Does the reduction of the nasal wings have an effect? The reason you should do nose reduction surgery – Everything Else

1. Does the reduction of the nasal wings have an effect?

The thick and irregular balance of the nose does not only make the nose less beautiful and the face is also much less sharp because it is not in harmony with the face in general.

48356219_1226175464187401_3563531251639910400_n

Nasopharyngeal reduction surgery will be the most optimal solution to help minimize the defects of the nose area.

So, does the reduction of the wings of the nose have an effect? According to the world's leading specialists in plastic surgery, nose reduction can be considered a surgical method, but it is classified as a minor surgical procedure simply because it concerns only the skin and soft tissues of the patient. nose.

20264698_1272705162851361_43386176131574820_n

2. The reason you should have surgery to reduce the wings of the nose

5 reasons you should collapse at VietCharm:

  • Achieved quickly, the accuracy rate of 100% helps customers get thin nails, in harmony with the face.

  • Natural nose wings, leaving no scars, showing no trace of aesthetics.

  • Good doctors, the standard implementation process guarantees beautiful and safe aesthetic results.

  • Lifetime warranty, even if the fault belongs to the customer.

  • Reasonable costs, with no additional costs during the implementation process, often apply promotions ranging from 10 to 50% to the customer's appreciation.

Specifically, after surgery to reduce the wings of the nose, you should take the following notes:

  • Apply ice to the area around the nose that has just been operated to reduce the swelling.

  • Take anti-inflammatories and painkillers as prescribed by your doctor.

  • Clean the nasal area with diluted salt water, limit exposure to dusty environments and avoid sunlight.

  • Abstain from foods that cause keloids such as spinach, chicken eggs, chicken, beef, seafood, glutinous rice dishes, etc. Limit your consumption of alcohol and stimulating drinks .

Please contact the hotline: 0941.939.393 – 0911.688.666 or 305 Kim Ma – Ba Dinh – Hanoi for doctors to examine the nose and consult directly. I wish you always beautiful and healthy!

See as well:

Savage Worlds Adventure Edition – Involvement of permanent injuries (including the reduction of an attribute by a type of die) on the edges and the use of weapons?

FYI: I'm using the Adventure Edition of Savage Worlds (SWADE).

If a Savage Worlds character suffers an injury that permanently reduces the die type for an attribute, does this mean that all edges that are dependent on this attribute are no longer valid? If so, what does it mean for the character? Do they have the opportunity to replace the edges with something else or lose it forever?

for example. A character has a d8 in Agility and buys the extraction edge during the bus. creation, which precedes the agility of d8 +. During the fight, they are unable, fail the Vigor roll and cast the "Broken" on the injury table (agility reduces the type of die).
What happens to their edge of extraction?

Does the same rule apply for what kind of weapon they can use? Let's say that they usually use a weapon that has a min. the strength of the d8, but the strength of the character is now a d6 – can they no longer use this weapon? Does this happen when the attribute is temporarily also reduced (as in, they have a temporary injury instead of a permanent injury)?
The answer to this question may seem obvious, but the reason I ask this question is because the character in question has the edge of the brand 's weapon and the weapon has a min. str. from d8. If they can no longer use this weapon, does this Edge become useless?

Savage Worlds (SWADE) – Involvement of permanent injuries (including the reduction of an attribute by a type of die) on the edges and the use of weapons?

FYI: I'm using the Adventure Edition of Savage Worlds (SWADE).

If a Savage Worlds character suffers an injury that permanently reduces the die type for an attribute, does this mean that all edges that are dependent on this attribute are no longer valid? If so, what does it mean for the character? Do they have the opportunity to replace the edges with something else or lose it forever?

for example. A character has a d8 in Agility and buys the extraction edge during the bus. creation, which precedes the agility of d8 +. During the fight, they are unable, fail the Vigor roll and cast the "Broken" on the injury table (agility reduces the type of die).
What happens to their edge of extraction?

Does the same rule apply for what kind of weapon they can use? Let's say that they usually use a weapon that has a min. the strength of the d8, but the strength of the character is now a d6 – can they no longer use this weapon? Does this happen when the attribute is temporarily also reduced (as in, they have a temporary injury instead of a permanent injury)?
The answer to this question may seem obvious, but the reason I ask this question is because the character in question has the edge of the brand 's weapon and the weapon has a min. str. from d8. If they can no longer use this weapon, does this Edge become useless?

