5th dnd – Does the confusion caused by the invocation of the dreaded word count as a warlock spell?

According to the answers to the question "What makes a spell cast is considered a spell {class}?", It follows that something is a "class spell." "it's on the spell list of this class."

As far as I know, no other general criteria for what makes something a warlock / wizard / etc. to spell.

I also have the impression that spending a warlock spell slot does not automatically make this spell a warlock spell, given the multiclash rules allowing wizards / etc. Spells to cast via warlock spell slots.

The rules state that "To cast any of your level 1 or higher warlock spells, you must use a hex box", and "The warlock board indicates the number of spell locations required for cast your warlock spells. " […]Dreadful Word's formulation could also be analyzed as an example of "specific general beats" for launching a non-warlock spell via warlock spell locations, regardless of these rules ( is already allowing you to cast a spell you do not know, after all).

Multiclass rules also give me the impression that spending a spell slot of a specific class – say, warlock – does not mean that the spell gotten is anyway a spell; you can, for example, cast wizard spells with Covenant magic slots and they still count as wizard spells.

So: since confusion is not on the list of warlock spells, confusion a warlock spell when it is cast via Dreadful Word for the Pact Keeper's wand?

(Note: I've added the rules-as-written tag because it seems extremely clear that it should count as a warlock spell – there is no implication of what DC should use if you are not supposed to use your warlock spell to save DC ("Charisma is your ability to cast spells for your warlock"), for example, I would never intend to argue the opposite in the real game, I just wonder what the literal interpretation is.)

Separable equations vs exact question [confusion]

In separable differential equations of the form:

$ M (x, y) dx + N (x, y) dy = 0 $

We can separate the variables and then integrate both sides to get the solution $ y = f (x) $ to the differential equation.

In such an equation, when integrating, we can not consider $ y $ constant because what we are looking for is a solution curve in which $ y $ that depends on $ x $ who has the slope $ frac {dy} {dx} $.

On the other hand, if we have an exact suppose all the conditions are right for that to be correctequation of the same form,

$ M (x, y) dx + N (x, y) dy = 0 $

What we are doing is trying to find a function $ psi (x, y) = c $ that satisfies the exact differential equation, but the difference here ( and that's where I'm confused) when we integrate, for example,

$ M (x, y) = left ( frac { partial psi} { partial x} right) $

When we integrate this last expression, we hold $ y $ constant! Why are we doing this? Is it because we solve an implicit function in $ x $ and $ y $ [[[[$ psi = c]$? But if we solve an implicit function, what is the meaning of $ frac {dy} {dx} $ then? I hope my question was clear, thank you.

complex analysis – Confusion on the main value of arg (z)

I misunderstood the concept of principle value when I was looking for proof of why $ z ^ {1/2} $ is discontinuous on the negative real axis. I understand the proof (all the proofs that I checked, use the fact that if we approach -1 in $ i $ and if we approach -1 in the sense of cw, the limit is $ -i $. Ok, I understood that, but I started to feel this discontinuity, it's only because of how we defined our main value of arg z which (-π, π)

What to do if we initially set this principle value must be taken as [0,2π]. Now, if I approach the same -1 in ccw and cw sense around the circle of units, is not it true that the limit will be $ i $ in both ways? I am a beginner in this class. Please help. Thank you.

Article CornerStone Confusion | Talk Web Hosting

Hi guys, I'm new to WordPress and SEO, I've heard about the "Cornerstone" article, which means that if articles with keywords are present on a site, the one you want to rank in the SERP brand is a fundamental article. ok understood that.

but what happens if we operate an "information site"? in this case, there is a lot of news related to a subject. Let's say "Fuchsia OS" there are leaks and rumors but the main keyword remains the same in this case, how to use this "cornerstone"?

in the end, are things okay if we do not use something cornerstone and continue to publish covering the same key word for news and other things related to that?

A ♪♪♪♪♪ vs IOS

We have seen the factors that would help choose the platform to use for your first mobile applications, the sad truth remains: there is no yes or no answer to the platform with which startups have to go among the market share of Aan vs ios us.
.

However, although we have trouble finding you an answer to 'An ♪♪♪♪♪ vs iOS: which platform should be chosen by the startups', we give you the answer to the question "When."

When should startups choose iOS first

If you want to integrate the target demographics of the app store, you need to put the first mobile application of your startup on iOS, spending your expenses in an iPhone application development company. Plus, if you're not influenced by the ability of an app to like and be moved to the home screen, the less fragmented world of Apple can s & # 39; Prove useful because you will not have to waste time creating your app for multiple devices.

The advantages of concentration and the ability to generate high revenues make the development of iPhone applications advantageous for business.

When should startups choose An- ♪♪♪♪♪ First

You should start with An- ♪♪♪♪♪ if your audience is not focused on a specific place. Plus, if there are lots of customization basics in your mobile app, use An ♪♪♪♪♪. The benefits of the scope and customization provided by the platform make it almost indispensable for companies to have an An ♪♪♪♪♪ application.

When do startups need to choose both An An and iOS
Vs iOS: what platform that start-ups should choose for the first mobile application also have a third option, one that ends the confusion between iPhone or An – Launch the application on An ♪♪♪♪♪ and on iOS.

If the selection is to be chosen as a solution by companies with sufficient time and money, you need to invest in mobile application development companies that specialize in the development of multiplatform applications in order to seize the opportunity to enjoy the best of all.

Now that we have seen everything – The factors that affect the choice of iOS vs iOS for startups and situations in which we consider that one is better than the other – now is the time to answer a very futuristic and logical question – When does a company have to go from one platform to another?

When does your startup need to extend from one platform to another?

The answer to this question lies in the fact that your application uses all the advantages of the current platform. If your app has reached a point where it now generates constant revenue from the App Store, expand it to Play Store for greater reach.

