## mobile – Called back a robo call because I thought it was in response to something I have been waiting for information on and I did press a number 1 or 2

What can happen if you called a spam number back (844-989-1702), and pressed 1 or 2 in answer to question of age? The robo said it would call back. So then I called back the first number, 720-704-7755, and it asked me to press 1 for or just hold for something. Then it went kind of dead and I just hung up. I should have known better. I went to White Pages reverse directory and there were many complaints of these robo calls never ending. But I wonder what kind of access I may have inadvertently given to my phone by pressing a number.

## [ Politics ] Open Question : Stellar Jobs report for may and the DOW Jumps 650 points. I thought Biden said we are heading for another Great Depression?

[ Politics ] Open Question : Stellar Jobs report for may and the DOW Jumps 650 points. I thought Biden said we are heading for another Great Depression?

## Is Donald Trump still hiding in the White House? I thought he was a tough guy?

He’s a HUGE P. U. S. S. Y. FART.   He’s always been a huge p u s s y.  That’s why they call him BONE SPUR BOY because he was too much of a little punk B. I. T. C H to go to war so he cheated to get out of it.   He’s very scared.  The MORBIDLY OBESE CLOWN is butt hurt and whiny and holed up in the basement of the White House with a happy meal and nuggets.

## notation – Are measures better thought of as densities than differentials?

The standard notation for integrating with respect to a measure $$mu$$ is:

$$int f(x),dmu(x).$$

But I’ve wondered if it could be better written as:

$$int f(x)mu(x),dx$$

where $$mu(x)$$ is now thought of as a density. Then applying the measure $$mu$$ to a set $$A$$ can be expressed as $$int mathbf 1_A(x) mu(x),dx$$ or $$langle mathbf 1_A, murangle$$.

In particular, if $$mu$$ is the Dirac $$delta$$ measure, then integrating with respect to $$delta$$ can be written $$int f(x)delta(x),dx$$ instead of the more awkward $$int f(x),ddelta(x)$$. If $$mu$$ is the Lebesgue measure, then we can denote it as $$1$$, and write $$int f(x)cdot 1,dx$$ for the integral of $$f$$ with respect to $$1$$. If $$mu$$ is a probability measure $$p$$, then we can write $$int f(x)p(x),dx$$ for $$mathbb E_p(f(X))$$.

Regarding Stieltjes measures, the appropriate notation for the Stieltjes measure of a monotonic right-continuous function $$g$$ is $$g’$$, not $$dg$$.

I got this idea from reading the nLab entry on the Radon-Nikodym Theorem. There, it’s pointed out that the Radon-Nikodym “derivative” of $$nu$$ with respect to $$mu$$ can be written as $$fracnumu$$. Notice that when written this way, it doesn’t actually look like a derivative. So perhaps, the terminology “Radon-Nikodym derivative” is misleading. Besides, if it were really useful to see it as a derivative, then surely it would satisfy the product rule, but it doesn’t.

Are there any disadvantages of this notation?

## TRÉSON D & # 39; OBAMA: EVEN WORSE THAN WHAT WE THOUGHT – Not only OBAMAGED but with IRAN?

But there is one thing Barack Obama has over all of his competitors: betrayal.

He dumped hundreds of billions of dollars on the Islamic Republic of Iran. There are those who say, "It was their money. It belonged to the Iranian government but had been frozen and unpaid since 1979. "Indeed, and there was a reason for that: even Jimmy Carter, who made the Islamic Republic of Iran possible, did not think that The money, which had been paid by the Shah's government as part of a canceled arms deal, belonged to the mullahs who had overthrown the Shah. . Likewise, Reagan, George H. W. Bush, Clinton and George W. Bush all believed that the Islamic Republic was not beholden to the money owed to the Shah.

Only Barack Obama did it.

The definition of betrayal gives help and comfort to the enemy. The leaders of the Islamic Republic of Iran order their people to sing "Death to America" ​​in mosques every Friday and repeatedly vow to destroy the United States of America and the State of Israel. How to give them billions and help them bypass the sanctions applied by the American government is not treason?

## navigation – Implementation of the miller thought column

I have seen a few questions regarding the deep hierarchy and Miller columns, but I have not seen an example with smaller screens (tablets, this would be the limit. This is not the case). ; is not for phones). I'm not really a user interface designer, plus a web developer, just read a bunch of google hardware design stuff and I like that. I have a project that has a deeply nested structure where it is necessary to go back and forth at different levels quickly. I just wanted to get feedback on this idea. Try to avoid visual clutter, display the breadcrumb trail, while maintaining as much space as possible for the "details" of the content. I have tried to use the shadows on the map to help show depth, but this might not be necessary.
Thank you!

With 3 columns on a smaller screen, it would look something like this:

One idea is to completely collapse all columns – this could be triggered by user action – (not shown)
The columns could easily be expanded by clicking anywhere on it.

Another is to have the last column always visible

Finally, it is the filtering of a selection column. This can have dozens of items in each.

## I thought the dedicated servers were ours to use as we wanted

I just rented my first dedicated server. And they just told me that if I want to use Mysql, I have to leave. I have never heard of such a th … | Read the rest of https://www.webhostingtalk.com/showthread.php?t=1801289&goto=newpost

## dnd 5th – AU Psionic Assistant subclass: interactions between forms of thought

Psionic wizards get a special ability called the thought form where they become beings of pure psionic energy.

As you wear your psionic focus, you
can use bonus action to magically transform
your body in pure psionic energy. the
the transformation lasts 10 minutes, until you
or until you become incapacitated or die.

While you are in thought form, you are a figure of
bright psychic energy, with your psionic
focus hovering inside. Your form may appear as
whatever you want, but it’s obviously magic, it’s
the same size as you, and diffuses a dim light in a 5-
radius of the foot. Any other equipment you are
carry or carry transformations with you and

## dnd 5e – How does the Shield of Thought function of the great old warlock interact with traps or other occasional psychic damage?

Although it may be easy to see how the Thought Shield feature of the great old warlock interacts with spells that deal psychic damage or special attacks from psionic creatures, I don't know how to deal with "second-hand" damage. ".

The relevant part of the Thought Shield functionality reads as follows (PHB, p. 110):

You also have resistance to psychic damage, and each time a creature deals psychic damage to you, that creature takes the same amount of damage as you.

Here my question lies in the meaning of the expression "trafficking in creatures". In my mind, I think it should be closer to the Undying Warlock & # 39; s Among the Dead (SCAG, p. 139) function, saying something like:

If a creature targets you directly with an attack or harmful spell, or if it includes you in an area effect and deals psychic damage to you, that creature suffers the same amount of damage as you.

Is it fair that the latter is too wordy / rules lawyer there? Or should premeditated harmful effects like traps, symbol, Protection Glyph, will creatures summoned or spells cast through dummies (like Invoke Duplicity by Trickery Cleric) also be reduced by half?

My group is running a multi-character player versus player scenario that I am helping DM, and I am trying to advance before problems with our GOO-Locks arise.