Aggressive geometry – Reduction of the stacking condition (descent condition) on a fpqc site in the case of simple coatings

This is the lemma 4.25 of the Vistoli note

Let $ S $ to be a ploy, $ mathscr {F} to mathscr {S} ch / S $ a fiber category.
then $ mathscr {F} $ is a pile on the site fpqc on $ S $ Yes Yes
(1) $ mathscr {F} $ is a pile on the site Zariski on $ S $, and
(2) For each morphism fpqc $ V to U $ more than $ S $with $ U, V $ refined, $ mathscr {F} (U) to mathscr {F} (V to U) $ is equivalent.

I am in trouble in the last row at Step 5.

For the notation, see the pdf.

Let $ f: V to U $ to be a morphism fpqc on $ S $, and $ ( eta, phi) in mathscr {F} (V to U) $.
Then, by the descent of Zariski and step 4, we have $ xi in mathscr {F} (U) $ and an isomorphism $ beta: f ^ * xi cong eta $ in $ mathscr {F} (V) $.
Is this morphism really a morphism of data of descent?
that is to say this diagram
$ require {AMScd} $
begin {CD}
p_2 ^ * f ^ * xi @> {p_2 ^ * beta} >> p_2 ^ * eta \
@V {=} VV @V { phi} VV \
p_1 ^ * f ^ * xi @> {p_1 ^ * beta} >> p_1 ^ * eta
end {CD}

commutative?
(or $ p_i: V times_U V to V $ is the $ i $-the projection.

By building $ beta $, this diagram switches to $ V_i times_ {U_i} V_i = V_i times_U V_i $.
To show this on the whole $ V times_U V $, by descent Zariski, it is necessary to show the commutativity on $ V_i times_U V_j $ for separate $ i, j $.
But I can not.

As in step 4, if $ mathscr {F} (U_i cup U_j) to mathscr {F} (V_i cup V_j to U_i cup U_j) $ is equivalence, so I think the diagram is commutative.
So I reduce this to the quasi-compact case $ U $.

In the pile project, the author omitted this important part.
And in Olsson's "Algebraic Spaces and Stacks", the author uses (essentially) the same argument, but does not mention this commutativity.
And in Lei Fu's "theory of étom cohomology", the author leaves as many parts (the whole of Lemma 4.25 of Vistoli's note) in the form of an exercise …

Any help would be appreciated!

shrink – The ETL process causes a rapid growth of the database – Shrinkfile reduces the size from 140 GB to 2 GB – Keep the reduction?

Should I run the truncate command or delete the command? I'm trying to use
truncated but I had problems getting a lock on the tables so
I switched to deletion • Is it better to completely delete the table?
and recreate the object each time? Would that help with the
growth of the database? • I've read where "shrink" is not a good thing,
but sometimes it is necessary. Will set up a shrinkfile command
to run every week during off hours solve my problem?

The deletion probably increases the size of the log file of your database because it is a journaled operation.

The truncated table is an operation with only metadata and must be instantaneous, even for large tables (as long as it is not blocked).

MS Docs on TRUNCATE TABLE

Removes all rows from a table or specified partitions from a table,
without saving the deletions of individual lines. TRUNCATE TABLE is
similar to the DELETE statement without a WHERE clause; however,
TRUNCATE TABLE is faster and uses less system log and transactions
Resources.

And

When the DELETE statement is run with the help of a line lock, each line of
the table is locked for deletion. TRUNCATE TABLE always locks
table (including schema lock (SCH-M)) and page, but not each line.

When running the truncated table, the table will be locked. This includes a SCH-M lock. Nevertheless, you should use truncate if you delete all the data from the table.

Why and what locks the table when running the truncated command?

Amazon Web Services – AWS EBS EC2 LVM AWS Partitioning Volume Reduction

Problem

I have a physical machine with a 1 TB drive and it was copied via a command line not a word, the disc was imported into S3 and successfully converted to AMI. But now I have a problem of cost and I have to reduce this machine to 30 GB. I am looking for a solution on the Internet but not all found tutorials cite cases with LVM partitions.