If your An ♪♪♪♪♪ app has gained enough followers on the Play Store, increase the extent of monetization by directing it to the App Store.

.

How to specify a circle of confusion and a depth of field in practice?

This question is related to this one; I ask the same question because I did not see in the answers how to arrive at a numerical answer in practice.

Suppose I make a portrait and most other parameters are calculated:

Sensor size: full frame; focal length: 100 mm; distance from subject: 1.5 meters; Wanted DoF: something like "would like the face to be clean and the rest to be blurry on the 8×10 prints".

Now I want to calculate the aperture that would help me take this picture. I need to clarify two things for this:

First, I need to ensure that the concepts of "sharp" and "blurry on 8×10 prints" are digital; that is, I have to decide how big the circle of confusion is on a complete frame that separates "net" from "blur".

Second, I need to assign a numerical value to the depth of focus, which would make the face sharp and the wall behind the subject blurred.

So the questions:

  1. Which numerical values ​​for the circle of confusion correspond to the scenario above?

  2. What are the appropriate DoF values ​​for portraits?

pathfinder – How does Dominate Person and Confusion interact?

Based on overlapping rules of enchantment effects (added emphasis)

Sometimes magic effects that establish mental control make each other unimportant, such as spells that suppress the subject's ability to act. Mental checks that do not eliminate the recipient's ability to act usually do not interfere with each other. If a creature is under the mental control of two or more creatures, it tends to obey each of its abilities and the measure of control that each effect allows. If the controlled creature simultaneously receives conflicting orders, competing controllers must perform opposite charismatic checks to determine which of these is obeyed.

… both spells are still effective. The affected creature, here Carol, will start for Confusion first, then do what Bob wants on a 01-25.

Turing Machines – Confusion on the evidence of the undecidability of REGULAR TM in Sipser's book

In Michael Sipser's book "Introduction to the Theory of Computation", there is an example of undecidable languages ​​in which there is a REGULR_TM language described as follows:

REGULAR_TM = { | M is a Turing machine and L (M) is a normal language.
Well, Sipser says it's an undecidable language because we can not have a decision maker to decide that language. Because if we could, we could create a TM that would decide an ATM that we previously know is undecidable. so that could cause a contradiction.
Here is the proof of this book:

Evidence. We let R be a TM that decides to REGULARtm and build TM S to decide on Atm. Then S works in the following way.

S = "In input, where M is a TM and w is a string:

  1. Build the next TM M2.

    M2 = "On the input x:

            1. If x has the form 0 ^ n 1 ^ n, accept.
    
    2. If x does not have this form, run M on input w and accept if M accepts w. "
    
  2. Execute R as input .

  3. If R accepts, accepts; if R rejects, rejects. "

My question is: is this type of construction of a TM S correct?
the part that really baffles me is the part that says "throw M on input w and accept if M accepts w". That's the question for Atm. If we could answer this question, why do we need an M2 machine to feed it into the R and produce the result of R. We have just "cast M on w".

Also for some languages ​​that [we know] are decidable, we can have the same argument and conclude that it is not decidable.

homological algebra – example of spectral sequence diagonal map confusion

I'm trying to go around the spectral sequences. So let's build a very basic example to apply the definitions and follow the movements. My filtered chain complexes are:

$ F_2C_ *: 0 rightarrow mathbb {Z} xrightarrow {i_1} mathbb {Z_1} oplus mathbb {Z_2} xrightarrow {p_2} mathbb {Z} rightarrow $ 0

$ F_1C_ *: 0 rightarrow 0 rightarrow mathbb {Z} _2 xrightarrow {p_2} mathbb {Z} rightarrow $ 0

$ F_0C _ *: $ The zero complex.

Right here $ i_1 $ and $ p_2 $ are the inclusion and projection maps, as well as the sub-indices of the $ mathbb {Z} s $ are just for labeling purposes.

With $ Z ^ r_ {p, q} $ defined as $ {x in F_pC_q: partial x in F_ {p-r} C_ {q-1} } / F_ ​​{p-1} C_q $, the differential is supposed to be limited to well-defined maps $ d ^ r: Z ^ r_ {p, q} rightarrow Z ^ r_ {p-r, q-1} $.

But in my example the map $ Z ^ 1_ {2,2} rightarrow Z ^ 1_ {1,1} $ does not seem to be well defined:

$ Z ^ 1_ {2,2}: = {x in mathbb {Z} oplus mathbb {Z}: p_2 x in mathbb {Z} } / mathbb {Z} _2 free mathbb {Z} _1 $,

$ Z ^ 1_ {1,1}: = mathbb {Z} $.

however $[(a,b)]$ and $[(a,b’)]$ in $ Z ^ 1_ {2,2} $ to be sent to $ b $ and $ b $ in $ mathbb {Z} $ respectively, even if $[(a,b)] = [(a,b’)]$.

I can not see where I made a mistake, but I'm pretty sure something is wrong. Where did I go wrong?

Confusion about `unloadwallet`

The way the unloaded portfolios behave in Bitcoin Core v0.17.0.1 does not seem clear to me.

If I create a new wallet with create a portfolio, add a receipt address with the help of importmulti, then unload it using unloadwallet:

  1. Will Bitcoind still detect payments to the addresses of this portfolio? (seems yes)
  2. If so, will this detection only occur when I use loading wallet again? (seems yes)
  3. If yes, will this require a new analysis of (recent) blocks? (I'm worried about the time it could take, if it's been months or years since I last loaded this wallet.)
  4. If so, will this pose a problem on a pruned knot?
  5. If this is the case, should I avoid this multi-wallet feature on a pruned node or is there a safe way to use it without risking big uploads? (for example, never unload it)