## dnd 5th – Does 5th follow the primary source rule?

In D & D 3.5, there is a hierarchy of sources as a concept of rules so that if something in a text contradicts a passage in another of the sources can officially prevail. An important advantage of this often muffled publishing paradigm is that the basic rules (PHB, MM and DMG) take precedence over any other source that contradicts them, with the exception of errata, and that, therefore, the possession of the rules Basic lets you know how these rule books work; you do not need more books to find out, for example. how to fall "actually" works, because the rules presented in the base game are modified only by freely available errata documents, at least in theory. Other books may have optional rules or rule systems, but they can not add new rules that change even slightly the way the old ones work. So you can be sure, if you have the basic game, that you are not. something is missing.

Of course, the assistants then made publish content (for example, the FAQ or Compendium of Rules) that was not an errata and yet tried to change the way things worked and that did not work as well. But I'm misleading.

In the 5th edition, I'm not sure what the conflict resolution structure is supposed to be, or even if there is one. I know that most systems use a rule that "the last thing printed is the right one", often without even coding it, and I suspect that 5th real Resolution system is that the official rules are not meant to be consistent and sorting is the work of the SM, but I'm not sure if there is a statement / rules printed on how it works somewhere .

Does 5th have publication primacy rules similar to primary source rules 3.5 and, if not, what is it?

## How to create a rule with javascript from scratch?

Honestly, if the training camp does not teach you how to do that, what is the point of being there? Hardcore or not, you do not say "go ahead" without prior training. Is it expected that you know this stuff first?

That said, what would you need to do a roulette wheel in real life? A spinning wheel, a ball and spaces on the wheel so that the ball can land when the wheel low (or whatever their effectiveness). So, in javascript, you would do animations for the spinning wheel. And you would have a ball to land (your return) and the numbers that are chosen and a method to choose those numbers.

So, what would you need to do animations, pick a number and send it back?

## lens – The Sunny f / 16 Rule

Sunny-16: to obtain optimal exposure when shooting in clear, sunny weather outside (distinct shadows), set the aperture to f / 16 and the speed of the camera. shutter on the reverse of ISO.

While reading on the sunny ruler-16, I found a chart (below) that indicates which shutter speed is needed to maintain the same exposure as f / 16 with 1/200 @ ISO 200 when opening is open point by point and the ISO is maintained at 200.

My question is: if I shoot under conditions of great overcast sky (very dark and sad, with no visible shade), the Great Overcast-5.6 rule would apply. Since I have to use a shutter speed of ~ 1/2000 sec to freeze the movement of the subject, should I use:

a) f / 5.6 with 1/2000 sec @ ISO 2000

b) f / 5.6 with 1/2000 sec @ ISO 200

c) f / 5.6 with 1/1600 sec @ ISO 200

(d) neither (a) nor (b) nor (c).

Answers appreciated. Please correct errors as I am not aware of this yet. I'm planning to buy my first digital SLR and my first lens soon, but I do not know which aperture is best for my needs.

## views – Drupal 8 – Rule: add a condition to the selection by drop-down list

I have a drop-down menu in a node and the id's drop-down menu is "field_b_status".
I want to add a condition to a rule if the value of the drop-down list is equal to one of the "Full" values, then send an e-mail

When I try to add this, I see the error.
Field_b_status.value data selector for the context The data to be compared is not valid. Can not get field_b_status variable, it is not set.

Can you help me how to add the dropdown list "field_b_status" in the condition?

## dnd 5th – What balance problems result from this internal rule that modifies Shield Master's exploit?

For a next match, I weigh Master Shield as a selection. The more I look closely (and recent decisions about it), however, the more I find it dull compared to other choices like Grandmaster of arms, Master of firearms, Elite shooter, and even Dual Wielder.

Third advantage of the master shield, the EvasionThe ability similar to avoiding damage when backing up successfully with DEX is tasty and useful. He embodies a classic narrative trope of use of the shield, and he is likely to save important HP that would otherwise be lost to breathe weapons, fireball and similar spells, etc.

The other two benefits of the exploit are more dubious.

The first advantage, which consists in granting a premium to the action in the event of an attack action, has been the subject of inversion of the rules limiting its application to after all attacks are over. I find this restriction unsatisfactory both mechanically and narratively. Mechanically, this means that a character using the bonus-action action will rarely benefit, as his target can simply move when his turn comes in, even before it has the opportunity to & # 39; Act again. And narratively, force a melee fighter to be "attacked" (or, for those who have Additional attack, potentially "Attack-Attack-Attack-Attack-Thrust") occurs in an arbitrary and unnatural way. Imagine a heroic adventure tale in which a character called "master" of the shield technique does not could never lead with his shield. Besides, why is it so difficult, even for a character with Shield Master, to effectively use a shield bash as a melee damage option? Overall, compared to the very effective and directly beneficial bonus action attacks by the Grand Master of Arms and the Master of Firearms, this part of Shield Master is disappointing.

The second advantage, which is to add the defensive bonus of the shield to the DEX backups compared to the single target effects, seems useful in theory, but is disappointing in its application and its scenario. It's not unrealistic to think that a character with Shield Master can survive an entire campaign without using this benefit. This is not an advantage at all.

