FRESH ! FRESH !! FULLZ AND CREDIT FRESH AND VALID | NewProxyLists

FRESH ! FRESH !! FRESH AND VALID FULLZ AND CREDIT CARDS ARE UPDATED HERE

I GOT A FRESH FULLZ WITH A GOOD BALANCE AND I ALSO PROVIDE ALL FULLZ DETAILS

INFORMATION ON MY FULLZ

First name: Kathryn
Middle name: M
Name: Ratledge
Spouse Name: Ruth Ratledge
Father's Name: Thomas Ratledge
Invoicing address: 9 Ridgewood Dr
City: Greenville
State: CA
Postal code: 29615
Country: US
Phone number: 15629234492
Credit card information:
*********
Card type: credit
Credit card number: 4737033009002349
Exp. Date: 18/02
Name on the map: Kathryn Ratledge
CV2: 736
ATM pin: 5910
Bank Name: Bankk of America
Routing number: 122000661
Account number: 0222301305
Mother's Maiden Name: Coleman
Social security number: 340224188
Birth day: 19
Birth month: June 8
Year of birth: 1980
Account information:
*******
AOL ID: Glendeweese
Password: BeenThere754

I WILL GET YOU A GOOD FULLZ WITH A GOOD BALANCE

COUNTIES NOW

* EURO
* UNITED STATES
* CANADA
* UK
* ASIA
* ITALY
* GERMAN
* AND MUCH MORE

YOU HAVE PUT ME IN AND ASK YOUR COUNTRY

I ALSO HAVE A GOOD CREDIT CARD WITH A GOOD BALANCE HERE

INFORMATION ON MY CREDIT CARDS

CCN
4147182090101116
CCV
197
EXP
0619
Holder information
Last name
Deborah Mariotti
DOB
N / A
Phone
Address
Country
UNITED STATES
State
California
City
Martinez
Zip *: French
94553
address
5319 Stonehurst Drive

CCN
4833140007461733
CCV
568
EXP
0418
Holder information
Last name
David Layton
DOB
N / A
Phone
7205637997
Address
Country
UNITED STATES
State
CO
City
Fraser
Zip *: French
80442
address
PO BOX 362

COUNTIES NOW

* EURO
* UNITED STATES
* CANADA
* UK
* ASIA

YOU CAN ALSO HIT ME WITH YOUR BINS

===== >>>> RULES <<<< ========

* Items are only returned to you after payment.! NO WASTE OF TIME
* Items will be sent to you immediately after receipt of your payment.
* I check my belongings at the request of the client
* I don't give any test, don't waste my time …
* Instant delivery with BTC (BITCOIN) (PAYPAL) or PM (PERFECT MONEY)

YOU CAN CONTACT ME ON ICQ TO MAKE YOUR ORDER

EMAIL (Y! M): (protected by e-mail)

Telegram: marktenson

ICQ: 816185

Discord: Bestever # 1205

LET WORK NOW! LET WORK NOW !! LET WORK NOW !!! …

FRESH ! FRESH !! FULLZ AND CREDIT FRESH AND VALID | NewProxyLists

FRESH ! FRESH !! FRESH AND VALID FULLZ AND CREDIT CARDS ARE UPDATED HERE

I GOT A FRESH FULLZ WITH A GOOD BALANCE AND I ALSO PROVIDE ALL FULLZ DETAILS

INFORMATION ON MY FULLZ

First name: Kathryn
Middle name: M
Name: Ratledge
Spouse Name: Ruth Ratledge
Father's Name: Thomas Ratledge
Invoicing address: 9 Ridgewood Dr
City: Greenville
State: CA
Postal code: 29615
Country: US
Phone number: 15629234492
Credit card information:
*********
Card type: credit
Credit card number: 4737033009002349
Exp. Date: 18/02
Name on the map: Kathryn Ratledge
CV2: 736
ATM pin: 5910
Bank Name: Bankk of America
Routing number: 122000661
Account number: 0222301305
Mother's Maiden Name: Coleman
Social security number: 340224188
Birth day: 19
Birth month: June 8
Year of birth: 1980
Account information:
*******
AOL ID: Glendeweese
Password: BeenThere754

