Website Design – Should I Use Left Alignment or Centering in Webdesign?

There is nothing bad in itself for a centered alignment, you just
know how to properly assign one if you want to implement it
with any amount of success.

The first thing you need to learn is when not to implement a centered
alignment. The answer here is pretty simple: when you have a lot of
content.

It is very important in any design to analyze your goals. If a
the high degree of readability is one of them and he should often
to be, then the aesthetic appeal is often completely separate or even
directly in contradiction with this objective. The trick is to find the balance
between the two.

One of the first places where you can start thinking about setting up a
Fully centered layout is when you have very little content.

Make sure that if your entire layout is built on a center
alignment, you have a very simple design with only a few elements. Once
you start adding big blocks of text and a lot of images, the centered
alignments begin to appear messy. Also, try to build a solid left,
justified or even correct alignment for your page as a whole, then
experiment with selectively depositing in alignments centered in the key
areas such as titles. Finally, like a quick trick when you're in a
jam, try to pack portions aligned in the center in a box that goes with
flow from the rest of the page.

who is the worst of the liberal left or the conservative right?

The Conservatives, and I, a Conservative, say it.

Before 2016, my answer would certainly have been the Liberals. However, in 2016, the Conservatives began to support Trump (few supported it in 2015). Trump is a vile and disgusting human who does not care about America or Americans. He steals money, insults everyone, constantly lies, reveals military secrets, does everything for him, worries if working Americans are not paid, and so on. Yet the Conservatives still support this point of sale.

Before 2016, if someone had described Trump without going into the details of his policy, I would have said, "He is really a liberal. NO conservative would ever be such a shame for the human race. No conservative will support this vile man!
I was extremely shocked when people of my political ideology voted for him.

To all Liberals reading this, I am sorry to have misrepresented you three years ago.

.

Integration of int ^ {1} _ {- 1} frac {1} {3} sinh ^ {- 1} left ( frac {3 sqrt 3} {2} (1-t ^ 2) right) dt

Recently I came across (in this regard.
$ href {https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/983830/closed-form-of-int-0-pi-frac-sinx-sqrtx3x1-dx/3050507#3050507} {post} $ from the hyperbolic solution to the cubic equation for a real root given by,
$$
t = -2 sqrt frac {p} {3} sinh left ( frac {1} {3} sinh ^ {- 1} left ( frac {3q} {2p} sqrt frac { 3} {p} right) right)
$$

Intuitively, I sought to find the integrally related,
$$
I = int ^ {1} _ {- 1} frac {1} {3} sinh ^ {- 1} left ( frac {3 sqrt 3} {2} (1-t ^ 2) right) dt
$$

Unfortunately, there was no solution in closed form. However, the Integral is incredibly close $ sqrt $ 2.
$$
I = 0.8285267994716327, frac {I} {2} + 1 = 1.4142633998
$$

To investigate more, I tried a $ href {https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/2964140/deriving-sqrt2-approx-1-frac13-frac13-cdot-4-frac13-cdot-4-cdoBuch- expansion of the integral in the Egyptian fractions. Although this becomes problematic after the 4th term,
The first four terms are,
$$
frac {I} {2} +1 = 1+ frac {1} {2} – frac {1} {12} – frac {1} {416}
$$

Here the denominators can be $ href {https://oeis.org/A324616}{given}$ by,
$$
a_n = sum_ {k = 0} ^ {n} {} ^ nC_k (2 ^ n – 2 ^ kq) ^ {n-k} q ^ k, q = sqrt 2
$$

Similarly, the denominators of the expansion of $ sqrt $ 2 are related to Pell numbers. Therefore, I find not only a closed-form expression, but also a possible serial-form solution related to a special type of numbers (like Pell numbers and Fibonacci numbers) or in terms of special polynomials. Thank you for any help.

mysql – Why the output is bad after doing the left join as a subquery

j & # 39; I TWO QUESTION that work perfectly, but when I join these two queries as LEFT JOINT the output becomes false. So what's the problem.?

