Positive – Sharktech Review | NewProxyLists

Many here at NewProxyLists knew about That1Design; for myself and for my clients, I am very special with whom I host.

About three years ago, I created a private online community. Unfortunately, those who learned about it started sending DDoS attacks. My host at that time ended up routing our IP and the community was not available.

After speaking with several DDoS protection providers, I decided to migrate to Sharktech. Here's Sharktech:

Sharktech Internet Services, established in 2003, is a provider of DDoS protection for high traffic websites. In addition, businesses are offered a full set of high-transfer server hosting and managed services at affordable prices. After a decade of commercial growth and concentrated development, Sharktech now offers services in three geo-diversified data centers.
The

I have been working at Sharktech for about two years now. In short, a Sharktech review, let me tell you that Sharktech is awesome! The configuration of my VPS Cloud is as follows: 4 virtual processors, 4 GB of memory, 80 GB of SSD, 140 GB of hard drive and 100 Mbps without measurement. Their support is always quick and Tim and Erin are always helpful.

thank you,
Dominica

Vinax 10-year review | Web Talk Hosting

After 10 years as a Vinax customer (www.vinax.net) and by renting a number of dedicated servers with them, my company has unfortunately recently left. Due to various factors within my industry, my business is taking all of its operations in-house. Our experience with Vinax has been extremely positive.

Support

Tommy and his support team are exceptional. They are all well trained and knowledgeable. Response times were always a few minutes, no matter how trivial the ticket was. Delays in resolving support requests were also quick.

oversight

Their free proactive monitoring adds considerable value. They often detected and fixed all inaccessible servers before we even had time to fix the problem.

Network

They are hosted in the Steadfast data center in Chicago, which was very reliable and worked well for us.

Equipment

All of their servers are SuperMicro and were therefore very reliable. However, material problems are inevitable, especially given the length of our stay with Vinax. Often, with other vendors, it took several hours to diagnose hardware problems to determine which specific component was causing the problem. The supplier would then replace only this problematic part. With Vinax, most of the time a hardware problem occurred, the whole diagnostic period was bypassed because they would only move our hard drive to a new server chassis. This saved us hours of headaches and downtime.

I am very grateful for the quality and constant service provided by Vinax.

Sale – Outdoor Niche Product Review Website | NewProxyLists

Hi,
I want to sell my outdoor niche website.

The site: https://www.OutdoorsRecreation.net

Info:
OutdoorsRecreation is an outdoor niche review product website.
We review the products that can be used for outdoor slots.
All 10 articles are UNIQUE and written by a professional writer and include a review of each Amazon product.
The recreation has nearly 11,000 words (10,300).
The website created with WordPress CMS, so it's easy to maintain, edit and add content.gt

Optimization:
The website is optimized and loaded in less than a second,
* Value of $ 250

circulation:
The website does not have a lot of traffic.

For the buyer:
I push the domain for free via Name.com.
I will send him all the content of the site.

Price – $ 199 OBO.

Payment – Pay Pal

Cordially.

Pet Niche Product Review Website

Hi,
I want to sell my pet niche product review website.

The site: https://www.PetLoversArena.com
Info:
PetLoversArena is a review product website on the pet niche.
All 34 articles are UNIQUE and written by a professional writer and include a review of each Amazon product.
PetLoversArena has more than 12,000 words.
The website created with WordPress CMS makes it easy to maintain, edit and add content.

circulation:
The website does not have a lot of traffic.

For the buyer:
I push the domain for free via NameCheap.com.
I will send him all the content of the site.
SEMrush

Price – $ 399 OBO.

Payment – Pay Pal

Cordially.

Sale – Baseball Bat Review Website

Hi,
I want to sell my baseball bats review website.

The site: https://www.BatsGuide.com

Info:
BatsGuide is a website for reviewing baseball bat products.
All 5 articles are UNIQUE and written by a professional writer and include a review of each Amazon product.
BatsGuide has nearly 20,000 words (19,400).
The home page has more than 5700 words.
The website created with WordPress CMS makes it easy to maintain, edit and add content.

circulation:
The website does not have a lot of traffic.

For the buyer:
I push the domain for free via NameCheap.com.
Expires time – 19 / Sep / 2020.
I will send him all the content of the site.

Price – $ 149 OBO.

Payment – Pay Pal

Cordially.
SEMrush

Nexus app – Pending review

I requested the Nexus card in July 2019 and the status of the request is still pending review. Is it typical to take so long? I have been waiting for almost more than 5.5 months.

I will do a Profession online course exam for $ 10

I will do a online course review Profession

Have you spent a lot of effort creating an online course and now want an honest review by a professional?

If this is the case, then this concert is definitely for you!

I myself am an online instructor, so I know how important it is to get these first honest good reviews from an online course to help with promotion and sales!

I would be honored to help a fellow instructor by giving a good honest review and a good rating!

I am also a professional 5 star book author, blogger and YouTuber.

If desired, in addition to a written exam, I can also do a video review of your online course for a small fee.

You can use this video review as a course testimonial on your YouTube channel, website, or social media channel.

Just send me a free promo code for your online course platform and I will give a good honest review as soon as possible.

.

write all your SEO articles in bulk up to 20,000 words across all niches for $ 400

write all your SEO articles in bulk up to 20,000 words across all niches

An experienced writer at your service committed to providing you with quality content. My determination to consistently provide quality work has allowed me to maintain a high rating on this concert, and I hope to continue to achieve excellent results.

