search – Allow the Highlighted Content Web Part in SharePoint Online to display draft items?

I use the Highlighted Content Web Part to view documents from multiple document libraries in SharePoint Online. I have learned that it can only display drafts if "Draft Security" is set to "All Users Can Read Items" in the document libraries. It's not ideal because I do not want anyone to see or edit drafts while it's just visualizing documents – only those who have permission to edit it .

As noted in How to make drafts appear in search results, one of the suggestions is to allow the content access account to the associated libraries. I want to do that – but I do not know the name of the account. Can any one say the name of the account?

XXXXX Content of the user Descriptions 450% actually still have the same file -. :: GSA SEO & Marketing Forum ::.

I mean, if I use it in two places, it will display the same thing after pressing the "TEST" button both "about yourself" and "description 450"

does it work normally and the test does not work properly? or anyway to always take another file? because during the test, I have the same content indicating ffor description 450 and about yourself when the intention was to take 2 different files.

Thank you!

Content – How should I display large amounts of text when the user includes all available search criteria?

My application presents various articles to the user (mainly on entrepreneurship). To help the user to find articles that interest them, switchable buttons each represent different search criteria, including categories (artificial intelligence, success, finances, etc.) and formats (articles, diagrams, events, for example). ). The results of the selected criteria are shown below.

However, if all 10 keys were enabled, the amount of text displayed would be too large and unmanageable from the point of view of the user interface.

How should I resolve this situation and create an appropriate interface?

Is pagination a possible solution for me? If not, can you give me other ideas?

Advanced Custom Fields – ACF Flexible Content with Bootstrap Carousel Repeater

I'm trying to add a counter for each instance of this flexible content carousel built with Bootstrap. I've tried several ways to count with the while statement. What would be the right way to count so that I could add a unique identifier to each carousel? Thank you

content – How to organize large quantities of texts after several Ajax calls?

Sorry if this question is stupid, I try to find the most appropriate way to process a content presentation.

I have 10 category buttons on one page, each assigned to a div.

On these divs, I would show the results Ajax, by clicking on their specific button.

However, if all 10 keys were enabled, the amount of text displayed would be too large and unmanageable from the point of view of the user interface.

How should I resolve this situation and create an appropriate interface?

Is Ajax pagination a possible solution for me? How to combine separate Ajax calls with a generic paging system? If not, can you give me other ideas?

thank you,

Read the content of the Facebook page via an API

Does anyone know a way to read the contents of a Facebook page behind the API?

I need to specifically read the contents of the About tab as well as the messages.

The articles even found the way, but I did not find anything about reading the content of About.

Does anyone know how to do it, please?


usability – arrangement in 3 columns for a song site. Left / right sidebar and content between them

So I work on a website, an anime to be precise, where people can read articles on their songs, rate them, comment on them / post comments, add them to their list, etc., and here is the layout current site of a song.

I think it's decent, and I intend to keep it that way, but I'd like to know what others, maybe some experts think of this layout .

As you can see, in the office view, there is a left sidebar menu(which can not be closed), and there is another one on the right, which contains information about the song, such as integrated youtube video, statistics, singer information (if any), anime and lyrics at the bottom of the page. The two side bars and the div between them are separately scrollable, but the scrollbars are hidden because IMO that would ruin the design / layout.

And between them the contents div is placed, it contains additional information about the song (statistics, song recommendations, comments section, etc.).

Their width goes like this: 20-65-15

Office view

Office view

On the mobile view, the right sidebar is pushed to the top of the content. divbecause it fits perfectly in the screen size of a phone and the menu (but without the search section) can be opened with the usual hamburger menu icon, but unlike most sites, it is placed at the bottom.

Mobile view

Mobile view

This layout is also convenient when the user wants to read any comments. On this site, the layout is always the same, so the right sidebar is always visible. But this time, it's only visible on view of the officeSo it's a privilege for those who visit the site on a PC.

Site of all comments

Do you think that such a provision would be suitable for users? Or is it not too unusual to have sidebars on both sides?

Magento 2.2.9 – Catalog Product – Multiple Store – Only the default content

We had to switch to Magento 2.2.9 recently.
It is a multilingual store, with content DE and EN. (view of the store)

Product descriptions in


are DE in DE-store and EN in EN-Store.

We use the default value for EN, then switch STORE-VIEW up on DE, disable the default CONTENT button in the DE store, and enter the DE description in the content.

But for 2.2.9 when disabling the DEFAULT button for CONTENT, the text box remains gray.
We can enter text and save. But when updating, the DE text disappeared and the button returned to DEFAULT.

The DESCRIPTION text box should go dark when the default check box is cleared, is not it? But it remains gray.

What's wrong?

Thank you for your help.

seo – Why would my different product pages with similar content have different rankings in the search engines?

We have a website on automotive products where we publish content for cars and motorcycles. This includes images, videos, prices, reviews, similar offers from the automobile.

We want to improve our Google SEO ranking for these product pages. To my surprise, few of these model pages rank first while others rank fifth, even though the quantity and quality of the content of these models are very similar. In addition, the ranking structure is stable for months, so it is not random. In addition, I compared the competition template pages for the same product page and this is also the same. Now, I wonder why Google ranks us down for a few products while higher for another product. Is there a way to identify the differences that explain this ranking difference?

I have checked some points but I could not get a convincing answer:

  1. Domain Score – Although the competition has a better DA but this does not explain why they rank lower for some models with identical content.
  2. Lighthouse Speed ​​Score / Google Page – We have better scores and page loss time here compared to the competition.
  3. Score page – I do not know if we can get this type of score for each template page.
  4. Time spent, bounce rate and exit rate – All of these indicators giving insights into user feedback have similar numbers for both models, where we rank 1 versus 5.
  5. The images / videos are there with a similar quality
  6. Pricing information is available for both
  7. Reviews are available for both
  8. Similar offers are available for both
  9. Both have a similar structured extract
  10. Title description URLs were formed with identical logic for all products

What should I see to identify this difference and check how to improve the rank of product pages with lower ranks?

Do Facebook and Twitter block or monetize content protected by copyright?

Do Facebook and Twitter currently apply monetization or blocking to copyrighted content? (like music used as a background in a video, for example).

The Google search only displays old information (two or three years ago) about how Facebook is about to start, how Facebook is developing its own Content-ID system, or about how how Facebook negotiates with music labels, but nothing about the rules in force. .