Windows 10 system proxy continues to be enabled automatically

My Windows 10 system proxy continues to be enabled for a specific proxy setting of 127.0.0.1:41091. The proxy was previously defined by a VPN application. But even after uninstalling the VPN app. The system proxy is always activated automatically every few minutes. I tried to scan with bitdefender and malwarebytes, I couldn't find anything. What could be the probable cause and how can I stop this.

I even tried to delete everything related to this port from the registry.

Error handling in an event driven system

The context

I have two components A and B, which communicate through events.

B components are responsible for long-running background processes and listen to the following event:

startProcess (uniqueID)

Component A sends startProcess events.

The problem

I need the IDs sent by component A to be unique, because elsewhere component B breaks.

Possible solutions

When Component B receives an ID that has already been assigned to another background job, does not accept it and therefore rejects the launch of a new background process .

The problem here is that component A does not experience rejection, unlike an Http request response design, where the error is communicated via the response.

Question

Is there a better way to handle this, apart from component B which silently refuses to start a new process? A final solution would be to forget about the events and make this request / response. But in general, how do event systems handle this type of scenario?

Latest

What I'm doing right now is that component A is responsible for sending unique identifiers. Is this the solution I'm looking for?

How to facilitate the export of secret channels from an offline system?

I want to use Shamir's secret sharing algorithm to securely store a randomly generated passphrase by splitting up secret shares on paper for example.

The passphrase is generated on an offline system. I am looking for a way to facilitate the process of "exporting" these secrets which can be quite long (~ 100 hexadecimal characters).

I first converted the secrets of hexadecimal to base64. It is not bad but not enough.

Then I tried to compress the strings using different methods, but since this is random data, it doesn't compress well (or not at all).

Then I thought about printing them in QR code, it works fine, but the problem arises later when I have to re-import the secrets, because I would need a camera.

Is there anything else I could try?

How to prevent the SharePoint system from modifying the local URLs of Excel?

To prevent Excel from updating local / relative links to SharePoint when saving local OneDrive files synced to SharePoint:

Excel Options> Trust Center> Trust Center Settings> External Content> "Ask user for automatic update of workbook links" or "Disable automatic link update from the workbook "

It worked for me, links to files in the same folder continue to point to my C: drive, even if the folder is synced with OneDrive on a SharePoint site. I also tested that when files A and B are open, with A linked to B, if I save B under another name, say B2, the link is correctly updated in A.

If, in one way or another, you have updated a link because the option "Enable automatic updating for all links in the workbook (not recommended)" is selected , and if Excel is too long to update the link with the Data> Edit Links tool, you can still manually update it like this while the file is not open:

  1. unzip your Excel file, you should get a folder with the same name
  2. find the relation file for the link: xlexternalLinks_relsexternalLink1.xml.rels
  3. change the relative link to a URL encoded path after the Target setting without changing anything else (with notepad.exe for example):

(only the space character seemed coded in my case)

  1. recompress the contents of the folder (and NOT the folder itself, this is very important!)
  2. rename the zip file to something different from your original file name (usually add something at the end ") and change it Extension .zip to the same extension as your original file (.xlsx or * .xlsm in general)

Crypto system – Crypto-system.biz

Start on 2019-12-14. PerfectMoney, 0 Trust Points (UK) IPB image), Payeer, Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin

Languages: EN

IPB image

The description:

QUOTE

CRYPTO SYSTEM is a trading company which combines the art of trading and the desire for constant development. We are a professional team of traders, lawyers, business analysts and IT specialists. CRYPTO SYSTEM operates on an international level, distributing investments attracted in promising and very profitable commercial directions. The main activity of our company is trading in cryptocurrency.