Query 1:

select Batsman.innings_no,
bowler
sum (balls) as B,
ifnull (sum (Runs_In_Over), 0) as R,
ifnull (sum (Zero), 0) is equal to 0,
ifnull (sum (Oven), 0) at 4s,
ifnull (sum (Six), 0) than 6s
from (SELECT A.innings_no,
A. Bowler,
to count (*) in balls,
Sum (B.Runs_Scored) As 'Runs_In_Over',
B.runs_scored box
when 0 then counts (*) ends like zero,
B.runs_scored box
when 4 then counts (*) ends with four,
B.runs_scored box
when 6, then (*) ends with Six
FROM `database`.ball_by_ball A
INNER JOIN `database`.batsman_scored B
using (match_id, over_id, ball_id, innings_no)
where match_id = 981018
and innings_no = 2
GROUP BY A.innings_no, A.bowler, B.runs_scored) as Batsman
group by innings_no, bowler's order by bowler;

Query 2:

select innings_no,
bowler
ifnull (sum (Wides), 0) as WD,
ifnull (sum (NoBalls), 0) as NB,
sum (Extra_runs) as Extra
from (SELECT D.innings_no,
D. Bowler,
case E.extra_type_id
when 2 then counts (*) end up as Wides,
case E.extra_type_id
when 4, then (*) ends with NoBalls,
Sum (E.Extra_Runs) As' Extra_runs & # 39;
FROM `database`.ball_by_ball D
INNER JOIN `database & # 39; .extra_runs E
using (match_id, over_id, ball_id, innings_no)
WHERE match_id = 981018
and innings_no = 2
and E.Extra_Type_Id IN (2, 4)
GROUP BY D.innings_no, D.bowler, E.extra_type_id) as an extra
group by innings_no, bowler's order by bowler;

Join the request:

select Batsman.innings_no,
Batsman.bowler,
sum (balls) as B,
ifnull (sum (Runs_In_Over), 0) as R,
ifnull (sum (Zero), 0) is equal to 0,
ifnull (sum (Oven), 0) at 4s,
ifnull (sum (Six), 0) equal to 6s,
ifnull (sum (Wides), 0) as WD,
ifnull (sum (NoBalls), 0) as NB,
ifnull (sum (Extra_runs), 0) as Extra
from (SELECT A.innings_no,
A. Bowler,
to count (*) in balls,
Sum (B.Runs_Scored) As 'Runs_In_Over',
B.runs_scored box
when 0 then counts (*) ends like zero,
B.runs_scored box
when 4 then counts (*) ends with four,
B.runs_scored box
when 6, then (*) ends with Six
FROM `database`.ball_by_ball A
INNER JOIN `database`.batsman_scored B
using (match_id, over_id, ball_id, innings_no)
where match_id = 981018
and innings_no = 2
GROUP BY A.innings_no, A.bowler, B.runs_scored) as Batsman
LEFT JOIN (SELECT D.innings_no,
D. Bowler,
case E.extra_type_id
when 2 then counts (*) end up as Wides,
case E.extra_type_id
when 4, then (*) ends with NoBalls,
Sum (E.Extra_Runs) As' Extra_runs & # 39;
FROM `database`.ball_by_ball D
INNER JOIN `database & # 39; .extra_runs E
using (match_id, over_id, ball_id, innings_no)
WHERE match_id = 981018
and innings_no = 2
and E.Extra_Type_Id IN (2, 4)
GROUP BY D.innings_no, D.bowler, E.extra_type_id) as Extra with (innings_no, bowler)
group by innings_no, bowler's order by bowler;

Query 1 output:

enter the description of the image here

Query 2 output:

enter the description of the image here

Join the output of the query:

enter the description of the image here

If you have seen Query 1 and 2 screenshot and compare with the join query for BowlerThen, it is clear that when I use the left join as a subquery, the result does not show exactly what it shows in a single query.

So what's the problem.? What should I do to solve this problem and why does this problem occur?

Why are positions left open for so long?

The Business Advice Forum would be much more useful if he remained aware of the issues. Instead of handling messages that are several years old and allow people to continue posting them, they should be closed and maybe even archived. There are many unwanted publications that look fresh because every time a new publication is added, they top the list. Many, many are useless publications.

Business Advice Forum please clean your act. Do you agree?

Richard Miller
Apex Pressure

ease of use – Do the field labels on the top or on the left work better at the end of the form?

I designed these two forms and would like to know which one would be the most efficient for the conversion, that is to say the filling of the form.