I WILL GET YOU A GOOD FULLZ WITH A GOOD BALANCE

COUNTIES NOW

* EURO
* UNITED STATES
* CANADA
* UK
* ASIA
* ITALY
* GERMAN
* AND MUCH MORE

YOU HAVE PUT ME IN AND ASK YOUR COUNTRY

I ALSO HAVE A GOOD CREDIT CARD WITH A GOOD BALANCE HERE

INFORMATION ON MY CREDIT CARDS

CCN
4147182090101116
CCV
197
EXP
0619
Holder information
Last name
Deborah Mariotti
DOB
N / A
Phone
Address
Country
UNITED STATES
State
California
City
Martinez
Zip *: French
94553
address
5319 Stonehurst Drive

CCN
4833140007461733
CCV
568
EXP
0418
Holder information
Last name
David Layton
DOB
N / A
Phone
7205637997
Address
Country
UNITED STATES
State
CO
City
Fraser
Zip *: French
80442
address
PO BOX 362

COUNTIES NOW

* EURO
* UNITED STATES
* CANADA
* UK
* ASIA

YOU CAN ALSO HIT ME WITH YOUR BINS

===== >>>> RULES <<<< ========

* Items are only returned to you after payment.! NO WASTE OF TIME
* Items will be sent to you immediately after receipt of your payment.
* I check my belongings at the request of the client
* I don't give any test, don't waste my time …
* Instant delivery with BTC (BITCOIN) (PAYPAL) or PM (PERFECT MONEY)

YOU CAN CONTACT ME ON ICQ TO MAKE YOUR ORDER

EMAIL (Y! M): (protected by e-mail)

Telegram: marktenson

ICQ: 816185

Discord: Bestever # 1205

LET WORK NOW! LET WORK NOW !! LET WORK NOW !!! …

FRESH ! FRESH !! FULLZ AND CREDIT FRESH AND VALID | NewProxyLists

FRESH ! FRESH !! FRESH AND VALID FULLZ AND CREDIT CARDS ARE UPDATED HERE

I GOT A FRESH FULLZ WITH A GOOD BALANCE AND I ALSO PROVIDE ALL FULLZ DETAILS

INFORMATION ON MY FULLZ

First name: Kathryn
Middle name: M
Name: Ratledge
Spouse Name: Ruth Ratledge
Father's Name: Thomas Ratledge
Invoicing address: 9 Ridgewood Dr
City: Greenville
State: CA
Postal code: 29615
Country: US
Phone number: 15629234492
Credit card information:
*********
Card type: credit
Credit card number: 4737033009002349
Exp. Date: 18/02
Name on the map: Kathryn Ratledge
CV2: 736
ATM pin: 5910
Bank Name: Bankk of America
Routing number: 122000661
Account number: 0222301305
Mother's Maiden Name: Coleman
Social security number: 340224188
Birth day: 19
Birth month: June 8
Year of birth: 1980
Account information:
*******
AOL ID: Glendeweese
Password: BeenThere754

I WILL GET YOU A GOOD FULLZ WITH A GOOD BALANCE

COUNTIES NOW

* EURO
* UNITED STATES
* CANADA
* UK
* ASIA
* ITALY
* GERMAN
* AND MUCH MORE

YOU HAVE PUT ME IN AND ASK YOUR COUNTRY

I ALSO HAVE A GOOD CREDIT CARD WITH A GOOD BALANCE HERE

INFORMATION ON MY CREDIT CARDS

CCN
4147182090101116
CCV
197
EXP
0619
Holder information
Last name
Deborah Mariotti
DOB
N / A
Phone
Address
Country
UNITED STATES
State
California
City
Martinez
Zip *: French
94553
address
5319 Stonehurst Drive

CCN
4833140007461733
CCV
568
EXP
0418
Holder information
Last name
David Layton
DOB
N / A
Phone
7205637997
Address
Country
UNITED STATES
State
CO
City
Fraser
Zip *: French
80442
address
PO BOX 362

COUNTIES NOW

* EURO
* UNITED STATES
* CANADA
* UK
* ASIA

YOU CAN ALSO HIT ME WITH YOUR BINS

===== >>>> RULES <<<< ========

* Items are only returned to you after payment.! NO WASTE OF TIME
* Items will be sent to you immediately after receipt of your payment.
* I check my belongings at the request of the client
* I don't give any test, don't waste my time …
* Instant delivery with BTC (BITCOIN) (PAYPAL) or PM (PERFECT MONEY)

