large Archives - New and Fresh Private + Public Proxies Lists Everyday!

dnd 5th – Do failures of automatic death saving throw caused by damage to 0 HP out of balance with large groups of small enemies?

This is not a problem unless the monsters intentionally take chances to carry knockouts for whatever reason.

In short, most creatures simply do not benefit from the intentional killing of ground PJs during a fight.

Many enemies are not smart and fight instinctively, without any tactics. If this is the case, then a monster that mortally wounds a player character will want to quickly move the focus to other characters that pose a more immediate threat.

Many enemies are fighting tactically or for any purpose. Once again, the smart option is usually to ignore the injured PC and focus on its allies, which pose an immediate threat. Completing unconscious PCs while there are still enemies alive is to plunder the battlefield before the end of the fight.

Among the sufficiently intelligent, brave and dedicated enemies to kill a PC when the fight is still going on, few of them have the necessary intention. You must be willing to risk your life and that of your allies, just to make sure that a guy dies immediately when he is already unconscious and that he bleeds to the ground and about twelve seconds from the death. Even in this case, it may be useful to capture live PCs, if possible, such as ransom, bond sale or interrogation for information.

How to configure G Suite for a large group of temporary users for access to low level documents?

I am chairman of the board and de facto IT manager of a small non-profit organization for youth development. We recently opted for G Suite to store email and files in the cloud. We have 3 "classes" of users: staff, board and youth. Staff has individual accounts in our G Suite environment. Board members have private Gmail accounts that provide access to team practices, etc. My question is about youth.

About 60 teenagers participate in our programs each year. We would like them to have access to various documents in the field via the Chromebooks we have. This group has unreliable access to the Internet and email at home, so the use of personal accounts is untenable. The group also has a high turnover rate. It would be tedious to create 60 individual user accounts and keep this list of users up-to-date.

The seemingly obvious solution is to create a single, "young" user, and to give access to this account to our program staff so that they can connect to a team player, for example on a Chromebook, and the give to one of our young people. can access all the documents they need.

I understand that G Suite is based on the assumption that each user is an individual human, and many features do not work well when this assumption is broken. However, in this scenario, I can not really think of another simple way to achieve what I need. Is there a better way to do this? Are there any unintended consequences of doing this this way that I should be aware of?

Thank you for your help and advices!
-Leif

Sort an array of large numbers (each programming language) [on hold]

enter an array of array elements (unlimited number of array elements). Then sort gradually. If you meet -1, keep the -1 position

WebHosting for large databases

WebHosting Tips for Large Database | Talk Web Hosting

& # 39;);
var sidebar_align = & # 39; right & # 39 ;;
var content_container_margin = parseInt (& # 39; 350px & # 39;);
var sidebar_width = parseInt (& # 39; 330px & # 39;)
// ->

WebHosting for large databases

Hello, I am new to WebHosting World and I could use your advice.
I have a large offline sqlite database (~ 100 GB) with 3 tables, each having 3 columns and millions of rows.
I want to create a website where users will query the database (ported to a server database such as MySQL) from the website. But I do not know what kind of web hosting is needed for that.
Could any one tell me in the right direction?

Thank you.

For the front end, you can use the web hosting of your choice, for the database you want to make sure that it is hosted on a VPS for optimal performance. I doubt that a host allows 100 GB of MYSQL data and you would be much better on a VPS to query the databases.

█ TrentaHost INC. || Services protected against fully managed DDoS attacks (NA – EU – Asia)
█ Host Reseller – Pure SSD | Litespeed | Imunify360 | CloudLinux | 24×7 Support | Messaging channels
█ SSD SSD fully managed and protected against DDoS attacks – cPanel / WHM | DDoS protection | Cryptons | Pure SSD
█ DDoS Protected Sites: Portland, OR (North America) | Amsterdam, NL (Europe) | Singapore (Asia)

I would say that a dedicated server with a fast processor, MEM and SSD drives is needed. This will help load queries as quickly as possible.

Fast Host – Cloud Hosting with LiteSpeed & Imunify360 Security
Backup Storage – Backup Storage with FTP, SSH and cPanel Access

Similar wires

answers: 5

Last post: 01-24-2017, 1:39 p.m.
answers: 2

Last post: 10-10-2011, 10:30
answers: 5

Last post: 12-25-2010, 8:46 p.m.
answers: 15

Last post: 09-02-2006, 0:23
answers: 4

Last post: 01-05-2006, 4:50 p.m.

Authorizations to publish

You Maybe not post new discussions
You Maybe not post answers
You Maybe not post attachments
You Maybe not edit your posts

Rules of the forum

Can not download a large file from Google Drive in one folder, always in several parts: /

I was able to download a file (more than 70 GB already loaded in zip file) without any problem 6 months ago, but now everything is divided into several zip files? Why is it?

Abstract algebra – Examples of a torsion group where there are elements of arbitrary large order.