Investment plans:

104-150% after 1 day
Package 1 $ 10.00 – $ 500.00 104.00
Package $ 2,501.00 – $ 2,000.00 106.00
Plan 3 $ 2001.00 – $ 5000.00 108.00
Package $ 4,500.00 – $ 10,000.00 113.00
Package 5 $ 10,001.00 – $ 20,000.00 120.00
Package 6 $ 20,001.00 – $ 50,000.00 140.00
Plan 7 $ 50,001.00 – $ 100,000.00 150.00

or 130-320% after 5 days
Package 1 $ 10.00 – $ 500.00 130.00%
Package $ 2,501.00 – $ 2,000.00 140.00%
Plan 3 $ 2001.00 – $ 5000.00 160.00%
Package $ 4,500.00 – $ 10,000.00 180.00%
Package 5 $ 10,001.00 – $ 20,000.00 280.00%
Plan 6 $ 20,001.00 – $ 50,000.00 310.00%
Plan 7 $ 50,001.00 – $ 100,000.00 320.00%

or 170-500% after 10 days
Package 1 $ 10.00 – $ 500.00 170.00%
Package $ 2,501.00 – $ 2,000.00 180.00%
Plan 3 $ 2001.00 – $ 5000.00 200.00%
Package $ 4,500.00 – $ 10,000.00 235.00%
Package 5 $ 10,001.00 – $ 20,000.00 305.00%
Package 6 $ 20,001.00 – $ 50,000.00 470.00%
Plan 7 $ 50,001.00 – $ 100,000.00 500.00%

or 260-950% after 15 days
Package 1 $ 10.00 – $ 500.00 260.00%
Package $ 2,501.00 – $ 2,000.00 280.00%
Plan 3 $ 2001.00 – $ 5000.00 340.00%
Package $ 4,500.00 – $ 10,000.00 480.00%
Plan 5 $ 10,001.00 – $ 20,000.00 550.00%
Plan 6 $ 20,001.00 – $ 50,000.00 780.00%
Plan 7 $ 50,001.00 – $ 100,000.00 950.00%

or 410-1300% after 20 days
Package 1 $ 10.00 – $ 500.00 410.00%
Package $ 2,501.00 – $ 2,000.00 430.00%
Plan 3 $ 2001.00 – $ 5000.00 560.00%
Package $ 4,500.00 – $ 10,000.00 610.00%
Package 5 $ 10,001.00 – $ 20,000.00 900.00%
Package 6 $ 20,001.00 – $ 50,000.00 1,150.00%
Package 7 $ 50,001.00 – $ 100,000.00 1,300.00%

or 1500-2400% after 60 days
Package 1 $ 10.00 – $ 5000.00 1500.00%
Package $ 2,500.00 – $ 100,000.00 2,400.00%

or 1000% after 5 days

or 2000% after 10 days

or 3000% after 20 days

Our deposit:

14.12.19 09:34 Transfer sent Payment: 150.00 USD to the account U21000069 of U1294xxx. Lot: 293819404. Memo: Basket payment. Create an all-hyips.info repository.

Details:

Minimum deposit: $ 10
Maximum deposit: $ 100,000
Reference commission: 5%
Payments: instant
Features: SSL, DDOS

Who is:

Name of Registrar Cheap, Inc.

Dates 13 days
Created on 2019-12-01
Expires 2020-12-01
Updated on 2019-12-06

Name servers
NS1.DDOS-GUARD.NET (has 2,631 domains)
NS2.DDOS-GUARD.NET (has 2,631 domains)
NS3.DDOS-GUARD.NET (has 2,631 domains)
NS4.DDOS-GUARD.NET (has 2,631 domains)
NS5.DDOS-GUARD.NET (has 2,631 domains)

S & # 39; REGISTER

node.js – Node JS on Windows: becomes slow when the operating system update is being processed

I currently have a 4-core Windows server. On this server, I installed a nodejs server (rest of API).

It works perfectly without latency.
However, when I start a Windows update for the server, nodejs becomes very slow. Even for an HTTP request returning a JSON {test}, it takes about 30 seconds to respond.

As if the Windows update process was taking up all the processor load. (Nodejs is not multi-threaded)
I don't know if I should do something on the Windows server or in the Node JS code.

The Windows update takes about 40% and nodejs 1% of the CPU. Once the update is complete, everything returns to normal.
What to do ? Thank you for your help.

Thomas

adb – How do I view the Android OS system log file?