YOU CAN CONTACT ME ON ICQ TO MAKE YOUR ORDER

EMAIL (Y! M): (protected by e-mail)

Telegram: marktenson

ICQ: 816185

Discord: Bestever # 1205

LET WORK NOW! LET WORK NOW !! LET WORK NOW !!! …

Problem when using connector Send HTTP request to SharePoint connector in Flow / PowerAutomate = Slug header not valid for BLOBs

I get the dreaded error message "Invalid slug header for BLOBs"

"message": "Slug header not valid for BLOBs. Slug headers must be the server or web relative URL of the file. Server relative URLs start with a forward slash ( "/ "). r nclientRequestId: fea67666- 7382-44a7-a185-3c20d91b57b2 r nserviceRequestId: cca7409f-7080-2000-42e3-84a196d20638 ",

"status": 400,

"source": "https: //XXXXXX.sharepoint.com/sites/DatblyguAcAdeiladuOrNewydd-DevelopmentandNewBuild/_vti_bin/listd …",

"mistakes": ()

I called listdata.svc using the doclib name entered by Flow and it works as expected in a browser

I checked the unique ID of the document set (I even tried to create a standard folder using the correct ID = same result)

Here is the connector as a configuration = I am trying to create a set of documents called & # 39; Test & # 39; (using the ID of the verified document set listed) in the Project Documents document in the Teams site collection DatblyguAcAdeiladuOrNewydd-DevelopmentandNewBuild Teams

enter description of image here

What am i doing wrong?

Thanks in advance!

Error with purchased plugin: "The update failed. Error message: the response is not a valid JSON response."

I'm new to Yootheme and bought the base package, which I tested on website 1. When I follow the same steps to install on website 2, I see

The package could not be installed. No valid plugin was found.

I disabled and deleted the theme from website 1, tried again to install it in website 2 and got the same error.

I reinstalled WordPress from scratch (bitnami and AWS), and I still get the same error. When I reinstall the plugin on website 1, I also get the same error.

This page suggests that this is a problem with SSL, so I have checked that and everything seems to be in order.

How can I fix it?

checkout – Personalized Magento 2 form in the delivery address before the form does not valid for registered customers

I added a custom form in the delivery address before the form. This form valid for a guest payment process but does not work for connected customers who have already added address information.

Below is my Layoutprocessor file where I inject the custom field at the shipping step before the form.

$customAttributeCode = 'experience_survey_option';
       $customField = (
        'component' => 'Magento_Ui/js/form/element/select',
        'config' => (
            'customScope' => 'shippingAddress.custom_attributes',
            'template' => 'ui/form/field',
            'elementTmpl' => 'ui/form/element/select',
            'id' => 'drop-down',
        ),
        'dataScope' => 'shippingAddress.custom_attributes.experience_survey_option',
        'label' => $this->getSelectLabel(),
        'provider' => 'checkoutProvider',
        'visible' => true,
        'validation' => ('required-entry' => true),
        'sortOrder' => 150,
        'id' => 'drop-down',
        'options' => $this->getSelectOptions()
    );
    $jsLayout('components')('checkout')('children')('steps')('children')('shipping-step')('children')('shippingAddress')('children')('before-form')('children')('experience-survey-form')('children')('experience-survey-checkout-form-fieldset')('children')($customAttributeCode) = $customField;

I also attach the screenshots of the payment form.

  1. Guest payment

guest crate

2. connected to the customer's cash register

connected client checkout

Any help would be appreciated. Thank you.

Does HSTS prevent MITM from using a valid certificate?

HSTS does not contain any type of fingerprint (it would rather be HPKP). It only states that the site must be loaded with HTTPS and that the certificate must be trusted directly, i.e. no circumvention of warnings by the user should be allowed. Since HSTS does not prevent MITM if the attacker can use a valid certificate issued by a certification authority approved by the client.

It is not known exactly what exactly you saw with the Burp suite, but perhaps you were used to bypassing certificate warnings when using Burp instead of importing Burp's CA as approved, and bypassing certificate warnings no longer works with HSTS.

mysql – Error in StoredProcedure: is not valid at this position, waiting for an identifier

You can use it as a stored procedure.

