How to get the full URL from a list of short URLs?

Good morning all. Anyone know of an online site or something I can use to get the full URL from a list of shortened URLs?

I don't want to visit them all one by one, it would take too long.

I'm talking about a list of shortened URLs of around 500 URLs.

So it would take too long to get the full URL for them this way.
SEMrush

I need to know an online site / tool where I can paste the URLs and hit Submit and that just gives me the full URL for them.

Does anyone know something like this?

Thanks guys!

Mike.

Lock and shorten URLS EARN MONEY – URL shortener with CPA – Other opportunities to earn money

Lock.ist is a URL shortening service combined with content locking. The revenue model for this network is the CPA. You will therefore not be paid for clicks and impressions. Users need to take action such as installing software or filling out a simple form.

How do I get started with Lock.ist?

When you shorten the link using Lock.ist, it will lock automatically. The visitor must perform a simple task to unlock the link. For each task, you receive a commission of $ 0.10 to $ 10.

Payment

You are paid in 2 working days when you reach the minimum payment. The payment option is only Bitcoin. The minimum payment is $ 20.

Reference program

Publishers can earn extra money by referring others to this network. The commission rate is 10% for life.

Best features

-This network accepts members from all over the world.

-You do not need a website or blog to use this service.

-Tools (Website Widget, Browser button and API)

-Reference system

-Members always receive payment on time.

– Dedicated support

For tips and ideas: https://lock.ist/pages/tips-ideas

Reference link: https://lock.ist/ref/MomMoney12

Link: https://lock.ist/

How to get rid of unnecessary Google Search Console URLs?

66 pages from my website that are all deleted still appear in the Google Search Console page report. enter description of image hereMy eagerness is to know all the possibilities. Questions include: 1. Does it affect SEO? 2. How can I get rid of these URLs completely?

8 – Is the path_alias table queried for all URLs?

I'm trying to generate SEO-optimized URLs for a set of exposed filters. For example:

/analyst-relations/firm?related_firm=5072 would look like

/analyst-relations/firm/forrester

I imagined doing this by adding / updating / deleting this path programmatically to the path_alias table when creating / modifying / deleting the term or the relevant entity. However, I seem to have misunderstood how path_alias works. I managed to add the path /analyst-relations/firm?related_firm=5072 and alias /analyst-relations/firm/forrester, but the exposed filter links always load like the first ones. Is the path_alias table not queried for all URLs? If not, is it possible to somehow “link” this path and this alias to an entity?

EDIT:
I use better exposed filters to expose the filters as links, so afaik there is no form submission

Jekyll SEO – Google does not display any URLs from this month

it may be a wired question but it is true. I host a blog with Jekyll. I also installed the Jekyll SEO jewel. I have hosted it for the past 2 years, no problems until this month of April. But as of this month, what are all the posts I have posted are not all displayed in Google. From the Google search console, I can see that the URL is indexed and also available on a sitemap.

2 days before posting an article, and I did manual indexing, for the next 24 hours, it was showing up in google. But after that, it was deleted. But when I search in google with these keywords, the home page of my blog arrives, because it is the first article, but I do not know why it does not display the real link.

But my old articles are good, they always appear from the first page, the problem comes from this month of April.

apache – .htaccess redirects to "410 Gone" status for URLs containing a letter + the word "shop" after the domain

After recovering the Drupal 7 site from a malware attack, I end up with a lot of links pointing to (previously) spam content like this:

https://www.example.com/lshop/puma-rihanna-c-449/?zenid=id311p8tc67mbnbu8gb17d1uf1
https://www.example.com/eshop/nike-start-l-259/
https://www.example.com/eshop
https://www.example.com/fshop/adidas-maradona-k-149/

The content has been removed but the backlinks have remained. I was able to compose these rules by .htaccess redirect malicious backlinks to 410 Gone status page:


redirect 410 /ashop/
redirect 410 /ashop

redirect 410 /bshop/
redirect 410 /bshop

redirect 410 /cshop/
redirect 410 /cshop

redirect 410 /eshop/
redirect 410 /eshop

redirect 410 /fshop/
redirect 410 /fshop

redirect 410 /ishop/
redirect 410 /ishop

redirect 410 /lshop/
redirect 410 /lshop

redirect 410 /oshop/
redirect 410 /oshop

redirect 410 /pshop/
redirect 410 /pshop

The list may be longer. How to catch – using regex – pattern "backslash after the domain + a letter + word & # 39; boutique & # 39; optionally continues with backslash"and redirect this link to 410 at the server level before hitting Drupal?