I will write a 20,000 word blog or article. I can write competently on various topics, ranging from sports, technology, health and fitness, entertainment, lifestyle, real estate, parenting, world news, etc.

.

python – FQDN Validation – Code Review Stack Exchange

I am new to programming, I would like you to check out my work and criticize me. What would you do differently?

import re


def is_fqdn(hostname):
    """
    :param hostname: string
    :return: bool
    """
    #  Remove trailing dot
    try:  # Is this necessary?
        if hostname(-1) == '.':
            hostname = hostname(0:-1)
    except IndexError:
        return False

    #  Check total length of hostname < 253
    if len(hostname) > 253:
        return False

    #  Split hostname into list of DNS labels
    hostname = hostname.split('.')

    #  Define pattern of DNS label
    #  Can begin and end with a number or letter only
    #  Can contain hyphens, a-z, A-Z, 0-9
    #  1 - 63 chars allowed
    fqdn = re.compile(r'^(a-z0-9)((a-z-0-9-){0,61}(a-z0-9))?$', re.IGNORECASE)

    #  Check if length of each DNS label < 63
    #  Match DNS label to pattern
    for label in hostname:
        if len(label) > 63:
            return False
        if not fqdn.match(label):
            return False

    #  Found no errors, returning True
    return True

1: Is this test block really necessary in this case?

2: I declared the variable for the regular expression model after the 2 conditions with return statements. My thought was, why store a variable that would not be used if the previous conditions were met?

3: Could the regex be better written?

Kotlin DSL validation library – Code Review Stack Exchange

In the process of creating a validation library for Kotlin and I would like to take full advantage of Kotlin's expressiveness by creating a powerful DSL. I'm off to a good start, but I'm looking for comments on the following:

  • DSL general design
  • Will this current approach easily adapt to future capabilities (some examples will be below)
  • All the cool things about Kotlin that I don't currently enjoy

The fundamental validation API uses the idea of FieldValidationRules which are applied to an instance field / property. A rule can be created for each field that must be validated. FieldValidationRules contains a list FieldConstraint instances that "constrain" the field to certain valid values. When the validator is called on a given instance, all the rules are applied to this instance.

I will only share the DSL code here, but if reviewers want the full project context, here is a link to the full project. Although I mainly seek comments on DSL, all comments on the project are welcome.

Configuration

@DslMarker
annotation class KalidDslMarker

@KalidDslMarker
class FieldValidationRuleConfiguration {
    private val _fieldConstraints: MutableList> = mutableListOf()

    val fieldConstraints: List>
        get() = _fieldConstraints

    fun notNull() {
        _fieldConstraints.add(NotNullFieldConstraint())
    }

    fun isNull() {
        _fieldConstraints.add(NullFieldConstraint())
    }

    fun between(min: Int, max: Int) {
        _fieldConstraints.add(RangeLengthFieldConstraint(min, max))
    }

    fun maximum(max: Int) {
        _fieldConstraints.add(MaximumLengthFieldConstraint(max))
    }

    fun minimum(min: Int) {
        _fieldConstraints.add(MinimumLengthFieldConstraint(min))
    }

    fun lengthOf(length: Int) {
        _fieldConstraints.add(ExactLengthFieldConstraint(length))
    }
}

@KalidDslMarker
class ValidatorConfiguration {
    private val _validationRules: MutableList> = mutableListOf()

    val validationRules: List>
        get() = _validationRules

    fun  rule(
        expression: (T) -> R,
        block: FieldValidationRuleConfiguration.() -> Unit
    ) {
        with(FieldValidationRuleProvider(block)) {
            val rule = createFieldRule(expression)
            _validationRules.add(rule)
        }
    }

    fun  ruleForAll(
        expression: (T) -> Iterable,
        block: FieldValidationRuleConfiguration.() -> Unit
    ) {
        with(FieldValidationRuleProvider(block)) {
            val rule = createCollectionFieldRule(expression)
            _validationRules.add(rule)
        }
    }
}

suppliers

class FieldValidationRuleProvider(init: FieldValidationRuleConfiguration.() -> Unit) {
    private val config: FieldValidationRuleConfiguration = FieldValidationRuleConfiguration().apply(init)

    fun createFieldRule(expression: (T) -> Any?): FieldValidationRule =
        FieldValidationRuleBase(config.fieldConstraints, expression)

    fun createCollectionFieldRule(expression: (T) -> Iterable): FieldValidationRule> =
        CollectionFieldValidationRule(config.fieldConstraints, expression)
}

class ValidatorProvider(init: ValidatorConfiguration.() -> Unit) {
    val config: ValidatorConfiguration = ValidatorConfiguration().apply(init)
}

inline fun  ValidatorProvider.createValidator(): Validator =
    BasicValidator(T::class, config.validationRules)

Syntax for creating the validator

inline fun  validator(noinline block: ValidatorConfiguration.() -> Unit): Validator =
    with(ValidatorProvider(block)) { createValidator() }

Use

Commented code are possible ideas to pursue in the future if this current architecture supports them.

val addressValidator = validator
{ rule({ it.zip }) { // Wanted behavior // lengthOf(5) granted (address.state == "Texas") otherwise lengthOf(6) } } val personValidator = validator { rule({ it.age }) { // Wanted behavior // when (person.address.state) { // "Texas" -> minimum(21) // "Louisiana" -> minimum(18) // } } rule({ it.address }) { // Wanted behavior // withValidator(addressValidator) } ruleForAll({ it.friendNames }) { notNull() maximum(2) } } fun main() { val person = ... val result = personValidator.validate(person) }