How do you feel about duplicate threads?

How do you feel about members posting the same thread on multiple forums?

Similar threads | NulledTeam UnderGround

Description:

Shows a list of similar threads when a user is creating or viewing a thread.

The Similar threads add-on will do the following:

  • Show a list of similar threads when a user is creating a new thread.
  • Show a list of similar threads when a user is viewing a thread.

(Example of Similar threads…

.(tagsToTranslate)nulled(t)nulled sites(t)nulled forum(t)nulled script(t)nulled scripts(t)nulled script forum(t)best nulled scripts site(t)xenforo nulled(t)xenforo 2 nulled(t)xenforo nulled themes(t)seo xenforo 2(t)xenforo themes(t)seo for xenforo(t)vbulletin nulled(t)vbulletin 5 nulled(t)whmcs nulled(t)hexa whmcs(t)whmcs addons nulled(t)whmcs templates nulled(t)whmcs template nulled(t)whmcs modules nulled(t)whmcs themes nulled(t)cs-cart nulled(t)xfilesharing pro nulled(t)blesta nulled(t)arrowchat nulled(t)multi vendor ecommerce script nulled(t)seo providers(t)adsense alternative

python 3.x – Usar Lock() em pyhon para não compartilhar dados entre Threads

Tenho um aplicativo que abre cerca de 25 Threads, ao acessar um método, eventualmente uma thread “rouba” as informações de outra, oq causa erros críticos no sistema.

Estou tentando travar o acesso ao método por Lock() mas não estou conseguindo.

from threading import Thread, Lock, get_ident

def calc(valor1, valor2):
    
    lockCalc = get_ident()
    lockCalc = Lock()
    lockCalc.acquire()    
    
    diferenca = round((valor2 - valor1), 2)

    lockCalc.release()
    return diferenca

multithreading – stable producer/consumer threads in python

I have implemented a producer/consumer functionality using threads in a given framework and
I’m pretty sure I did not cover all possible scenarios.
I made a small reproducible version. Lines ending with # simulate the functionality of the framework.
In the original code the total number of products and consumers is not known until the end.

My goal is to wait in the producer thread until the consumer thread has finished the current product and vice versa. So the order should be:

  • consumer prepare (first or 2nd step)
  • producer produce product #1 (first or 2nd step)
  • consumer consume product #1
  • producer produce product #2
  • consumer consume product #2

    until there is either no product or consumer left

This is a MRE of my code (with sleeps as placeholders), alter the value of n to simulate more or less consumers:

import threading
import time

products = (1,2,3,4,5,None)               #
prodcnt = 0                               #
n = 5                                     #

def produce():
    #simulating incremental calculation of product
    while True:                           #
        global prodcnt                    #
        product = products(prodcnt)       #
        prodcnt += 1                      #
    
        print("got product "+str(product))
        if product == None:
            global exhausted
            exhausted = True
            getProdEvent.set()
            print("exhausted")
            return
        elif noConsumers:
            print("... but no consumers left")
            return
        else:
            print("waiting for permission to process")
            getConsumeEvent.wait()
            time.sleep(0.01)
        print("finished processing")
        getProdEvent.set()
        getConsumeEvent.clear()
    

exhausted = False
noConsumers = False
step = 0

getProdEvent = threading.Event()
getConsumeEvent = threading.Event()

x = threading.Thread(target=produce)    #
x.start()                               #

while not exhausted and not noConsumers:
    if step > 0:
        print("prepare consumption " +str(step))
        getProdEvent.clear()
        if not exhausted:
            getProdEvent.wait()
    else:
        print("preparation")
        time.sleep(0.02)
    print("consumer action")
    time.sleep(0.05)
    
    getConsumeEvent.set()
    if step >= n:                       # simulate no Consumers left
        print("No consumers left")
        noConsumers = True
        getConsumeEvent.set()
    step +=1 

Is there a more straight forward way to force them to wait for each other? Also I feel like my code could break easily.

Also: the producer uses the value of step so the command step +=1 should run only if the producer is stuck in the line getConsumeEvent.wait()

[OzzModz] Russian language for [OzzModz] Force Users To Read Threads

Admin submitted a new resource:

[OzzModz] Russian language for [OzzModz] Force Users To Read Threads – Full russian translation

Full Russian translation

Read more about this resource…

.

[XTR] Hot Threads | NulledTeam UnderGround

[XTR] Hot Threads

This simple addon shows a moving flame icon on thread list.
Manage your hot threads with the thread reply counts.

198914

You can control your hot threads with the style properties . Just select a moving image with .gif extension according to the number of answers.

Image size should be 16x16px.

198908

.

java – en threads cómo mostrar primer elemento de primer array y a continuación primer elemento del segundo array, asi sucesivamente?

Tengo dos arrays de Strings:
String[] mensajes = {“H1: Hola”, “H1: Como te llamas?”, “H1: Cómo eres?”, “H1:Adios”};
String[] mensajes = {“H2: Hola”, “H2: Me llamo Juan?”, “H2: Soy alto!”, “H2:Adios”};
En Java y con threads cómo puedo ir mostrando el primer elemento del primer array y a continuación el primer elemento del segundo array?
De manera que quede como una conversación que diga Hola Hola Cómo te llamas? Me llamo Juan Cómo eres Soy alto Adios Adios

Selling – 1000 Lifetime CAPTCHA Threads for a ONE-TIME Payment to Solve UNLIMITEDLY! | NewProxyLists

1000 Lifetime Threads ONE-TIME Payment to Solve UNLIMITEDLY!

CAPTCHAs.IO has decided to give its users and every developer an offer that would help them greatly with their CAPTCHA automation projects and applications for a lesser cost.

End-users and developers can now enjoy UNLIMITED solves with 1000 threads for just the cost of a ONE-TIME payment of $499.75 USD fixed price and best of all it’s a LIFETIME access for a one-time payment.

To order please go to


Thanks!

Gmail threads that skipped inbox come back to it

Lets say you only have one filter. If you have a simple rule: any email from Bob is given label X, archived, marked as read; when a email from Bob comes in the instructions are followed.

The problem is that if George also received the email and “replies all” to it, now George’s response isn’t caught by the filter, so the conversation ends up in your inbox. The same thing would happen if George didn’t realize you were sent the email and forwarded it to you. The only way to catch George’s response is to have a filter that will apply to the message from George, or to some other part of the new message.

You can’t have the pretense of a label in a filter that applies to an incoming message.

That is how these rules work. The good thing is that if you click on the conversation, and click the archive button, then the inbox label is removed.

500 Lifetime Threads ONE-TIME Payment to Solve UNLIMITEDLY! | NewProxyLists

CAPTCHAs.IO has decided to give its users and every developer an offer that would help them greatly with their CAPTCHA automation projects and applications for a lesser cost.

End-users and developers can now enjoy UNLIMITED solves with 500 threads for just the cost of a ONE-TIME payment of $249.88 USD fixed price and best of all it’s a LIFETIME access for a one-time payment.

To order please go to https://captchas.io/?p=5L

Thanks!