I tried to follow the models based on these two answers but without success:

redirect 410 /(a-z)shop/
redirect 410 /^((a-zA-Z))shop/
redirect 410 ^/((a-z))(shop)/(.*)$
redirect 410 ^(a-z)shop+$

URL settings – Custom URLs for Facebook ads not showing conversions in Google Analytics?

I use the Facebook dynamic URL settings in our paid ads and all statistics are displayed, except for conversion data (transaction / earnings) in Google Analytics. All UTMs have been validated and all parameters (source / support / campaign) are also displayed correctly in Google Analytics. No conversion data. We always use “static” UTM codes without any problem. Anyone know what could be going on here? Is this a Facebook or Google problem most likely? Should I try to use the "static" URL settings in our Facebook ads and see if it works? Finally, we use the Google Analytics standard and improved e-commerce tracking.

inserting URLs in blog comments

Anyone know how to correctly insert URLs (with anchor) in blog comments?
(My?) GSA SER seems to fail a lot, even if all the pages are full of comments with URLs inserted with an anchor. For my projects, it can make THE difference.
I tried with:
%link%
BBCode
Check the option "Always try to insert a link in the comments".
Nothing works and I'm tired of it …
Lots of work in vain, preparation of lists, etc. Right at the start, I had to stop.
And the number of (empty) anchors makes the difference. You don't know why GSA SER is unable to insert these links.

python – Using pymongo to scrape over 4 million URLs using multiprocessing to examine the impact of coronavirus

So I want to do some research on the impact of covid 19 on businesses. I have successfully generated a database with the company name and the URLs of the websites associated with it. Now, I want to scrape them off as quickly as possible so that I can analyze them. I am new to using parallel programming and I am skeptical, I connect to each database as securely as possible.

from __future__ import division

from multiprocessing import Pool

import pymongo as pym
import requests
from bs4 import BeautifulSoup

# Set up local client
client = pym.MongoClient('mongodb://localhost:27017/')
# Connect to local DB
db = client.local_db
# Connect to Collections
My_Collection = db.MyCollection
ScrapedPagesAprilCollection = db.ScrapedPagesApril

# I don't want to scrape these
LIST_OF_DOMAINS_TO_IGNORE = ('google.com/', 'linkedin.com/', 'facebook.com/')


def parse(url):
    if any(domain in url for domain in LIST_OF_DOMAINS_TO_IGNORE):
        pass
    elif '.pdf' in url:
        pass
    else:
        # print(url)
        headers = {
            'User-Agent': 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:74.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/74.0',
        }
        page = requests.get(url, headers=headers)
        print(f'{url}: {page.status_code}')
        if page.status_code == 200:
            soup = BeautifulSoup(page.text, 'lxml')
            text = soup.get_text(separator=" ")
            info_to_store = {
                '_id': url,
                'content': text
            }

            if 'coronavirus' in text:
                info_to_store('Impacted') = True

            # Insert into Collection
            ScrapedPagesAprilCollection.replace_one(
                {'_id': url}, info_to_store, upsert=True)

        elif page.status_code != 200:
            print(f'{url}: {str(page.status_code)}')
            pass


def covid19_scrape_pages(collection, query: dict):
    """
    Wanting to update the pages already matched

    Parameters
    ----------
    collection : pymongo.collection.Collection
    query : dict

    Yields
    -------
    A url

    """
    # Get the cursor
    mongo_cursor = collection.find(query, no_cursor_timeout=True)
    # For company in the cursor, yield the urls
    for company in mongo_cursor:
        for url in company('URLs'):
            doc = ScrapedPagesAprilCollection.find_one({'_id': url})
            # If I haven't already scraped it, then yield the url
            if doc is None:
                yield (url)


def main():
    print('Make sure LIST_OF_DOMAINS_TO_IGNORE is updated by running',
          'blacklisted_domains.py first')
    urls_gen = covid19_scrape_pages(
        My_Collection, {})
    pool = Pool(8)
    pool.map(parse, urls_gen)
    pool.close()
    pool.join()


if __name__ == "__main__":  # Required logic expression
    main()
```

seo – Page with links to other pages whose canonical URLs are set to the URL of the original page

My website has a page A which displays search results, each as a separate link. Clicking on a link will open a new page B_link where the only thing that happens is to redirect the user to another website (the location of the page is changed to Javascript). The problem is that these intermediate pages B_link (which are used for redirection) are indexed by google, which does not help, as they simply redirect the user to another website.

One option would be to not index these pages at all, but that means I would be wasting valuable indexing from the search engines. So I am wondering if it is correct to set the canonical URL for the B_link pages to the URL of the original search results page A.

I think if I do, the search results page A will end up having links to pages with the canonical URL set to its own URL (the URL of A), which seems to me to be a loop. Do the search engines agree with this?