What I've tried

https://n2ws.com/blog/how-to-guides/how-to-reduce-the-size-of-an-ee-volume

https://medium.com/@andtrott/how-to-downsize-a-root-ebs-volume-on-aws-ec2-amazon-linux-727c00148f61

https://medium.com/@rahulian/how-to-reduce-volume-of-an-aws-ec2-instance-d493ec891698

How to reduce the size of the AWS EBS root volume?

Useful information

SO: CENTOS 5.9

[root @] # fdisk -l

Disk / dev / hda: 1000.7 GB, 1000727379968 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors / track, 121664 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes

Boot Start End Blocks Id System Device
/ dev / hda1 * 1 13 104391 83 Linux
/ dev / hda2 14 121601 976655610 8e Linux LVM

[root @] # df -h
System File Us Usa Disp Usage% Mounted on
/ dev / mapper / VolGroup00-LogVol00
                      897G 4.4G 847G 1% /
/ dev / hda1 99M 17M 78M 18% / boot
tmpfs 501M 0 501M 0% / dev / shm

MightWeb – Pure SSD RAID10 | cPanel – Linux | 20% reduction over the lifetime | Basic management

Special Promotion for WebHostingTalk

Use the coupon code FEEL THE POWER when ordering, receive a 20% lifetime discount (for monthly billing terms) on all VPS packages.

Our virtual private servers are sold at our Chicago location in Illinois.
You will find below our user reviews!
Accept PayPal, credit cards and BitCoin.

Our mirror:
http://lg.chi.relandergroup.com

main Features

  • Pure SSD RAID 10 Storage
  • RioRey DDoS Mitigation
  • Gigabit uplinks with a 10 Gbps connection
  • Virtualizor
  • Managed Linux servers
  • Company quality material
  • 24/7 technical support
  • Free automated installations
  • KVM Virtualization

Linux – Virtual Private Servers

————————————————– ————————————————– ————————

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4
CPU 1 core 2 cores 3 cores 4 cores
RAM 2048 MB 3072 MB 4096 MB 6144 MB
Pure SSD RAID 10 Disk space 30GB 50 GB 70 GB 100 GB
Uplink Gigabit uplink Gigabit uplink Gigabit uplink Gigabit uplink
Premium Bandwidth 1024 GB 2048 GB 3072 GB 4096 GB
IP addresses 1 1 1 1
Root access Full access to the root Full root access Full access to the root Full access to the root
cPanel Included Included Included Included
Basic management Included Included Included Included
Mitigation of DDoS attacks Included Included Included Included
Standard price – Price with discount $ 36.95 / month$ 29.56 / month $ 54.95 / month$ 43.96 / month $ 69.95 / month$ 55.96 / month $ 99.95 / month$ 79.96 / month
READ MORE READ MORE READ MORE READ MORE

Basic management

This means that we support initial setup and provide responsive support for any issues that may arise. We are also actively monitoring your server. Relax and focus on your project, and leave the rest to us!

Our SSDs

We only use Pure solid state hard drives in RAID 10 configurations for our VPS KVMs. The RAID 10 configuration provides higher speeds and a higher level of redundancy.

Mitigation of DDoS attacks

Our shields against layer 3/4 attacks are also effective against attacks that are much harder to detect.
You can learn more about our mitigation of DDoS attacks here: Mitigation of MightWeb DDoS attacks

Still not convinced? Here are some of our clients and why they think you should choose us!

Quote Originally posted by Jason Freeman

Best customer service I've ever seen! Not only is the service fast, but the support is too! These rock guys. Marcus and the team are top!
Link to RateLobby

Quote Originally posted by Ann Eliese G.

MightWeb support is fantastic, Greg was a great help today – he responded in minutes to confirmation of the resolution. Their response times are better than those of all the companies I've worked with in the past, and they go out of their way to help, even with little things.
Link to RateLobby

Quote Originally posted by Scott W.

I have not been with MightWeb for too long, but I must say that their service and support are stellar!
MightWeb has the best prices and the service continues to work. In fact, I feel bad sometimes to pay so little for all the exceptional support and service! Thank you!
Link to RateLobby

Quote Originally posted by Catherine C.