Here is the first one which, in my opinion, constitutes a more effective reason being that separate rectangular containers interrupt the movement of the eye. When the eye focuses on the next item, it reads from left to right, which would help users fill out a step-by-step form. .

enter the description of the image here

Here is another form that has been made. The form fields differ but that is what is used by Android.
enter the description of the image here

Which one would work better?
Type of user: 20-30 years, average income, in constant contact with farmers, has a means of transport provided by the company, mainly uses the phone for calls and texting. The smart phone can be in the price range of $ 100 to $ 150. Samsung brand, OPPO, Motorola.

My consensus is that the user would read the text of the first image and see the text in gray noticing that it must be completed and filled. This goes against the top-down approach of how mobile users read forms. But it really helps the user to focus on the field he fills, which, in my opinion, is worth it.

The deletion of the Azure directory failed. I should delete App-Registrations, but there's more left

I found this article

but using the PS is not possible:
I can not connect this way to azure with my user (the connection with .de-domain does not work) – Thanks, MS!
Now I have no idea how to delete the directory.

Can you help me please?

Greetings,
Ulrich

Write $ n not equiv0 pmod $ 8 as $ w ^ 2 + left ( frac {x (1 + 1)} 2 right) ^ 2 + left ( frac {y (3y + 1)} 2 right) ^ 2 + left ( frac {z (5z + 1)} 2 right) ^ 2 $

The four squares theorem of Lagrange states that $ n in mathbb N = {0,1,2, ldots } $ is the sum of four whole squares. This beautiful result is actually very weak, for example, it is a consequence of Gauss-Legendre's theorem on the sums of three squares. As
$$ 4 (w ^ 2 + x ^ 2 + y ^ 2 + z ^ 2) = (2w) ^ 2 + (2x) ^ 2 + (2y) ^ 2 + (2z) ^ 2, $$
The four squares theorem of Lagrange is equivalent to that of any positive integer not divisible by $ 4 $ can be written as the sum of four squares.

I propose here a new refinement of the Lagrange theorem with four squares.

QUESTION. Is my next conjecture true?

Large guess 1-3-5. All positive integer $ n not equiv0 pmod8 $ can be written as
$$ w ^ 2 + left ( frac {x (x + 1)} 2 right) ^ 2 + left ( frac {y (3y + 1)} 2 right) ^ 2 + left ( fracture {z (5z + 1)} 2 right) ^ 2, $$
or $ w $ is a positive integer and $ x, y, z $ are integers.

I've checked this for $ n $ Up & # 39; to $ 2 times10 ^ $ 7. For example, $ 28 has a unique representation required:
$$ 28 = 3 ^ 2 + left ( frac {2 (2 + 1)} 2 right) ^ 2 + left ( frac {(- 1) (3 times (-1) +1)} 2 right) ^ 2 + left ( frac {1 (5 times1 + 1)} 2 right) ^ 2. $$
See also http://oeis.org/A306614 for related data and similar conjectures.

Note that the big 1-3-5 conjecture is different from my 1-3-5 conjecture published in this article, which states that $ n in mathbb N $ can be written as $ x ^ 2 + y ^ 2 + z ^ 2 + w ^ 2 $ with $ x, y, z, w in mathbb N $ such as $ x + 3y + 5z $ is a square. It should not be confused with my small conjecture 1-3-5 (see http://oeis.org/A287616) that any $ n in mathbb N $ can be written as $ x (x + 1) / 2 + y (3y + 1) / 2 + z (5z + 1) / 2 $ with $ x, y, z in mathbb N $.

The Big 1-3-5 conjecture is much stronger than Lagrange's four-square theorem. Your comments or other verifications are welcome!

sharepoint online – PowerApps Correction Function An optional people selection field generates an error when left blank

The optional people selector field generates an error each time it is left blank. This error does not occur when a name is selected.

"The requested operation is an invalid server response: the specified user i: 0 # .f | membership | was not found.".

Below, here is the syntax that I used:

BDE:
{
@ Odata.type: "# Microsoft.Azure.Connectors.SharePoint.SPListExpandedUser",
Claims: Concatenate ("i: 0 # .f | membership |", BDENF.Selected.Email),
Department:"",
Display name: BDENF.Selected.DisplayName,
Email: BDENF.Selected.Email,
Profession:"",
Picture:""
}

The left side of the screen lubuntu16.04 is covered by many bars of state.

SITUATION

I've tried restarting the system and restarting Xorg, but they are all in vain. How can I solve this?