I will remove unwanted object, person from 35 photos for $5

I will remove unwanted object, person from 35 photos

Welcome to my Gig

i will add or remove unwanted object, person from photo

Remove Person or Object: Removing an Object or a person from your Photo

Add Person or Object: Adding an Object or a person to your Photo

My Gig Services:

Remove unwanted person

Remove unwanted Object

Erase unwanted sticker, erase caption

Remove unwanted object, person, sticker from photoerase human-made objects like stop lights, street signsYou will get Unlimited Revisions with This Gig
If You Have Any Questions, Feel Free To Send Me a Message


When you make a Bitcoin transaction, can the receiving person (and the world?) really see how much coins you have in the entire wallet?

I really hope that I’ve got this horribly wrong, but I have to ask…

I have this idea, which I base on comments and explanations I’ve heard over the years, that when you make a Bitcoin transaction, for example 0.001 BTC, your wallet (let’s assume Bitcoin Core) actually sends your entire funds of your wallet, let’s say 1.5 BTC, but also includes a “gimme back” signal for 1.5 minus 0.001 BTC, ie 1,499 BTC, in the same “atomic action”, meaning you never actually risk losing all that money, but it is advertised to the person receiving it, and maybe the entire world.

I don’t understand why it would do this, and it seems extremely bad for privacy, and I’m not at all sure that it’s done. Maybe it only happens sometimes? If so, when? Or maybe it doesn’t mean “the full funds of the wallet”, but something else?

I hope that somebody can clear this up once and for all. It’s pretty telling that somebody who knew about Bitcoin in 2009 is actually asking this question in 2021, after using it for highly sensitive tasks for over a decade… I’m not wild about random people knowing how many Bitcoins I have simply by sending them money, and hope that this is not how it works.

112233 the very core of a person

The human [URL="https://ww… | Read the rest of https://www.webhostingtalk.com/showthread.php?t=1844586&goto=newpost

dnd 5e – When an NPC is under the effect of Dominate Person, can they cast spells under orders?

Yes, you can order a dominated NPC to cast spells

With a few caveats:
Let’s look at some of the details in the spell Dominate Person

You can use this telepathic link to issue commands to the creature while you are conscious (no action required), which it does its best to obey.

You can specify a simple and general course of action, such as “Attack that creature,” “Run over there,” or “Fetch that object.”

You can use your action to take total and precise control of the target. Until the end of your next turn, the creature takes only the actions you choose, and doesn’t do anything that you don’t allow it to do.

During this time you can also cause the creature to use a reaction, but this requires you to use your own reaction as well. (SRD, p. 138, same as PHB)

Any spell that can be cast “to attack” or otherwise “do something” is eligible for you to require of the dominated NPC as long as they have it prepared/known and have the spell slot.

Note that you can also take control of the NPC with your action and exercise that with a bit more precision, with the risk that anything that it would do naturally isn’t done such as move out of the way of a rolling boulder – unless you tell it to do so. In this usage, you’d need to tell the NPC “move away from the rolling boulder” or said NPC would just stand there.

And, if it knows counterspell, or has it prepared, you can use your reaction and make the NPC use its reaction to cast counterspell (if the situation calls for it).

Getting that NPC to cast ‘dominate person’ on another NPC gets into some recursive shenanigans, but if you took that “total and precise control” that looks to be a way to ‘chain’ dominate person (providing the spell saves are missed).

end to end encryption – E2EE verification without meeting in person (in Signal)

I’m playing around with e2ee a little. Would it be possible to verify the security numbers in the signal protocol by using already verified e2ee channels within the app securely?

Let E be a commutative cipher and for a message m donate m_ab as m is encrypted with E in a way that only a and b can decrypt it.
Let a: m -> b denote, that a sends message m to b.

I have four parties A,B,C and S, where S represents the application server.

I have verified E2EE encryption for A&B and for B&C, i want to create it for A&C.

Would the following be secure enough to be used in an application (like Signal)?

  1. A&C do a Handshake, but someone could be in the middle (mainly the Server S)

  2. A encrypts (a digest of the) sn for C using an authenticated encryption algorithm and the derived key from 1, calling this hsnA

  3. A sends hsnA to C via B, this is done as follows:

3.1 A: hsnA_ab -> S

3.2 S: hsnA_ab_ss -> B

3.3 B: hsnA_ss_bc -> S

3.4 S: hsnA_bc -> C

3.5 C decrypts it with the keys he has and compares it to his own digest. If the secrets of A and C match then C can also see that the authTag is valid.

  1. C sends a digest of the sn to A in a similar way.

For me this looks like it is sound and correct:

Correctness: If both of them have the same secret this should be secure anyway as hsnA and hsnC are encrypted and only the two of them know how to decrypt it. Neither B nor S can see the message unencrypted at any point in this case.


  1. This obviously allows the server to perform a known-plaintext-attack, but this shouldn’t be an issue for modern ciphers if I recall correctly.

  2. To me it seems like neither B nor S can change the message that is being sent. They could do so if S=B were the man in the middle, but the clients could choose who they trust to be in the middle on each verification

Is there anything I miss? Why is something like this not already implemented for an easier verification process?

covid 19 – Is a person with an EU work permit considered a citizen of European Union Member States?

A person with a work permit is not a citizen (to make it simple, a citizen is someone who can get a passport from that country). A person with a work permit way be a resident of that country, though.

But the site you linked has a long list which goes well beyond just citizens, and includes:

people who have the right of permanent or temporary residence in the Republic of Poland or a work permit,


foreigners with a permanent residence permit or a long-term resident’s European Union residence permit, in the territory of other European Union Member States, a Member State of the European Free Trade Agreement (EFTA) – parties to the agreement on the European Economic Area or the Swiss Confederation and their spouses and children, when traveling through the territory of the Republic of Poland, to their place of residence or stay.

If you are travelling to Poland, the first item is the one for you. If you are travelling through Poland, it’s the second one.

Erase history change history lose information replace information algorithm as a person

We cannot change the history of a person because we cannot travel back in time. Suppose that the person were a computer algorithm. Suppose there were a computer matrix, like a noncommutative math matrix. Is the Cloud like that? Could we completely delete and erase something in the algorithm, and by doing so erase its history, and then replace it with an alternative history? Can information be permanently lost? Can lost information be replaced by new information put in its place?

sql server – How is data of multi valued attribute say phone number of person relation is stored in table?

Your privacy

By clicking “Accept all cookies”, you agree Stack Exchange can store cookies on your device and disclose information in accordance with our Cookie Policy.

What happens to one’s invite, when that person leaves the organization

My question is:-
I have to send calendar invites for the whole year from my outlook calendar, but I am leaving this organization in one month.
So would the attendees still be able to see what I have sent as calendar invite after I leave the company??

First person camera turning 3D

I know how to make the effect of moving an object on the z axis, and strafing, but how do you make the effect of the view turning, I don’t use any 3d libraries or engine