As you can see, Mysql doesn't like something about your procedure, it starts with session variables which I replaced with regular variables _p is only to show that it is ; is an alokal variable.
MYSQL SELECT INTO is a way to get a result of a SELECT in a variable

the

IF THEN 
  some statement
ELSE 
  some statement
END IF  

The construction must always be implemented in this form (the rest is optional) and must have a value between IF … END IF or between IF … ELSE … END IF have an instruction.

DELIMITER $$
CREATE PROCEDURE `sp_login` (IN _u varchar(50),IN  _p varchar(100))
BEGIN
    DECLARE _ap varchar(50);
    SELECT passwd INTO _ap FROM transportesclaudia.usuarios WHERE login=_u;

    IF _ap IS NULL THEN 
        RETURN -1;
    ELSE
        IF _ap = _p THEN
            RETURN  1;
        ELSE
            RETURN  -2;
        END IF;
    END IF;
END;
DELIMITER ;

hashing – Multiplying hashes is a valid way to ensure that two sets of data are identical (but in an arbitrary order)

Let's say that "user A" has a dataset as below. Each entry has been hashed (sha256) to guarantee integrity within a single entry. You cannot modify the data of a single entry without also modifying the corresponding hash:

(
{ data: "000000", hash: "91b4d142823f7d20c5f08df69122de43f35f057a988d9619f6d3138485c9a203" }, 
{ data: "111111", hash: "bcb15f821479b4d5772bd0ca866c00ad5f926e3580720659cc80d39c9d09802a" }, 
{ data: "345345", hash: "dbd3b3fcc3286d927ec214c5648fbb226353a239789750f51430b1e6e9d91f4f" }, 
)

And "user B" has the same data but in a slightly different order. The hashes are the same of course:

(
{ data: "345345", hash: "dbd3b3fcc3286d927ec214c5648fbb226353a239789750f51430b1e6e9d91f4f" }, 
{ data: "111111", hash: "bcb15f821479b4d5772bd0ca866c00ad5f926e3580720659cc80d39c9d09802a" }, 
{ data: "000000", hash: "91b4d142823f7d20c5f08df69122de43f35f057a988d9619f6d3138485c9a203" }, 
)

I want allow two users to verify that they have exactly the same data set, ignoring the sort order. If, as an extreme example, a hacker is able to replace user B's files with otherwise valid data, users should be able to compare a hash of all of their games and detect an incompatibility.

I was thinking of calculating a "total hash" that users could compare to verify. It should be almost impossible to fabricate a valid looking dataset that results in the same "total hash". But as the order can change, it's a bit tricky.

I may have a possible solution, but I'm not sure if it's secure enough. Is it really safe?

My idea is to convert each sha256 hash to an integer (BigInt javascript) and multiply them with modulo to obtain a total hash of similar length:

 var entries = (
{ data: "345345", hash: "dbd3b3fcc3286d927ec214c5648fbb226353a239789750f51430b1e6e9d91f4f" }, 
{ data: "111111", hash: "bcb15f821479b4d5772bd0ca866c00ad5f926e3580720659cc80d39c9d09802a" }, 
{ data: "000000", hash: "91b4d142823f7d20c5f08df69122de43f35f057a988d9619f6d3138485c9a203" }, 
);

var hashsize = BigInt("0xffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff");
var totalhash = BigInt(1); // arbitrary starting point

for (var i = 0; i < entries.length; i++) {
  var entryhash = BigInt("0x" + entries(i).hash);
  totalhash = (totalhash * entryhash) % hashsize; 
}
totalhash = totalhash.toString(16); // convert from bigint back to hex string

This should result in the same hash for user A and user B, unless others have corrupted data, right? How difficult would it be to create a slightly different but valid looking dataset that would result in the same total checksum? Or is there a better way to accomplish this (without sorting!).

object oriented – Could this be considered a valid implementation of GoF state model?