Super service and support. I am used to a delay of more than 6 hours between support communications from my old host and I was very pleasantly surprised at the almost immediate response to a ticket. A resolution of my strange problem was very fast.
Link to RateLobby

Quote Originally posted by Katy C.

You had a really weird problem when connecting to WHM and cPanel. It took hours and there was no obvious cause for connection failures. Like magic, everything arranged, but Marcus stayed with me and did not stop trying to debug / solve, even though it was almost certain that the problem was only concerned not the server. Excellent customer support from these guys.
Link to RateLobby

Quote Originally posted by Sachin

Excellent host with a great support team. I can recommend them for support alone (if not for an excellent price, fast performance or reliable service). I will recommend these guys everyday. Good job Marcus and Mike.
Link to RateLobby

Quote Originally posted by Ben Ringnalda

After reading some positive comments here and on the Webhostingtalk forum, I decided to move our website to Mightweb and I got the Enterprise package. I was looking for better customer service, better spam blocking and better performance, including higher resource utilization limits. I am really satisfied with the performance and service provided by Mightweb. Our website was not the easiest to migrate and required some changes that were quickly handled by technical support (thanks Marcus!), Even beyond what you normally expect from a company d & # 39; accommodation. Everything works very well, we see much faster performance and much less spam. The customer service is almost instantaneous, especially via chat, while tickets are quickly processed. Never had to wait more than 30 minutes. And all at an unbeatable price! Overall, an excellent hosting company. Recommend strongly!
Link to RateLobby

Quote Originally posted by Jordan G.

Marcus and Mike are great! It's one of the best supports I've ever received. Thanks guys!
Link to RateLobby

Quote Originally posted by Brian H.

MightWeb was exactly what I was looking for at a host. I've been using another (super big business) in recent years, but I did not feel like I was getting the performance or attention I wanted. MightWeb presents all the latest aspects of performance I was looking for: LiteSpeed ​​server, CloudLinux, MariaDB, and hosted on SSDs … all for an incredibly affordable price. The icing on the cake was the technical support. Marcus at MightWeb was extremely helpful and kind. He was ready to talk at any time and never seemed in a hurry. He ended up feeling more like a personal friend than a company. Excellent customer service. In the expectation of a long term relationship with MightWeb.
Link to RateLobby

Quote Originally posted by Jen D.

When I discovered the reliable service of MightWeb and affordable prices, I immediately switched to hosting provider! I bought and hosted domains from different sites, many of which seemed enjoyable but ended up having a terrible customer service! Unlike its competitors, MightWeb gives priority to customer satisfaction and offers its customers an easy-to-use service and friendly customer support! I highly recommend their services.
Link to RateLobby

Quote Originally posted by Vladimir Stafford

I am so happy to have found MightWeb on WHT. I was looking for a host who offers simple email hosting without the hassle of seeing big players and getting paid for each mailbox. Mightweb has incredible support and reliable servers. It's just a simple host that offers great services.
Link to RateLobby

Quote Originally posted by Cory S.

Quote Originally posted by Garrett A.

Quick and stable hosting, expertly managed, avoids problems and slowdowns. I have encountered very few problems while using MightWeb; However, when a problem arises, they are always resolved quickly by their dedicated staff.
Link to RateLobby

Quote Originally posted by Lee Li

I met MightWeb before a little over a month ago. At first I was talking with a representative to get information about the server. I had a great time and very good explanations, leaving me absolutely speechless. Usually, I do not even bother to evaluate the companies I use, but this business seems and feels different, like a good home, a perfect audience and a professional team. I wish the best of luck to this company, I think they deserve to grow because they really have something different! Therefore, I would recommend everyone and rate their services 5/5!
Link to RateLobby

Quote Originally posted by Andrea B.

I am really happy with MightWeb. I was looking for a host offering SSD + LiteSpeed ​​+ CloudLinux in the Chicago area and I discovered MightWeb on WHT. Excellent speeds, incredible support and reliable servers. I recommend this provider 100% 5/5. Marcus does a great job!
Link to RateLobby

Quote Originally posted by WebHostingTalk Reviews

Learn more about our services on https://mightweb.net | All reviews on RateLobby
You can also call us, chat with us or open a ticket – if you have any questions!