Therefore, I consider a house rule modifying Shield Master by adding the following two bullets:

• You control shields as improvised weapons.

• When using a shield as an improvised weapon, you can use two – weapon combat even when the melee weapon with one hand that you wield in your other hand is not light.

This modification seeks to put Shield Master roughly at the same level as Polearm Master and Dual Wielder. A character with Dual Wielder may, for example, brandish two long swords with a d8 damage die, or a long d8 sword and a D4 whip with a range, and still gain a +1 to AC. A character who uses Firearms Master will not receive the bonus points of a shield and will only have one d4 damage dice for his casual attack (ie "to the opposite end "), but adds its ability modifier to the invisible damage. Polearm d10 damage dies for his main attacks and reaches all his attacks. In comparison, with this change, a Shield Master's character can benefit from the +2 bonus to AC from his shield and continue to use the two-weapon combat, although with an unmodified d4 dice from the shield . Or, thanks to the skill piece, she can easily drive with his shield, treating the shield as his main weapon and using his normal weapon for a bonus action attack with unmodified damage. She could even lead using the attack with her attacking action and continue to have a bonus attack by fighting two weapons – just as she could with Polearm Master or Dual Wielder.

Nevertheless, it is possible that I miss something. Are there any foreseeable problems of balance here? What are they?

## Functional Analysis – A String Rule in the Distribution Space \$ mathcal {D} & # 39; \$

Many calculation results are valid for distributions. In any case, I did not find anything on a string rule for derivatives of distributions (obviously, when they are of the function type, hence elements of $$L ^ 1_ {loc} subset mathcal {D}$$).

A non-technical but interesting result?

## server – udev does not load rule automatically after reboot

I have a rule that should apply to / dev / ipmi0 to change his band and his mode. When I restart, this node displays the root: root, but if I run "test", it will apply it successfully:

\$ cat /etc/udev/rules.d/99-ipmi-nonroot.rules
SUBSYSTEM == "ipmi", KERNEL == "ipmi0", GROUP = "adm", MODE = "0660"

\$ ls -l / dev / ipmi *
crw ------- 1 root root 244, 0 Jul 6 16:57 / dev / ipmi0

\$ sudo udevadm test / sys / class / ipmi / ipmi0
....
the rules contain 49152 byte (4096 * 12-byte) tokens of 14763 bytes
2054 strings (26612 bytes), 1334 deduplication (12570 bytes), 721 used nodes
GROUP 4 /etc/udev/rules.d/99-ipmi-nonroot.rules:1
MODE 0660 /etc/udev/rules.d/99-ipmi-nonroot.rules:1
processing device node & dev / cd / ipmi0, devnum = c244: 0, mode = 0660, uid = 0, gid = 4
preserve permissions / dev / ipmi0, 020660, uid = 0, gid = 4
retains the existing symbolic link & dev / char / 244: 0 & # 39; at & # 39; ../ ipmi0 & # 39;
DEVNAME = / dev / ipmi0
...

\$ ls -l / dev / ipmi *
crw-rw ---- 1 root adm 244, 0 Jul 6 17:00 / dev / ipmi0

I have also tried udev trigger as we see in this answer. This will also change the group into adm, but does not "stick" either after a reboot. Should I place my rule under / lib instead of / etc? It does not go well.

## search – The item was deleted because it was excluded by an analysis rule

My search analysis does not work for my local site.
On my analysis log, I see a warning:

Element not analyzed for one of the following reasons: Preventive analysis rule; Specified content source jumps / depth exceeded; The URL has a query string parameter; Required protocol manager not found; Preventive Robots Directive. ( This item was removed because it was excluded by a rule of analysis. )

Important information:

• I just moved all my content databases to a newly installed SharePoint on a new server.
• I am using SharePoint Standard Server 2019
• When I change the address of the content source to full FQDN, the search works partially with many 401 warnings.
• The address in question is https
• Same address with sps3 get crawled successfully without any problem
• There is no robots.txt file on the site

I tried and checked everything I could think of, including:

• I have verified that the default access account has access to the website.
• I have navigated to the website (using a browser) while logging in using the default login account
• I made sure that there is no rules of analysis
• I have created a new crawl rule to include the affected URL.
• I did "index reset"
• I have disabled loopbackCheck
• I've used Fiddler to monitor the traffic, the robot does not even have access to the site.

## Propagation of constraint with the help of the projection rule

I found this constraint propagation example with the help of a projection rule

We have

C = {x1 ≠ x2, x1 ≥ x2}

< C; x1 ∈ {1,2,3}, x2 ∈ {1,2,3} >

They say that the application of the propagation rule gives no simplification.

I'm not sure why that's the case. Should not we have?

< C; x1 ∈ {2,3}, x2 ∈ {1,2} >

The other steps in the example give me a sense, for example:

< C; x1 ∈ {2}, x2 ∈ {1,2,3} >

product

< C; x1 ∈ {2}, x2 ∈ {1} >

## views – drupal module rule 8

I just installed a module rule in my Drupal 8 and I want to send email notifications and a JSON stream when the content editor saves the editing node.

Can you please let me know how I can get there from the RULE module?

Or can you please let me know if there is another way to do it?