I therefore want to find examples of torsion groups in which arbitrarily large order elements exist. This is a group $ G $ where for each $ n in mathbb {N} $, it exists $ g in $ G such as $ g ^ n = e $ (operation of $ G $ applied to $ g $ $ n $-times), where $ e $ is the element of identity. I could find an example whose existence might seem to imply Axiom of Choice. Consider modulo additive groups $ n $ and their product on all natural numbers.
$$ prod_ {n in mathbb {N}} mathbb {Z} _n $$
These are just sequences where $ n $-the element is from the additive group $ mathbb {Z} _n $. This is not yet the example, for example $ (1,1,1, ldots, … 1, ldots) $ infinite order. Consider a subgroup $ G leq prod mathbb {Z} _n $ of all sequences with a finite support. It is indeed a group with arbitrarily large order elements.

BUT … In order to show that there are even elements of $ prod mathbb {Z} _n $it is indeed necessary to invoke a form of choice. Of course not for elements of $ G $. My question is: can we find other examples, perhaps simpler ones?

Guidelines – Looking for a better presentation of a large number of attributes

I am looking for a way to display the information below on a web page. I am after a beautiful appearance. Currently, I present this information on a horizontal section of a single web page. I've considered using tabs, but the individual "table" that would be inside the tab would still look ugly.
It is possible to adjust the width and height of the columns, but the number of rows in each table is not under my control. It is also possible to delete the sub-table "tasks" and make it appear in a different place or in graph form. However, with all these minimal changes, the appearance would still be so bad!

In addition, the use of a tabbed widget would leave a lot of white space on both sides.

One last thing I thought was to change the rows and columns of each table, so that each of the 3 tables has only 2 wide lines. I do not think it would look good and also, if I had to add more entries in a table, there would be a problem.

Any suggestion / reference or example could help. Thank you.

Note: The data is wrong.

enter the description of the image here

co.combinatorics – Large finite subsets of Euclidean space without isosceles triangles (or approximately isosceles)

Here is a question in combinatorial geometry that is very similar to other questions I know but that I do not see how to get. I will actually propose two different questions on the same topic. The ongoing question is one I would really like to know the answer to, but the discrete question seems more "dominant" and easy to manage and the two are clearly linked.

Discrete question:

Let $ S $ to be a subset of the $ N times N $ grid such that not three distinct points of $ S $ (including colinear points) form an isosceles triangle. What size can $ | S | $ be? Can it be as big as $ N ^ {2- epsilon} $?

Ongoing question:

For $ beta> $ 0, we say a triangle in the Euclidean space is $ beta $-isosceles if a vertex is at a distance $ beta $ of the equidistant line between the two other vertices.

Let $ S $ to be a finite subset of $[0,1]^ d $ such as not three distinct points of $ S $ form a $ beta $-isosceles triangle. What is the minimum possible distance from Hausdorff between $ S $ and $[0,1]^ d $? In other words, what is the biggest $ alpha $ such as there must be a radius ball $ alpha $ containing no point of $ S $?

This is a question that I was going to pose as a challenge in an article I write that stems from a problem encountered in data science. I realized that it would be a good idea to check with people here if something is already known about it!

Of course, the unidimensional versions of these questions concern sets without arithmetic progressions with 3 terms, which are the object of an abundant literature. But I do not immediately see how to exploit these results to say anything about these problems, if it is to say that the solution to the discrete problem must be $ o (N ^ 2) $. Is there a version of Behrend's construction that applies to the case of the higher dimension?

gmail – How to move a large group of emails from a "wanted" group to a specific folder that I have already created?

The easiest way, which was 1. to search your emails 2. to select the emails you want to move, then 3. to fly over the folder button with the down arrow, was removed.

Now you must 1. search the emails 2. select the ones you want to move 3. label them with the appropriate label 4. right-click on the label you just created 5 click on move to 6. select the folder you want. move the emails to.

SQL Server – What is the best option for a large dimension lookup table that changes slowly

This question is an extension of a previously asked question. Index strategy and query optimization

I have implemented the two new indexes recommended by Ypercube. While the query for InsideIp search ended much faster (1.5 minutes 9 minutes), OutsideIp search is still in progress after 1.5 hours. I will let the query run over the weekend to see if it even ends. Note: The InsideIp list contains 3 DISTINCT IP addresses, while the OutsideIp list contains approximately 60,000 DISTINCT IP addresses.

I understand that the server may be constrained in terms of memory and that it probably needs more memory and possibly a combination of multiple processors and disks (for multiple database files allowing for more memory). LUN / stream optimization).

Before following this path, I reflect on three different approaches.

Modify the clustered index as mentioned previously (ProtocolKey, NetworkStartIpHex, NetworkEndIpHex, RowKey)
Place the search columns (ProtocolKey, NetworkStartIpHex, NetworkEndIpHex, RowKey) in a table in memory (OLTP).
Partition the table. But, you do not know how to effectively partition a column VARBINARY (16). I know that VARBINARY (MAX) is explicitly excluded by Microsoft, but is VARBINARY (16) also excluded?

Can any one give hints on what could be better?