For educational purposes, I would like to create a simple implementation of State model using PHP 7.4.
So I tried to create a simple "document status machine" from Draft, sending it for review and, after three "votes", it can be published:

document = $document;
    }
    public function review() {
        throw new Exception("Document cannot be reviewed in this current state (". get_class($this).")");
    }
    public function approve() {
        throw new Exception("Document cannot be approved in this current state (". get_class($this).")");
    }

    public function publish() {
        throw new Exception("Document cannot be published in this current state (". get_class($this).")");
    }

    public function reject() {
        throw new Exception("Document cannot be rejected in this current state (". get_class($this).")");
    }
}

class Document implements DocumentManagement {

    private string $content;
    private State  $currentState;
    private int $approvals = 0;

    public function __construct(string $content) {
        $this->content = $content;
        $this->currentState = new Draft($this);
    }
    public function getContent(): string {
        return $this->content;
    }
    public function setContent(string $content){
        $this->content = $content;
        $this->currentState = new Draft($this);
        $this->approvals = 0;
    }
    public function setState(State $state){
        $this->currentState = $state;
    }
    public function addApproval(){
        $this->approvals++;
    }
    public function disapprove(){
        $this->approvals--;
    }
    public function getApprovals(){
        return $this->approvals;
    }
    public function review() {
        $this->currentState->review();
    }
    public function approve() {
        $this->currentState->approve();
    }
    public function publish() {
        $this->currentState->publish();
    }
    public function reject() {
        $this->currentState->reject();
    }

}

class Draft extends State {

    public function review() {
        $this->document->setState(new InReview($this->document));
    }
}

class InReview extends State {

    public function approve() {
        $this->document->addApproval();
    }
    public function publish() {
        if($this->document->getApprovals() > 2){ //needs 3 votes at least
            $this->document->setState(new Published($this->document));
        }else{
            parent::publish();
        }
    }
    public function reject() {
        $this->document->disapprove();
    }

}

class Published extends State {
    public function __construct(Document $document) {
        parent::__construct($document);
        print('document published !');
    }
}

$document = new Document("hello world !");
$document->review();
$document->approve();
$document->approve();
$document->approve();
$document->publish();
  • So, could this be considered a valid implementation of the GoF state model
    ?
  • Is this also a valid S.O.L.I.D? My main fear is how much
    new state …
  • Is there any improvement to be made?

Thanks in advance!

document = $document;
    }
    public function review() {
        throw new Exception("Document cannot be reviewed in this current state (". get_class($this).")");
    }
    public function approve() {
        throw new Exception("Document cannot be approved in this current state (". get_class($this).")");
    }

    public function publish() {
        throw new Exception("Document cannot be published in this current state (". get_class($this).")");
    }

    public function reject() {
        throw new Exception("Document cannot be rejected in this current state (". get_class($this).")");
    }
}

class Document implements DocumentManagement {

    private string $content;
    private State  $currentState;
    private int $approvals = 0;

    public function __construct(string $content) {
        $this->content = $content;
        $this->currentState = new Draft($this);
    }
    public function getContent(): string {
        return $this->content;
    }
    public function setContent(string $content){
        $this->content = $content;
        $this->currentState = new Draft($this);
        $this->approvals = 0;
    }
    public function setState(State $state){
        $this->currentState = $state;
    }
    public function addApproval(){
        $this->approvals++;
    }
    public function disapprove(){
        $this->approvals--;
    }
    public function getApprovals(){
        return $this->approvals;
    }
    public function review() {
        $this->currentState->review();
    }
    public function approve() {
        $this->currentState->approve();
    }
    public function publish() {
        $this->currentState->publish();
    }
    public function reject() {
        $this->currentState->reject();
    }

}

class Draft extends State {

    public function review() {
        $this->document->setState(new InReview($this->document));
    }
}

class InReview extends State {

    public function approve() {
        $this->document->addApproval();
    }
    public function publish() {
        if($this->document->getApprovals() > 2){ //needs 3 votes at least
            $this->document->setState(new Published($this->document));
        }else{
            parent::publish();
        }
    }
    public function reject() {
        $this->document->disapprove();
    }

}

class Published extends State {
    public function __construct(Document $document) {
        parent::__construct($document);
        print('document published !');
    }
}

$document = new Document("hello world !");
$document->review();
$document->approve();
$document->approve();
$document->approve();
$document->publish();
  • So, could this be considered a valid implementation of the GoF state model
    ?
  • Is this also a valid S.O.L.I.D? My main fear is how much
    new state …
  • Is there any improvement to be made?

The sandbox version is here.
Thanks in advance!