Frequently asked questions

Q: Are you a reseller?

A: No, we are not a reseller. We own and operate our own infrastructure.

Q: What virtualization?

A: We use KVM virtualization for all our virtual private servers.

Q: Which means of payment do you accept?

A: We accept PayPal, credit cards and BitCoin.

Q: Can I, as a customer outside of the United States / Canada, order from your home?

A: Absolutely! Do not forget that due to VAT, prices may differ if you order from the EU.

Q: Are there any hidden fees?

A: There are no hidden fees at all. All prices are shown as is on the website and upon payment. Our prices on the website display the monthly default conditions. As a result, prices are often lower when selecting annual payments.

Q: Do you offer additional IP addresses?

A: We offer additional IP addresses at an additional cost of $ 2 / IP / month.

Q: Do you offer personalized packages?

A: We could maybe! Go ahead and contact our sales team with your requirements, and we'll see what we can solve.

5th dnd – Would it be balanced to allow the enlargement / reduction to double its effect during overheating?

the enlarge reduce The spell currently has no benefits listed to be upcast. It also seems relatively rare to find 5th mechanics capable of stacking with this spell, which allows you to magnify / reduce even more of a size category, but they do exist. I would like to allow slightly easier access to this possibility.

How would the balance of the game be affected if we added the following sentence at the bottom of the enlarge reduce description of the spell:

At the higher levels: When it is cast with a spell location of level 7 or higher, the target grows or decreases by two size categories instead of one, multiplying / dividing their size in all dimensions by 4 instead of 2, and multiplying / dividing their weight by 64 instead of eight. . The increase or reduction of damage becomes 2d4 instead of 1d4.

I chose the 7th level because it is greater than 2, and I read that level 6 to 9 spells can be considered a separate level of play for level 1 to 5 spells. in the broad sense, moving a level 2 spell from the lower level to the higher rank should result in a level 7 spell slot.

I hope the cost here, a level 7 hex location, far outweighs the gain of having two larger size categories. The huge increase in weight seems to me the most worrying element of this description.

Number Theory – Reduction to the Lie Algebra Version of the Fundamental Lemma?

Ngo famously proved that the Langlands-Shelstad fundamental lemma for Lie algebras used the geometry of Hitchin's fibration.

For the purposes of the trace formula, it is actually the fundamental lemma of the group. In his ICM notes, Ngo indicates that Waldspurger shows how to reduce the group declaration to the Lie algebra declaration, but the reference is unclear (at least for me).

My question is

Where is this reduction discussed? A precise reference would be great.

Instead of the reference, I would also gladly accept a sketch of the reduction:

How does this reduction work?

algorithms – As transitive reduction, but by removing vertices rather than edges?

Suppose I have a directed graph $ G = (V, E) $ (or, what is the same thing, a relationship on the whole $ V $ as defined by the adjacency matrix) which can contain three vertices $ x, y, z $, such as $ xy, xz, yz in E $ – that is, the restricted relationship to $ x, y, z $ is transitive, there is a triangle. Let's call this situation a "local transitivity". My goal is to get all the subgraphs of $ G $ induced by cutting the vertices of the middle of local transitivities until disappearing, what I call "resolution".

There can be several solutions. For example, consider a graph given by this relation:

  a b c d  
a □ ■ ■ □  
b □ □ ■ ■  
c □ □ □ ■  
d □ □ □ □  

(It looks like a square with a diagonal.)

It can be solved in two ways:

  a b d        a c d  
a □ ■ □      a □ ■ □  
b □ □ ■      c □ □ ■  
d □ □ □      d □ □ □  

One way to calculate the resolutions of a graph is to give "non-deterministic" a function $ f: G rightarrow {G } $ which suppresses any single local transitivity. Apply repeatedly $ f $ for any graphic, I will finally converge on a set of induced subgraphs completely devoid of local transitivities.

One way to define $ f $ is considering all the triplets of distinct vertices and checking them for local transitivity. From each corresponding triple, the middle vertex is extracted and any one of these vertices is cut off. But there is about $ | V | ^ 3 $ these triples.

Is there a better way? Is there any prior art that I can study?