After leaving my Samsung Galaxy A-30 (with Android 9) phone for an unbelievable few hours, I realized that all of my internal storage was cleaned up! I don't remember installing a suspicious app, but I just connected a USB flash to my phone for data transfer last day.

Now, I just want to know what happened to my phone's internal storage data. Is there a system log file for Android 9? How do I know if an app with storage authorization has done it?

When will we replace capitalism with a fairer and more just system?

Government by God is the only real solution to the problems of humanity. Jesus is the designated king who will deliver those who seek him.

(Psalms 72: 12-14) "For he will save the poor who ask for help, also the humble and those who have no help." He will have mercy on the poor and the poor, and he will save the lives of the poor. From oppression and violence, he will save them, and their blood will be precious to him. His concern for such people when he was on earth – healing him, feeding multitudes, even laying down his life for them – shows that he will truly be the kind of leader predicted in Bible prophecy.

I invite you to learn more about this and many other biblical topics on JW.org

ūüĆĺ

agnostic system – Improvement of the rules of detection and credibility of lies

Many systems have two or more skills / traits / other numeric values ‚Äč‚Äčthat can be opposed in situations where the A side is trying to assess the credibility of the B side, where the B side may or may not lie. Among many systems, these skills / traits / values ‚Äč‚Äčcan have names such as Empathy / Kinetics / Body language / Detecting lies / etc. and Subterfuge / Acting / Deception / etc. respectively.

Most of the RP / associative / character-based immersion systems I've seen use these two values ‚Äč‚Äčin a kind of opposite roll. Usually, if A wins, the referee tells A's player if B seems to be lying or not. If B wins, no such information is given. (For simplicity's sake, don't consider critical links and wins / losses / successes / failures.)

It works well even with open rollers during some kind of hostile negotiation, where B is already assumed be interested in hiding certain information, and it's no longer a matter of or B tries to mislead A.

However, the above frame breaks down if B tells the truth and wants to convince A, because in this case, suddenly, B is interested in having a low trait (or to renounce entirely the jet, if this is authorized), thus allowing A to detect the lies to inform A of the truth involved. Not only does this produce perverse incentives, but if one gives up a role is permitted, it also results in meta-advice: a target that does not resist the lie detection is immediately more reliable, while the one who does so is immediately suspicious at player even if the character don't know the difference. These factors mean that the mechanic is hostile to attempts to build / play a honest good liar.

I'm looking for an alternative approach to use such skills which can be used when creating a system from scratch, or to organize the procedure for creating such skills (or traits similar) in the systems that use them. These are the improvements I am looking for and the pitfalls that I am trying to avoid:

  • Minimize perverse (essential) incentives, even if you can not really follow them after the character is created.
  • Minimize the possibilities and temptations of meta-games to determine if a character is lying (essential).
  • Avoid increasing the requirements for the amount of secret rollers (if possible). In general, making the role of B secret is more acceptable than the role of A, but keep in mind that in the default interpretation above, the secret of B does not in itself resolve both previous problems.
  • Avoid excessive complexity (if possible), like having too many rollers for the purpose of obscuring.

Is there a design model to solve the lie detection problems in a way that addresses the above concerns?

dnd 5e – Are there faulty applications of this homebrew system "Overcast"?

I plan to add the following homebrew rule variant in a future campaign:

Covered

In case of urgent need, any caster is able to spend their own life force to improve their connection with armor. This allows them to cast a prepared spell without consuming a spell slot.

In this case, you must make a DC 10 + spell level constitution saving throw. If this fails, you take a number of exhaustion levels equal to the level of the spell immediately after it is cast. If successful, you take a number of exhaustion levels equal to half the level of the spell, rounded up, immediately after the spell is cast. If the saving throw fails by 5 or more, you immediately take the exhaustion levels and the spell does not cast.

You can only overcast spells at a spell level less than or equal to your highest level spell location plus one, the total of which does not exceed nine.

As items of this nature tend to have unintended consequences, I hope to eliminate as many exploits as possible before officially introducing it. What are some of the ways to grossly abuse this mechanic?