Why do SJWs get so angry about statements indicating the majority of non black lives lost to police violence matter too?

BLM wants people to believe it’s a uniquely black issue so they can gain a higher victim status and more empathy for their biased cause.   SJWs, well, they can’t help but support identity politics.   

Anything that indicates it’s not just black people who face the problem hurts the black victimization narrative.    

Why was Joe Biden chosen by leftist SJWs to become President? ?

he wasn’t…. he was appointed by the party Old Guard…run by the oldest, wealthiest and yes….the whitest…faction of the DNC… for the specific purpose of PREVENTING those young and progressive voices from threatening their hold on the party…

why do you think Pelosi & Co. are trying so hard to keep everyone mad at Trump?  Last I checked, he wasn’t the one who made the “most diverse and progressive slate of candidates EVER” from the start of the DNC primaries magically vanish and become the old rich white guy….

Why do feminists and other SJWs deny the existence of the Frankfurt School and its theories of cultural Marxism?

"Why do feminists and other SJWs deny the existence of the Frankfurt School and its theories of cultural Marxism?"

Cultural Marxism is the defense of radical social change. TODAY, feminists still want us to believe that feminism, in its current form, is women's simple advocacy for equal rights and NOT Marxist cultural ideology for radical social change .

If the majority of people have really addressed what feminists seek to do with their adherence to cultural Marxism, then most people would not support feminism because most people do not really support Marxist cultural goals.

I will repeat this last piece. Most people do not support Marxist cultural goals.

And that is why all cultural Marxists hide their true identities and prefer to call themselves "progressive" or for "social justice" or for some other nonsense that does not really apply to what they are doing .

It really doesn't help that self-proclaimed unconscious or unconscious "feminists" come here to apologize to Marxist cultural feminists just because they share the name "feminist", but it only Add to the battle for the truth.


Are warriors of social justice annoying? (SJWs) | Promotion Forum

Bullshit. You do not have any quantifiable parameters for injustice, so you do not have victory conditions (for a very simplified example, when blacks occupy X% of all jobs in the world). engineer and represent only Y% of all prisoners, racism ends). That would be good in itself, but you think we have to fight injustice through injustice (homosexuals have always been denied same-sex marriage, leave random CEOs for opinions they had six years ago) . You do not seek converts, you seek to punish and intimidate – white and heterosexual men who do not agree with you must be publicly purged and humiliated. Even the jihadists will save you if you convert; no excuse or future correction will satisfy a SJW.

I could forgive that too if you were not all hypocrites and liars. Your treatment of women and minority dissidents is appalling. if they do not want you to act on their behalf, it's their choice and not an "internalized patriarchy" or whatever. You steal free will. When you are called for these behaviors (as you always insist on calling others), you lie. You swing your opponents (criticize a woman? Misogynist!), You group them at worst (you are a player? You are as bad as the menacing ones of the anonymous rape!) And when you are confronted with your own faults, you reformulate them less in a threatening way (motte and bailey argument). You make all the arguments like kafkatraps (the disagreement with your claim that we are evil is considered proof that we are evil). You publish manipulated and misleading statistics and congratulate everyone who questions them.

You insist that justice be exercised by vigilantes against acts of the week committed at random for your two minutes of hatred. Why is the NFL's case punishing domestic violence? And, if it concerns them, why does not Hope Solo receive the same attention from you?

Then you claim to advocate for equality, but you have taken up the idea of ​​racism (the hate based on the color of the skin is bad) and replaced it with a new concept that a single race may be guilty of racism. You excuse racial prejudice and hatred on the basis of what I have already explained, it is a state of being arbitrary and not measured. Your solution to the unequal treatment of whites and blacks is to keep whites at a higher level. Your party has been pressuring the FBI to redefine rape so that more women are counted, but also for "forced to penetrate" does not count, leaving male victims in the cold. Because the male privilege, apparently.

Historically ignorant SJWs think whites have collective guilt for the terrible acts of our ancestors. But they do not care about the unspeakable atrocities of other races. The only difference between Whites and others was that whites had the social and technological prowess to do evil effectively; Africans, Asians, Indians and all others practiced genocide and slavery, they were just less able to do it properly. Given the means, they would have done the same. But no, only whites are guilty. The Arab oppression of Blacks and Caucasians never happened, not for us, Nope.

I've had the chance to grow up in America, so this shit is new to me. But I come from Puritans and I know my story; I know how they dealt with dissent. I also know how to treat dissent; I grew up next to a grizzled old russian who was barely avoiding the gulag by going out of the country illegally. I know how little you have become tyrants every time you've got enough power.

Even worse, you are returning the very principles of freedom against us. We tolerate you because we believe in freedom of speech and civil discourse, not intimidation and violence. But that means we must watch you defend yourself against this very freedom. We do not believe that it is necessary to ruin the professional life of a stranger to the detriment of an opinion, but it means that we can not punish your actions.

We believe that the rightness of our actions should speak for itself. You believe in intimidation, even as you claim to love the oppressed.

It's funny how devilish and almighty patriarchy has seen fit to act in accordance with SJW's whims for all recent memories, punishing those whom they hate and protecting those whom they love. . It's funny how oppressive men must speak anonymously, while SJWs who struggle against power can use their real names and get traditional media coverage to have fun and make money. How when a million white heterosexual men are bullied, no one cares, but the minute a fag gets hurt, intimidation suddenly becomes important – and the solution , of course, is more intimidation, but by the "good" people.

It's the arrogant core. You do the same harm, in the same way as many others before you, because popular justice, the punishment of dissent and the repression of others are acceptable as long as "good" people do it to "bad" people .

Eat shit and die. All I asked was to stay alone.

Click to enlarge …