNq..............
PresharedKey = W9Y0qCku0Fv1uFiMpy5ImStbs+...............
AllowedIPs = 0.0.0.0/0, ::/0, 192.168.1.0/24
Endpoint = wireguard.demo.net:51823
PersistentKeepalive = 25

IP a

root@wiredocker:/etc/wireguard# ip a
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000
    link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
    inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
    inet6 ::1/128 scope host 
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
2: eth0@if12: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP group default qlen 1000
    link/ether 76:d3:5b:64:b4:f0 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff link-netnsid 0
    inet 192.168.178.178/24 brd 192.168.178.255 scope global eth0
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
    inet6 fe80::74d3:5bff:fe64:b4f0/64 scope link 
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
4: docker0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP group default 
    link/ether 02:42:bb:9b:28:90 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
    inet 172.17.0.1/16 brd 172.17.255.255 scope global docker0
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
    inet6 fe80::42:bbff:fe9b:2890/64 scope link 
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
10: veth508c767@if9: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue master docker0 state UP group default 
    link/ether ea:cd:96:6e:33:0b brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff link-netnsid 1
    inet6 fe80::e8cd:96ff:fe6e:330b/64 scope link 
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
15: wg0: <POINTOPOINT,NOARP,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1420 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000
    link/none 
    inet 10.7.0.2/24 scope global wg0
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever

In which order are pac4j client used

I have an application using pac4j and use multiple authentication clients to secure my routes (both direct and indirect) like this: Secure("AnonymousClient", "FacebookClient", "JWTClient").
I don’t really understand in which order the clients are used though. It seems to be from right to left and 401 is returned if none of the clients could build a profile. Am I right?
Is it the same order for the authorizers?

DreamProxies - Cheapest USA Elite Private Proxies 100 Private Proxies 200 Private Proxies 400 Private Proxies 1000 Private Proxies 2000 Private Proxies 5000 Private Proxies ExtraProxies.com - Buy Cheap Private Proxies Buy 50 Private Proxies Buy 100 Private Proxies Buy 200 Private Proxies Buy 500 Private Proxies Buy 1000 Private Proxies Buy 2000 Private Proxies ProxiesLive.com Proxies-free.com New Proxy Lists Every Day Proxies123.com Buy Cheap Private Proxies; Best Quality USA Private Proxies