Can I have the primary node of the Always-on availability group different from the secondary?
RAM 64, cores 8
RAM 256, cores 32
Since I consider that the read-only requests are written 4 times, and that I will use the read routing to the secondary, I found a recommendation so that the two replicas always active are comparable, and i don't know if this is a recommendation, or if identical means thanks
Leaving aside security concerns, is there a reliable way to communicate data via the clipboard between users on a single device without using network methods? For example, just copy a link to the main space, then access it later via the clipboard in the secondary space. Application suggestions are welcome.
NB: There is already an option to import / export files, photos, etc. (but not sharing the clipboard)
I have list A and list B. I use SharePoint Online and Power Automate
When an item is list A, I want Flow to copy the item to list B. I add additional fields which will be required for the next step.
I use a Get Items action to get the values from list A, then I have an application to each loop with an output value. This is followed by an Update Item action which I point to list B and use the values returned by the Get Items action to update the fields.
This is part of a larger stream (should I create it as its own separate stream?). I check the results of the Update element action and it seems to display the values of the elements in the Id and Body fields but on the output, I get a 404. I don & # 39; haven't recreated all the fields in list A to list B yet because I wanted to run a proof of concept test.
I have a table with a primary key and a secondary key, something like
CREATE TABLE Entry (
PrimaryKey int NOT NULL,
SecondaryKey int NOT NULL,
Data nvarchar(100) NOT NULL,
DateCreated DATETIME NOT NULL
INSERT INTO Entry VALUES(1,1,'test',getutcdate()),
I want to be able to return entries sorted by datecreated, but only 1 entry per secondary key. so with the above data, i would only get 4 lines, the most recent entry for each secondary key.
I created an availability group (two nodes), then my secondary replica is not connected as in the photo. I checked on the error logs and I have this error. how can i give permission to my secondary replica? Thank you.
I have a laptop that I want to boot into Linux with the external monitor as the main one. I know you can do this with a command line function after startup or with a script, but I want Linux to immediately treat HDMI as screen 1 and turn off the laptop screen. This laptop has no screen function keys. I was hoping to use UEFI or something?
I have an AlwaysOn AG configuration between database A (primary replica) on server 1 and database B (secondary replica) on server 2. If I force a manual failover of my primary replica on the server 1 to the secondary replica on server 2, then takes Database A (on server 1) offline, will it be automatically synchronized from database B (on server 2) when I will put it online?
Do I have to wait for synchronization to finish before manually switching to database A from database B?
Can I follow its synchronization progress in the AG dashboard?
My problem: my application consumes all the memory of the server and crashes Tomcat.
I use Eclipse, JSF, MySQL, Hibernate, HikariCP.
Whenever I open a database connection thread, it closes normally, but a second thread is left open forever, which results in memory overhead and Tomcat crashes (Caused by: java .lang.OutOfMemoryError: GC overhead limit exceeded), has anyone experienced this?
The problem is that I realized that Hikari keeps threads running even after consulting the bank, even after the session ends. It's overwhelming my request.
If someone knows how to close them, thank you, or manage to understand the cause of not being finalized, after having closed the main connection with the bank, in any case I appreciate any idea.
Example of open secondary threads (the main Bank connection threads close normally), if I open a screen 10 times, 10 secondary threads will remain in memory, I cannot resolve this memory leak, because I don't ; have no control over these threads.
Demon Thread (HikariPool-1 Maid) (running) Demon thread (cleaning lady HikariPool-2) (running) Demon Thread (HikariPool-3 Maid) (running) Demon thread (cleaning lady HikariPool-4) (running) Demon thread (cleaning lady HikariPool-5) (running) Demon thread (cleaning lady HikariPool-6) (running) Demon thread (cleaning lady HikariPool-7) (running) Demon thread (cleaning lady HikariPool-8) (running) Demon thread (cleaning lady HikariPool-9) (running) Demon Thread (housekeeper HikariPool-10) (Running)
As I do:
The comments on many media sites are horrible. Generally argumentative, factually suspicious, poorly written and, for the most part, damaging the actual content of the page rather than improving it.
In many cases, the comments are not there to improve the content in any way. They are just there to generate clicks. They want people to come back to post their next argument in order to increase the number of page views.
As such, in this situation, it probably makes sense to bury the comments below … and that is probably why most of the sites do this.
On the other hand, if you have great content and attract great commenters who post great reviews, go for it! Highlight them by placing them at the same level as the content of the page.